Literature DB >> 33456999

Short and long-term outcomes after proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction for Siewert type III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: a propensity score matching study from a 10-year experience in a high-volume hospital.

Fei Ma1, Dandan Guo2, Bin Zhang1, Yonglei Zhang1, Liangqun Peng1, Qi Ma1, Sheqing Ji1, Junhui Chai1, Yawei Hua1, Xiaobing Chen3, Hui Wang3, Shuning Xu3, Suxia Luo3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy (PG) are both surgical options for the treatment of Siewert type III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). Currently there is no consensus on selecting which procedure to perform; in particular, there are few reports of long-term outcomes for patients with local advanced AEG. The aim of this study was to validate the usefulness of PG with double-tract reconstruction in Siewert type III AEG.
METHODS: The clinical data of patients with Siewert type III AEG underwent PG with double-tract reconstruction (PG-DT) or total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis (TG-RY) at our hospital between October 2010 and October 2018. According to the defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 2,146 cases were enrolled in this study. A 1-to-1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to compare the short and long-term outcomes between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: The operation time was longer in the PG-DT group, and the proportion rates of complications and recovery time was similar in the 2 groups. The rates of maintaining bodyweight and free-fat mass index were significantly higher in patients who underwent PG-DT compared to those who underwent TG-RY. While complications, recovery time and survival are similar between two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Regarding short-term outcomes, PG-DT seemed to be superior in terms of maintaining body weight and skeletal muscle compared to TG-RY, while both had similar complications. It was found that PG-DT enabled a potentially longer survival of pathological stage II and III Siewert type III AEG, although the finding was statistically insignificant. These results may help surgeons to determine the appropriate surgical approach and strategy for patients with early and locally advanced Siewert type III AEG. 2020 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG); digestive tract reconstruction; double-tract reconstruction; proximal gastrectomy (PG)

Year:  2020        PMID: 33456999      PMCID: PMC7807272          DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol        ISSN: 2078-6891


  45 in total

1.  Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma--2nd English edition--response assessment of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for gastric carcinoma: clinical criteria.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Response to Letters Regarding Article, "Clinical Management of Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia: The Role of Left Cardiac Sympathetic Denervation".

Authors:  Gaetano M De Ferrari; Veronica Dusi; Carla Spazzolini; J Martijn Bos; Dominic J Abrams; Charles I Berul; Lia Crotti; Michael Eldar; Maria Kharlap; Asaad Khoury; Andrew D Krahn; Antoine Leenhardt; Christopher R Moir; Attilio Odero; Louise Olde Nordkamp; Thomas Paul; Ferran Rosés I Noguer; Maria Shkolnikova; Jan Till; Arthur A M Wilde; Michael J Ackerman; Peter J Schwartz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  [Comparison of clinical efficacy between proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction and total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for proximal gastric cancer].

Authors:  J Y Fan; F Qian; J J Liu; J Y Liu; B Wu; Y X Wu; P W Yu
Journal:  Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-08-25

4.  Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial. The Surgical Cooperative Group.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; P Fayers; J Fielding; J Craven; J Bancewicz; V Joypaul; P Cook
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Proximal gastric cancer: lymph node metastatic patterns according to different T stages dictate surgical approach.

Authors:  Wu Song; Yuyi Liu; Jinning Ye; Jianjun Peng; Weiling He; Jianhui Chen; Chuangqi Chen; Yulong He
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.628

6.  Reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach: an analysis of our 13-year experience.

Authors:  Masaki Nakamura; Mikihito Nakamori; Toshiyasu Ojima; Masahiro Katsuda; Takeshi Iida; Keiji Hayata; Shuuichi Matsumura; Tomoya Kato; Junya Kitadani; Makoto Iwahashi; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Postoperative development of sarcopenia is a strong predictor of a poor prognosis in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and upper gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kensuke Kudou; Hiroshi Saeki; Yuichiro Nakashima; Shun Sasaki; Tomoko Jogo; Kosuke Hirose; Qingjiang Hu; Yasuo Tsuda; Koichi Kimura; Ryota Nakanishi; Nobuhide Kubo; Koji Ando; Eiji Oki; Tetsuo Ikeda; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy Maintains Body Weight and Skeletal Muscle Better Than Total Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Masahiko Sugiyama; Eiji Oki; Koji Ando; Yuichiro Nakashima; Hiroshi Saeki; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Single-arm confirmatory trial of laparoscopy-assisted total or proximal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group study JCOG1401.

Authors:  Hitoshi Katai; Junki Mizusawa; Hiroshi Katayama; Chikara Kunisaki; Shinichi Sakuramoto; Noriyuki Inaki; Takahiro Kinoshita; Yoshiaki Iwasaki; Kazunari Misawa; Nobuhiro Takiguchi; Masahide Kaji; Hiroshi Okitsu; Takaki Yoshikawa; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 7.701

10.  Clinical Outcome of Modified Laparoscopy-Assisted Proximal Gastrectomy Compared to Conventional Proximal Gastrectomy or Total Gastrectomy for Upper-Third Early Gastric Cancer with Special References to Postoperative Reflux Esophagitis.

Authors:  Yeon-Ju Huh; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Seung-Young Oh; Kyung-Goo Lee; Jun-Young Yang; Hye-Seong Ahn; Yun-Suhk Suh; Seong-Ho Kong; Kuhn-Uk Lee; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.720

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of the prognosis of four different surgical strategies for proximal gastric cancer: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ling Tan; Meng-Ni Ran; Zi-Lin Liu; Ling-Han Tang; Zhou Ma; Zhou He; Zhou Xu; Fang-Han Li; Jiang-Wei Xiao
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Laparoscopic-assisted versus open proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction for Siewert type II-III adenocarcinomas of esophago-gastric junction: a retrospective observational study of short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Xiaoyong Liu; Fei Ma; Liangqun Peng; Shuaibing Lu; Yonglei Zhang; Qi Ma; Sheqing Ji; Zhandong Zhang; Junhui Chai; Yawei Hua; Hui Wang; Qian Li; Suxia Luo; Xiaobing Chen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-04

3.  Clinical Comparison of Proximal Gastrectomy With Double-Tract Reconstruction Versus Total Gastrectomy With Roux-en-Y Anastomosis for Siewert Type II/III Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction.

Authors:  Xiaoming Ma; Mingzuo Zhao; Jian Wang; Haixing Pan; Jianqiang Wu; Chungen Xing
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 3.197

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.