BACKGROUND/AIMS: In order to prevent reflux esophagitis after proximal gastrectomy, reconstruction by jejunal interposition (EJ) is often performed; however, this procedure is considered to be extremely complex. The purpose of this research is to consider the indication and usefulness of esophagogastrostomy (EG), as a less-invasive method of reconstruction. METHODOLOGY: From 1999, 64 proximal gastrectomy cases have been reviewed. In 46 cases, EG combined with a reflux prevention procedure was performed while in the remaining 18 cases, EJ was performed. An endoscopic examination was conducted 1 year after surgery in all cases. RESULTS: Compared to EJ, EG required less surgical time, thus resulting in less blood loss. Reflux esophagitis was frequently present in the EG cases (22 vs. 11%). In the EG group, 36 cases involving abdominal esophagus (AE) conservation due to the site of the cancer in comparison to the resection group (10), experienced a lower probability of reflux esophagitis (5.6 vs. 60%) and endoscopic examinations showed a lower severity (Grade B,C,D; 0 vs. 50%). CONCLUSIONS: EG combined with a reflux prevention procedure is simple and less invasive. In cases in which the conservation of AE is possible, less reflux esophagitis is observed and EG is therefore recommended as an appropriate reconstruction method.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: In order to prevent reflux esophagitis after proximal gastrectomy, reconstruction by jejunal interposition (EJ) is often performed; however, this procedure is considered to be extremely complex. The purpose of this research is to consider the indication and usefulness of esophagogastrostomy (EG), as a less-invasive method of reconstruction. METHODOLOGY: From 1999, 64 proximal gastrectomy cases have been reviewed. In 46 cases, EG combined with a reflux prevention procedure was performed while in the remaining 18 cases, EJ was performed. An endoscopic examination was conducted 1 year after surgery in all cases. RESULTS: Compared to EJ, EG required less surgical time, thus resulting in less blood loss. Reflux esophagitis was frequently present in the EG cases (22 vs. 11%). In the EG group, 36 cases involving abdominal esophagus (AE) conservation due to the site of the cancer in comparison to the resection group (10), experienced a lower probability of reflux esophagitis (5.6 vs. 60%) and endoscopic examinations showed a lower severity (Grade B,C,D; 0 vs. 50%). CONCLUSIONS: EG combined with a reflux prevention procedure is simple and less invasive. In cases in which the conservation of AE is possible, less reflux esophagitis is observed and EG is therefore recommended as an appropriate reconstruction method.
Authors: Nam-Ryong Choi; Min Ha Choi; Chang Seok Ko; Inseob Lee; Chung Sik Gong; Beom Su Kim Journal: Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Date: 2020-04-05 Impact factor: 1.195