Literature DB >> 23107081

Cervical lidocaine for IUD insertional pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Colleen P McNicholas1, Tessa Madden, Qiuhong Zhao, Gina Secura, Jenifer E Allsworth, Jeffrey F Peipert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Anticipated pain with intrauterine device (IUD) insertion may be a barrier to widespread use. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of intracervical 2% lidocaine gel for pain relief with IUD insertion. STUDY
DESIGN: We performed a double-blind, randomized controlled trial of women undergoing IUD insertion. Participants were randomly assigned to 2% lidocaine or placebo gel. Study gel (3 mL) was placed 3 minutes prior to IUD insertion. Pain scores were measured at various time points using a 10-point visual analog scale.
RESULTS: Of the 200 participants randomized, 199 completed the study. Pain scores among lidocaine and placebo arms were similar at tenaculum placement (lidocaine and placebo: median, 4; range, 0-10; P = .15) and with insertion (lidocaine: median, 5; range, 1-10; placebo: median, 6; range, 0-10; P = .16). These results did not differ by parity.
CONCLUSION: Topical or intracervical 2% lidocaine gel prior to IUD insertion does not decrease pain scores.
Copyright © 2012 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23107081      PMCID: PMC3492878          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.09.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  28 in total

1.  Use of the Mirena LNG-IUS and Paragard CuT380A intrauterine devices in nulliparous women.

Authors:  Richard Lyus; Patricia Lohr; Sarah Prager
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  What is it about intrauterine devices that women find unacceptable? Factors that make women non-users: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Claire Asker; Helen Stokes-Lampard; Jackie Beavan; Sue Wilson
Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care       Date:  2006-04

3.  Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Stanley K Henshaw
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2006-06

4.  The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Gina M Secura; Jenifer E Allsworth; Tessa Madden; Jennifer L Mullersman; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  ACOG Committee Opinion no. 450: Increasing use of contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 6.  Copper-containing, framed intrauterine devices for contraception: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Paul A O'Brien; Regina Kulier; Frans M Helmerhorst; Margaret Usher-Patel; Catherine d'Arcangues
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 7.  Copper containing, framed intra-uterine devices for contraception.

Authors:  R Kulier; P A O'Brien; F M Helmerhorst; M Usher-Patel; C D'Arcangues
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17

8.  Cervical priming with sublingual misoprostol prior to insertion of an intrauterine device in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  I Sääv; A Aronsson; L Marions; O Stephansson; K Gemzell-Danielsson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 9.  Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion.

Authors:  Rebecca H Allen; Deborah Bartz; David A Grimes; David Hubacher; Paul O'Brien
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

10.  Intrauterine contraception in Saint Louis: a survey of obstetrician and gynecologists' knowledge and attitudes.

Authors:  Tessa Madden; Jenifer E Allsworth; Katherine J Hladky; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  6 in total

1.  Role of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system in effective contraception.

Authors:  Abdelhamid M Attia; Magdy M Ibrahim; Ahmed M Abou-Setta
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 2.  Practical advice for avoidance of pain associated with insertion of intrauterine contraceptives.

Authors:  Luis Bahamondes; Diana Mansour; Christian Fiala; Andrew M Kaunitz; Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson
Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care       Date:  2013-09-27

3.  Cold Compress for Intrauterine Device Insertional Pain: A Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Jordan Hylton; Sarah Milton; Adam P Sima; Nicole W Karjane
Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-08-04

Review 4.  Management of pain associated with the insertion of intrauterine contraceptives.

Authors:  K Gemzell-Danielsson; D Mansour; C Fiala; A M Kaunitz; L Bahamondes
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 5.  Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion.

Authors:  Laureen M Lopez; Alissa Bernholc; Yanwu Zeng; Rebecca H Allen; Deborah Bartz; Paul A O'Brien; David Hubacher
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-29

Review 6.  New developments in intrauterine device use: focus on the US.

Authors:  Anita L Nelson; Natasha Massoudi
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2016-09-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.