R Fietkau1, W Budach, N Zamboglou, H-J Thiel, H Sack, W Popp. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Erlangen University Hospital, Universitätsstr. 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. rainer.fietkau@uk-erlangen.de
Abstract
PURPOSE: The goal was to develop and evaluate a modular system for measurement of the work times required by the various professional groups involved in radiation oncology before, during, and after serial radiation treatment (long-term irradiation with 25-28 fractions of 1.8 Gy) based on the example of rectal cancer treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A panel of experts divided the work associated with providing radiation oncology treatment into modules (from the preparation of radiotherapy, RT planning and administration to the final examination and follow-up). The time required for completion of each module was measured by independent observers at four centers (Rostock, Bamberg, Düsseldorf, and Offenbach, Germany). RESULTS: A total of 1,769 data sets were collected from 63 patients with 10-489 data sets per module. Some modules (informed consent procedure, routine treatments, CT planning) exhibited little deviation between centers, whereas others (especially medical and physical irradiation planning) exhibited a wide range of variation (e.g., 1 h 49 min to 6 h 56 min for physical irradiation planning). The mean work time per patient was 12 h 11 min for technicians, 2 h 59 min for physicists, and 7 h 6 min for physicians. CONCLUSION: The modular system of time measurement proved to be reliable and produced comparable data at the different centers. Therefore, the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) decided that it can be extended to other types of cancer (head and neck, prostate, and breast cancer) with appropriate modifications.
PURPOSE: The goal was to develop and evaluate a modular system for measurement of the work times required by the various professional groups involved in radiation oncology before, during, and after serial radiation treatment (long-term irradiation with 25-28 fractions of 1.8 Gy) based on the example of rectal cancer treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A panel of experts divided the work associated with providing radiation oncology treatment into modules (from the preparation of radiotherapy, RT planning and administration to the final examination and follow-up). The time required for completion of each module was measured by independent observers at four centers (Rostock, Bamberg, Düsseldorf, and Offenbach, Germany). RESULTS: A total of 1,769 data sets were collected from 63 patients with 10-489 data sets per module. Some modules (informed consent procedure, routine treatments, CT planning) exhibited little deviation between centers, whereas others (especially medical and physical irradiation planning) exhibited a wide range of variation (e.g., 1 h 49 min to 6 h 56 min for physical irradiation planning). The mean work time per patient was 12 h 11 min for technicians, 2 h 59 min for physicists, and 7 h 6 min for physicians. CONCLUSION: The modular system of time measurement proved to be reliable and produced comparable data at the different centers. Therefore, the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) decided that it can be extended to other types of cancer (head and neck, prostate, and breast cancer) with appropriate modifications.
Authors: Evelyn Van de Werf; Yolande Lievens; Jan Verstraete; Kris Pauwels; Walter Van den Bogaert Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2009-09-03 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Sara Y Brucker; Markus Wallwiener; Rolf Kreienberg; Walter Jonat; Matthias W Beckmann; Michael Bamberg; Diethelm Wallwiener; Rainer Souchon Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2011-01-21 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Søren M Bentzen; Germaine Heeren; Brian Cottier; Ben Slotman; Bengt Glimelius; Yolande Lievens; Walter van den Bogaert Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2005-03-16 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Gregor Goldner; Samir Sljivic; Renee Oismueller; Johanna Salinger; Michael Mittermüller; Tanja Langsenlehner; Walter Harder; Gerhard Kametriser; Helmut Eiter; Elisabeth Nechvile Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2011-04-26 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: K A Kessel; D Habermehl; C Bohn; A Jäger; R O Floca; L Zhang; N Bougatf; R Bendl; J Debus; S E Combs Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2012-10-31 Impact factor: 3.621