Literature DB >> 30838469

Surgical outcomes and risk assessment for anastomotic complications after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-flap technique for upper-third gastric cancer.

Yoshiaki Shoji1, Souya Nunobe2, Satoshi Ida1, Koshi Kumagai1, Manabu Ohashi1, Takeshi Sano1, Naoki Hiki1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Double-flap technique (DFT) has received increased attention as an anastomotic procedure preventing reflux esophagitis after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) for upper-third gastric cancer. However, incidence of anastomotic stricture still remains high. This study was a retrospective review aimed to demonstrate details of surgical outcomes and to assess risk factors for anastomotic complications using pre-operative CT image after LPG with DFT (LPG-DFT).
METHODS: Patient background data, surgical outcomes, post-operative courses, and complications for patients who underwent LPG-DFT from January 2013 to June 2017 were collected. In addition to the details of short-term outcomes, risk factors for anastomotic stricture and gastroesophageal reflux were analyzed.
RESULTS: The study sample was 147 patients, including 139 patients with upper-third gastric cancer and 8 patients with submucosal tumor of the upper-third stomach. The overall morbidity rate was 12.2% (18/147), and 97.3% (143/147) of the patients achieved R0 resection. Twelve (8.3%) patients required endoscopic balloon dilatation for anastomotic stenosis, and six (4.2%) suffered regurgitation grade ≥ B in the Los Angeles classification. Multivariate analysis revealed that diameter of the esophagus < 18 mm on pre-operative CT image and the presence of short-term complications were found to be independent risk factors for post-operative anastomotic stenosis. No specific risk for gastroesophageal reflux was identified.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence rate of anastomotic complications after LPG-DFT was far lower than that reported after conventional esophagogastrostomy. Alternative anastomotic method may be considered for patients with diameter of the esophagus < 18 mm on pre-operative CT image. Prevention of short-term complications may lessen post-operative stricture.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomosis; Gastrectomy; Laparoscopy; Reflux esophagitis; Stricture

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30838469     DOI: 10.1007/s10120-019-00940-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastric Cancer        ISSN: 1436-3291            Impact factor:   7.701


  21 in total

1.  Endoscopic evaluation of reflux esophagitis after proximal gastrectomy: comparison between esophagogastric anastomosis and jejunal interposition.

Authors:  Masanori Tokunaga; Shigekazu Ohyama; Naoki Hiki; Etsuo Hoshino; Souya Nunobe; Tetsu Fukunaga; Yasuyuki Seto; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  The difficult choice between total and proximal gastrectomy in proximal early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ji Yeong An; Ho Geun Youn; Min Gew Choi; Jae Hyung Noh; Tae Sung Sohn; Sung Kim
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Functional outcomes and quality of life after proximal gastrectomy with esophagogastrostomy using a narrow gastric conduit.

Authors:  Ulrich Ronellenfitsch; Sara Najmeh; Amin Andalib; Rushika M Perera; Mathieu C Rousseau; David S Mulder; Lorenzo E Ferri
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Double-Flap Technique as an Antireflux Procedure in Esophagogastrostomy after Proximal Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Shinji Kuroda; Masahiko Nishizaki; Satoru Kikuchi; Kazuhiro Noma; Shunsuke Tanabe; Shunsuke Kagawa; Yasuhiro Shirakawa; Toshiyoshi Fujiwara
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Laparoscopic double-tract proximal gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Sang-Hoon Ahn; Do Hyun Jung; Sang-Yong Son; Chang-Min Lee; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 7.370

6.  Changes in clinicopathological features and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer over a 20-year period.

Authors:  H S Ahn; H-J Lee; M-W Yoo; S-H Jeong; D-J Park; H-H Kim; W H Kim; K U Lee; H-K Yang
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Stomach carcinoma incidence patterns in the United States by histologic type and anatomic site.

Authors:  Hongyu Wu; Jennifer A Rusiecki; Kangmin Zhu; John Potter; Susan S Devesa
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Laparoscopy-Assisted Proximal Gastrectomy with the Hinged Double Flap Method.

Authors:  Atsushi Muraoka; Masahiko Kobayashi; Yasutaka Kokudo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Gastric cancer treatment in Japan: 2008 annual report of the JGCA nationwide registry.

Authors:  Yoh Isobe; Atsushi Nashimoto; Kohei Akazawa; Ichiro Oda; Kenichi Hayashi; Isao Miyashiro; Hitoshi Katai; Shunichi Tsujitani; Yasuhiro Kodera; Yasuyuki Seto; Michio Kaminishi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 7.370

10.  Functional outcomes by reconstruction technique following laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: double tract versus jejunal interposition.

Authors:  Eiji Nomura; Sang-Woong Lee; Masaru Kawai; Masashi Yamazaki; Kazuhito Nabeshima; Kenji Nakamura; Kazuhisa Uchiyama
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  7 in total

1.  Feasibility and quality of life assessment of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy using double-tract reconstruction.

Authors:  Reo Sato; Takahiro Kinoshita; Eigo Akimoto; Mitsumasa Yoshida; Yukiko Nishiguchi; Junichiro Harada
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Modified side overlap esophagogastrostomy after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Yoshito Yamashita; Taichi Tatsubayashi; Koichi Okumura; Takumi Miyamoto; Kohei Ueno
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2022-01-21

3.  Clinical outcomes of gastric tube reconstruction following laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach: experience with 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Toyomasu; Erito Mochiki; Toru Ishiguro; Tetsuya Ito; Okihide Suzuki; Kyoichi Ogata; Youichi Kumagai; Keiichiro Ishibashi; Hiroshi Saeki; Ken Shirabe; Hideyuki Ishida
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  One stomach, two subtypes of carcinoma-the differences between distal and proximal gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yuan Zhang; Peng-Shan Zhang; Ze-Yin Rong; Chen Huang
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2021-11-15

Review 5.  Current treatments and outlook in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: a narrative review.

Authors:  Fei Cao; Can Hu; Zhi-Yuan Xu; Yan-Qiang Zhang; Ling Huang; Jia-Hui Chen; Jiang-Jiang Qin; Xiang-Dong Cheng
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-03

6.  Clinical Comparison of Proximal Gastrectomy With Double-Tract Reconstruction Versus Total Gastrectomy With Roux-en-Y Anastomosis for Siewert Type II/III Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction.

Authors:  Xiaoming Ma; Mingzuo Zhao; Jian Wang; Haixing Pan; Jianqiang Wu; Chungen Xing
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 3.197

Review 7.  Current status of function-preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Kosuga; Masahiro Tsujiura; Susumu Nakashima; Mamoru Masuyama; Eigo Otsuji
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2021-01-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.