BACKGROUND: Technology-based applications represent a promising method for providing efficacious, widely available interventions to substance abuse treatment patients. However, limited access to communication technology (i.e., mobile phones, computers, internet, and e-mail) could significantly impact the feasibility of these efforts, and little is known regarding technology utilization in substance abusing populations. METHODS: A survey was conducted to characterize utilization of communication technology in 266 urban, substance abuse treatment patients enrolled at eight drug-free, psychosocial or opioid-replacement therapy clinics. RESULTS: Survey participants averaged 41 years of age and 57% had a yearly household income of less than $15,000. The vast majority reported access to a mobile phone (91%), and to SMS text messaging (79%). Keeping a consistent mobile phone number and yearly mobile contract was higher for White participants, and also for those with higher education, and enrolled in drug-free, psychosocial treatment. Internet, e-mail, and computer use was much lower (39-45%), with younger age, higher education and income predicting greater use. No such differences existed for the use of mobile phones however. CONCLUSIONS: Concern regarding the digital divide for marginalized populations appears to be disappearing with respect to mobile phones, but still exists for computer, internet, and e-mail access and use. Results suggest that mobile phone and texting applications may be feasibly applied for use in program-client interactions in substance abuse treatment. Careful consideration should be given to frequent phone number changes, access to technology, and motivation to engage with communication technology for treatment purposes.
BACKGROUND: Technology-based applications represent a promising method for providing efficacious, widely available interventions to substance abuse treatment patients. However, limited access to communication technology (i.e., mobile phones, computers, internet, and e-mail) could significantly impact the feasibility of these efforts, and little is known regarding technology utilization in substance abusing populations. METHODS: A survey was conducted to characterize utilization of communication technology in 266 urban, substance abuse treatment patients enrolled at eight drug-free, psychosocial or opioid-replacement therapy clinics. RESULTS: Survey participants averaged 41 years of age and 57% had a yearly household income of less than $15,000. The vast majority reported access to a mobile phone (91%), and to SMS text messaging (79%). Keeping a consistent mobile phone number and yearly mobile contract was higher for White participants, and also for those with higher education, and enrolled in drug-free, psychosocial treatment. Internet, e-mail, and computer use was much lower (39-45%), with younger age, higher education and income predicting greater use. No such differences existed for the use of mobile phones however. CONCLUSIONS: Concern regarding the digital divide for marginalized populations appears to be disappearing with respect to mobile phones, but still exists for computer, internet, and e-mail access and use. Results suggest that mobile phone and texting applications may be feasibly applied for use in program-client interactions in substance abuse treatment. Careful consideration should be given to frequent phone number changes, access to technology, and motivation to engage with communication technology for treatment purposes.
Authors: Nancy R VanDeMark; Nicole R Burrell; Walter F Lamendola; Catherine A Hoich; Nicole P Berg; Eugene Medina Journal: Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy Date: 2010-06-08
Authors: Van L King; Kenneth B Stoller; Michael Kidorf; Kori Kindbom; Steven Hursh; Thomas Brady; Robert K Brooner Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2008-09-04
Authors: Carmen Rosa; Aimee N C Campbell; Gloria M Miele; Meg Brunner; Erin L Winstanley Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2015-07-12 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Nicole L Tosun; Sharon S Allen; Lynn E Eberly; Meng Yao; William W Stoops; Justin C Strickland; Katherine A Harrison; Mustafa al'Absi; Marilyn E Carroll Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Babak Tofighi; Noelle Leonard; Peter Greco; Aboozar Hadavand; Michelle C Acosta; Joshua D Lee Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2019 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 3.702
Authors: Mary M Sweeney; Olga Rass; Patrick S Johnson; Eric C Strain; Meredith S Berry; Hoa T Vo; Marc J Fishman; Cynthia A Munro; George W Rebok; Miriam Z Mintzer; Matthew W Johnson Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 3.157