Literature DB >> 23103963

A supramodal accumulation-to-bound signal that determines perceptual decisions in humans.

Redmond G O'Connell1, Paul M Dockree, Simon P Kelly.   

Abstract

In theoretical accounts of perceptual decision-making, a decision variable integrates noisy sensory evidence and determines action through a boundary-crossing criterion. Signals bearing these very properties have been characterized in single neurons in monkeys, but have yet to be directly identified in humans. Using a gradual target detection task, we isolated a freely evolving decision variable signal in human subjects that exhibited every aspect of the dynamics observed in its single-neuron counterparts. This signal could be continuously tracked in parallel with fully dissociable sensory encoding and motor preparation signals, and could be systematically perturbed mid-flight during decision formation. Furthermore, we found that the signal was completely domain general: it exhibited the same decision-predictive dynamics regardless of sensory modality and stimulus features and tracked cumulative evidence even in the absence of overt action. These findings provide a uniquely clear view on the neural determinants of simple perceptual decisions in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23103963     DOI: 10.1038/nn.3248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  33 in total

Review 1.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles.

Authors:  G Pfurtscheller; F H Lopes da Silva
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 2.  Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions.

Authors:  Philip L Smith; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  A general mechanism for perceptual decision-making in the human brain.

Authors:  H R Heekeren; S Marrett; P A Bandettini; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Neuropsychology and neuropharmacology of P3a and P3b.

Authors:  John Polich; José R Criado
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Trial-by-trial fluctuations in the event-related electroencephalogram reflect dynamic changes in the degree of surprise.

Authors:  Rogier B Mars; Stefan Debener; Thomas E Gladwin; Lee M Harrison; Patrick Haggard; John C Rothwell; Sven Bestmann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Quality of evidence for perceptual decision making is indexed by trial-to-trial variability of the EEG.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Marios G Philiastides; Paul Sajda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Buildup of choice-predictive activity in human motor cortex during perceptual decision making.

Authors:  Tobias H Donner; Markus Siegel; Pascal Fries; Andreas K Engel
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 8.  A general mechanism for decision-making in the human brain?

Authors:  Alan E Rorie; William T Newsome
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  M N Shadlen; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Representation of confidence associated with a decision by neurons in the parietal cortex.

Authors:  Roozbeh Kiani; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  200 in total

Review 1.  Dynamics of individual perceptual decisions.

Authors:  Daniel M Merfeld; Torin K Clark; Yue M Lu; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Lesions to the left lateral prefrontal cortex impair decision threshold adjustment for lexical selection.

Authors:  Royce Anders; Stéphanie Riès; Leendert Van Maanen; F-Xavier Alario
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  ERPs predict symptomatic distress and recovery in sub-acute mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  James F Cavanagh; J Kevin Wilson; Rebecca E Rieger; Darbi Gill; James M Broadway; Jacqueline Hope Story Remer; Violet Fratzke; Andrew R Mayer; Davin K Quinn
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Simultaneous EEG-fMRI reveals temporal evolution of coupling between supramodal cortical attention networks and the brainstem.

Authors:  Jennifer M Walz; Robin I Goldman; Michael Carapezza; Jordan Muraskin; Truman R Brown; Paul Sajda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Neural chronometry and coherency across speed-accuracy demands reveal lack of homomorphism between computational and neural mechanisms of evidence accumulation.

Authors:  Richard P Heitz; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  A key role for stimulus-specific updating of the sensory cortices in the learning of stimulus-reward associations.

Authors:  Berry van den Berg; Benjamin R Geib; Rene San Martín; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Dynamics of neural population responses in prefrontal cortex indicate changes of mind on single trials.

Authors:  Roozbeh Kiani; Christopher J Cueva; John B Reppas; William T Newsome
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  How attention influences perceptual decision making: Single-trial EEG correlates of drift-diffusion model parameters.

Authors:  Michael D Nunez; Joachim Vandekerckhove; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 2.223

9.  Having More Choices Changes How Human Observers Weight Stable Sensory Evidence.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Sean Deering; Annalisa M Salazar; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith; Scott D Brown; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.