Literature DB >> 21471491

Informing and involving patients to improve the quality of medical decisions.

Floyd J Fowler1, Carrie A Levin, Karen R Sepucha.   

Abstract

Good-quality care requires that procedures, treatments, and tests be not only medically appropriate, but also desired by informed patients. Current evidence shows that most medical decisions are made by physicians with little input from patients. This article describes issues surrounding informed patient decision making and the steps necessary to improve the way decisions are made. Creating incentives for providers and health care organizations to inform patients and incorporate patients' goals into decisions is critical. Patient surveys are needed to monitor the quality of decision making. Health information technology can help by collecting information from patients about their symptoms, how well they understand their options, and what is important to them, and sharing that information with providers. We review public and private developments that could facilitate the development of tools and methods to improve patient-centered care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21471491     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  42 in total

1.  Challenges in ductal carcinoma in situ risk communication and decision-making: report from an American Cancer Society and National Cancer Institute workshop.

Authors:  Ann H Partridge; Joann G Elmore; Debbie Saslow; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Stuart J Schnitt
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 2.  Controversies in anaesthesia for noncardiac surgery in older adults.

Authors:  S Murthy; D L Hepner; Z Cooper; A M Bader; M D Neuman
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Improving Breast Cancer Surgical Treatment Decision Making: The iCanDecide Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Yun Li; Lawrence C An; Kenneth Resnicow; Nancy K Janz; Michael S Sabel; Kevin C Ward; Angela Fagerlin; Monica Morrow; Reshma Jagsi; Timothy P Hofer; Steven J Katz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Family presence and participation during medical visits of heart failure patients: An analysis of survey and audiotaped communication data.

Authors:  Crystal W Cené; Beth Haymore; Jeffrey P Laux; Feng-Chang Lin; Dana Carthron; Debra Roter; Lisa A Cooper; Patricia P Chang; Brian C Jensen; Paula F Miller; Giselle Corbie-Smith
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-09-03

5.  Harnessing Information Technology to Inform Patients Facing Routine Decisions: Cancer Screening as a Test Case.

Authors:  Alex H Krist; Steven H Woolf; Camille Hochheimer; Roy T Sabo; Paulette Kashiri; Resa M Jones; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Rebecca S Etz; Shin-Ping Tu
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Impact of a randomized controlled educational trial to improve physician practice behaviors around screening for inherited breast cancer.

Authors:  Robert A Bell; Haley McDermott; Tonya L Fancher; Michael J Green; Frank C Day; Michael S Wilkes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Estimating and communicating prognosis in advanced neurologic disease.

Authors:  Robert G Holloway; Robert Gramling; Adam G Kelly
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Association of patient preferences for participation in decision making with length of stay and costs among hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Hyo Jung Tak; Gregory W Ruhnke; David O Meltzer
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 9.  Preceding the procedure: medical devices and shared decision making.

Authors:  Julian J Prokopetz; Jeffrey N Katz; Elena Losina; Thomas S Thornhill; John Wright; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.794

10.  Improving Patients' Choice of Clinician by Including Roll-up Measures in Public Healthcare Quality Reports: an Online Experiment.

Authors:  Jennifer L Cerully; Andrew M Parker; Lise Rybowski; Mark Schlesinger; Dale Shaller; Rachel Grob; Melissa L Finucane; Steven C Martino
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.