Literature DB >> 15546300

Endocardial pacemaker implantation in infants weighing < or = 10 kilograms.

Janneke A E Kammeraad1, Eric Rosenthal, Julian Bostock, Jon Rogers, Narayanswami Sreeram.   

Abstract

Epicardial pacemaker implantation is the most common approach for small children requiring pacemaker implantation, though it is not free from complications. This article reviews the experience with endocardial pacemaker implantation, as an alternative approach, in children < or =10 kg at two centers. Thirty-nine children, median age 3.8 months (2 days-35 months), weight 4.6 kg (2.3-10 kg) underwent endocardial permanent pacing (VVI/R in 38, DDDR in 1). Indications for pacing were complete heart block (CHB) in 34 (congenital in 21, postsurgical in 12, congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries 1), long QT syndrome in 3, and sinus bradycardia in 2 children. Two children with postsurgical CHB died 7 days and 3 weeks after implantation, respectively, due to heart failure and septicemia, despite appropriate pacemaker therapy. Over a median follow-up of 4.3 years (9 months-15.3 years), 12 patients underwent 18 generator replacements. Five patients were upgraded to physiological pacing. Ten patients underwent 12 ventricular lead advancements. Ventricular lead extraction was attempted 11 times in nine patients and succeeded 10 times. Two patients were converted to epicardial dual chamber systems. Two prepectorally placed generators required resiting due to threatened skin necrosis. Infective endocarditis on the lead, 9 months postimplant required removal of the system in one patient. The subclavian vein was found to be asymptomatically thrombosed in four patients. Endocardial permanent pacing is feasible and effective in children < or = 10 kg and an acceptable alternative to epicardial pacing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15546300     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00663.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of modern steroid-eluting epicardial and thin transvenous pacemaker leads in pediatric and congenital heart disease patients.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Fortescue; Charles I Berul; Frank Cecchin; Edward P Walsh; John K Triedman; Mark E Alexander
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Permanent cardiac pacing in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Wael Lotfy; Ranya Hegazy; Osama AbdElAziz; Rodina Sobhy; Hossam Hasanein; Fawzan Shaltout
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 3.  Pacing device therapy in infants and children: a review.

Authors:  Daiji Takeuchi; Yasuko Tomizawa
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 1.731

4.  Successful Implantation of Transvenous Pacing System via Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava and Coronary Sinus in Small Children.

Authors:  Mohammad Dalili; Abolfath Alizadeh; Majid Haghjoo
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2011-02-07

5.  Endocardial pacemaker implantation in neonates and infants.

Authors:  Canan Ayabakan; Eric Rosenthal
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2006-04-01

Review 6.  Congenital and childhood atrioventricular blocks: pathophysiology and contemporary management.

Authors:  Alban-Elouen Baruteau; Robert H Pass; Jean-Benoit Thambo; Albin Behaghel; Solène Le Pennec; Elodie Perdreau; Nicolas Combes; Leonardo Liberman; Christopher J McLeod
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.183

7.  Original Article--Outcomes of Pacing in Egyptian Pediatric Population.

Authors:  Ahmed Nabil Ali; Samir S Wafa; Hosni Hosni Arafa; Rania Samir
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-04-15

8.  Cardiac pacing and defibrillation in children and young adults.

Authors:  Harinder R Singh; Anjan S Batra; Seshadri Balaji
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2013-01-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.