PURPOSE: Especially in the field of radiation oncology, handling a large variety of voluminous datasets from various information systems in different documentation styles efficiently is crucial for patient care and research. To date, conducting retrospective clinical analyses is rather difficult and time consuming. With the example of patients with pancreatic cancer treated with radio-chemotherapy, we performed a therapy evaluation by using an analysis system connected with a documentation system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total number of 783 patients have been documented into a professional, database-based documentation system. Information about radiation therapy, diagnostic images and dose distributions have been imported into the web-based system. RESULTS: For 36 patients with disease progression after neoadjuvant chemoradiation, we designed and established an analysis workflow. After an automatic registration of the radiation plans with the follow-up images, the recurrence volumes are segmented manually. Based on these volumes the DVH (dose volume histogram) statistic is calculated, followed by the determination of the dose applied to the region of recurrence. All results are saved in the database and included in statistical calculations. CONCLUSION: The main goal of using an automatic analysis tool is to reduce time and effort conducting clinical analyses, especially with large patient groups. We showed a first approach and use of some existing tools, however manual interaction is still necessary. Further steps need to be taken to enhance automation. Already, it has become apparent that the benefits of digital data management and analysis lie in the central storage of data and reusability of the results. Therefore, we intend to adapt the analysis system to other types of tumors in radiation oncology.
PURPOSE: Especially in the field of radiation oncology, handling a large variety of voluminous datasets from various information systems in different documentation styles efficiently is crucial for patient care and research. To date, conducting retrospective clinical analyses is rather difficult and time consuming. With the example of patients with pancreatic cancer treated with radio-chemotherapy, we performed a therapy evaluation by using an analysis system connected with a documentation system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total number of 783 patients have been documented into a professional, database-based documentation system. Information about radiation therapy, diagnostic images and dose distributions have been imported into the web-based system. RESULTS: For 36 patients with disease progression after neoadjuvant chemoradiation, we designed and established an analysis workflow. After an automatic registration of the radiation plans with the follow-up images, the recurrence volumes are segmented manually. Based on these volumes the DVH (dose volume histogram) statistic is calculated, followed by the determination of the dose applied to the region of recurrence. All results are saved in the database and included in statistical calculations. CONCLUSION: The main goal of using an automatic analysis tool is to reduce time and effort conducting clinical analyses, especially with large patient groups. We showed a first approach and use of some existing tools, however manual interaction is still necessary. Further steps need to be taken to enhance automation. Already, it has become apparent that the benefits of digital data management and analysis lie in the central storage of data and reusability of the results. Therefore, we intend to adapt the analysis system to other types of tumors in radiation oncology.
Authors: Nicholas R Anderson; E Sally Lee; J Scott Brockenbrough; Mark E Minie; Sherrilynne Fuller; James Brinkley; Peter Tarczy-Hornoch Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2007-04-25 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Felix Heinemann; Fred Röhner; Marianne Schmucker; Gregor Bruggmoser; Karl Henne; Anca-Ligia Grosu; Hermann Frommhold Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2009-03-28 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Richard Buchsbaum; Petra Kaufmann; Alexandra I Barsdorf; Rachel Arbing; Jacqueline Montes; John L P Thompson Journal: Amyotroph Lateral Scler Date: 2009 Oct-Dec
Authors: S E Combs; D Habermehl; K Kessel; F Bergmann; J Werner; I Brecht; P Schirmacher; D Jäger; M W Büchler; J Debus Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2013-07-31 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: E Fokas; C Eccles; N Patel; K-Y Chu; S Warren; W Gillies McKenna; T B Brunner Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2013-04-05 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Stephanie E Combs; Manjit Djosanjh; Richad Pötter; Roberto Orrechia; Thomas Haberer; Marco Durante; Piero Fossati; Katia Parodi; Jacques Balosso; Ugo Amaldi; Michael Baumann; Jürgen Debus Journal: J Radiat Res Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 2.724
Authors: Kerstin A Kessel; Daniel Habermehl; Andreas Jäger; Ralf O Floca; Lanlan Zhang; Rolf Bendl; Jürgen Debus; Stephanie E Combs Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2013-06-07 Impact factor: 3.481