Literature DB >> 23109679

Instrument-based pediatric vision screening policy statement.

Joseph M Miller, Herschel R Lessin.   

Abstract

A policy statement describing the use of automated vision screening technology (instrument-based vision screening) is presented. Screening for amblyogenic refractive error with instrument-based screening is not dependent on behavioral responses of children, as when visual acuity is measured. Instrument-based screening is quick, requires minimal cooperation of the child, and is especially useful in the preverbal, preliterate, or developmentally delayed child. Children younger than 4 years can benefit from instrument-based screening, and visual acuity testing can be used reliably in older children. Adoption of this new technology is highly dependent on third-party payment policies, which could present a significant barrier to adoption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23109679     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-2548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  28 in total

1.  Validation of the 2WIN Corneal Reflexes App in children.

Authors:  Elisabetta Racano; Giulia Di Stefano; Salvatore Alessi; Riccardo Pertile; Federica Romanelli
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Accuracy of the Spot and Plusoptix photoscreeners for detection of astigmatism.

Authors:  Mabel Crescioni; Joseph M Miller; Erin M Harvey
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.220

3.  Instrument-based screening for amblyopia risk factors in a primary care setting in children aged 18 to 30 months.

Authors:  Mònica Vilà-de Muga; Diego Van Esso; Silvia Alarcon; Charlotte Wolley Dod; Dolors Llop; Anna Callés; Dàlia Ribas; Emma Vilaró; Montserrat Carreras; Romina Gomez; Paula Baez; Rut Murias
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Early Childhood Vision Screening in Hawai'i Utilizing a Hand-Held Screener.

Authors:  Duane A Chang; Roger C Ede; Dominic C Chow; Ryan D Souza; Louie Mar A Gangcuangco; Nancy Hanks; Beau K Nakamoto; Brooks Mitchell; Alison T Masutani; Sam Fisk; Cecilia M Shikuma; Jan E Dill
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2015-09

5.  A new computer-based pediatric vision-screening test.

Authors:  Tomohiko Yamada; Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Pamela S Moke; Nick L Parrucci; J Jeffrey Reese; James B Ruben; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.220

6.  The effectiveness of the Spot Vision Screener in detecting amblyopia risk factors.

Authors:  Mae Millicent W Peterseim; Carrie E Papa; M Edward Wilson; Jennifer D Davidson; Maria Shtessel; Mavesh Husain; Edward W Cheeseman; Bethany J Wolf; Rupal Trivedi
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.220

7.  Validation of the Pediatric Vision Scanner in a normal preschool population.

Authors:  Shaival S Shah; Jennifer J Jimenez; Emily J Rozema; Miki T Nguyen; Melissa Preciado; Ashish M Mehta
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 1.325

8.  Vision screening for children 36 to <72 months: recommended practices.

Authors:  Susan A Cotter; Lynn A Cyert; Joseph M Miller; Graham E Quinn
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  The W.H.E.E.L.S. Preschool Vision Screening Program's Initial Outcomes for 12,402 Children Screened Using the Plusoptix Photoscreener.

Authors:  Natario L Couser
Journal:  Int Sch Res Notices       Date:  2014-07-01

10.  Comparing School-Aged Refraction Measurements Using the 2WIN-S Portable Refractor in Relation to Cycloplegic Retinoscopy: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Ziming Liu; Emmanuel Eric Pazo; Hong Ye; Cui Yu; Ling Xu; Wei He
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.