PURPOSE: We conceived and proposed a unique and optimized nomogram to predict cancer specific survival after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma by merging the 2 largest multicenter data sets reported in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The international and the French national collaborative groups on upper tract urothelial carcinoma pooled data on 3,387 patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy for whom full data for nomogram development were available. The merged study population was randomly split into the development cohort (2,371) and the external validation cohort (1,016). Cox regressions were used for univariable and multivariable analyses, and to build different models. The ultimate reduced nomogram was assessed using Harrell's concordance index (c-index) and decision curve analysis. RESULTS: Of the 2,371 patients in the nomogram development cohort 510 (21.5%) died of upper tract urothelial carcinoma during followup. The actuarial cancer specific survival probability at 5 years was 73.7% (95% CI 71.9-75.6). Decision curve analysis revealed that the use of the best model was associated with benefit gains relative to the prediction of cancer specific survival. The optimized nomogram included only 5 variables associated with cancer specific survival on multivariable analysis, those of age (p = 0.001), T stage (p <0.001), N stage (p = 0.001), architecture (p = 0.02) and lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.001). The discriminative accuracy of the nomogram was 0.8 (95% CI 0.77-0.86). CONCLUSIONS: Using standard pathological features obtained from the largest data set of upper tract urothelial carcinomas worldwide, we devised and validated an accurate and ultimate nomogram, superior to any single clinical variable, for predicting cancer specific survival after radical nephroureterectomy.
PURPOSE: We conceived and proposed a unique and optimized nomogram to predict cancer specific survival after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma by merging the 2 largest multicenter data sets reported in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The international and the French national collaborative groups on upper tract urothelial carcinoma pooled data on 3,387 patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy for whom full data for nomogram development were available. The merged study population was randomly split into the development cohort (2,371) and the external validation cohort (1,016). Cox regressions were used for univariable and multivariable analyses, and to build different models. The ultimate reduced nomogram was assessed using Harrell's concordance index (c-index) and decision curve analysis. RESULTS: Of the 2,371 patients in the nomogram development cohort 510 (21.5%) died of upper tract urothelial carcinoma during followup. The actuarial cancer specific survival probability at 5 years was 73.7% (95% CI 71.9-75.6). Decision curve analysis revealed that the use of the best model was associated with benefit gains relative to the prediction of cancer specific survival. The optimized nomogram included only 5 variables associated with cancer specific survival on multivariable analysis, those of age (p = 0.001), T stage (p <0.001), N stage (p = 0.001), architecture (p = 0.02) and lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.001). The discriminative accuracy of the nomogram was 0.8 (95% CI 0.77-0.86). CONCLUSIONS: Using standard pathological features obtained from the largest data set of upper tract urothelial carcinomas worldwide, we devised and validated an accurate and ultimate nomogram, superior to any single clinical variable, for predicting cancer specific survival after radical nephroureterectomy.
Authors: Pierre Colin; Tarek P Ghoneim; Laurent Nison; Thomas Seisen; Eric Lechevallier; Xavier Cathelineau; Adil Ouzzane; Marc Zerbib; Jean-Alexandre Long; Alain Ruffion; Sébastien Crouzet; Olivier Cussenot; Marie Audouin; Jacques Irani; Solène Gardic; Pascal Gres; François Audenet; Mathieu Roumiguié; Antoine Valeri; Morgan Rouprêt Journal: World J Urol Date: 2013-06-29 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Matthew R Danzig; Katherine Mallin; James M McKiernan; Walter M Stadler; Srikala S Sridhar; Todd M Morgan; Bernard H Bochner; Cheryl T Lee Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Francesco Soria; Marco Moschini; Andrea Haitel; Gregory J Wirth; Jose A Karam; Christopher G Wood; Morgan Rouprêt; Vitaly Margulis; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Alberto Briganti; Jay D Raman; Solene-Florence Kammerer-Jacquet; Romain Mathieu; Karim Bensalah; Yair Lotan; Mehmet Özsoy; Mesut Remzi; Kilian M Gust; Shahrokh F Shariat Journal: World J Urol Date: 2016-06-07 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Aurélie Mbeutcha; Morgan Rouprêt; Ashish M Kamat; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Giacomo Novara; Jay D Raman; Christian Seitz; Evanguelos Xylinas; Shahrokh F Shariat Journal: World J Urol Date: 2016-04-21 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Sophie Hurel; Morgan Rouprêt; Thomas Seisen; Eva Comperat; Véronique Phé; Stéphane Droupy; François Audenet; Géraldine Pignot; Xavier Cathelineau; Laurent Guy; Olivier Cussenot; Adil Ouzzane; Gregory Bozzini; Laurent Nison; Alain Ruffion; Pierre Colin Journal: World J Urol Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Aurélie Mbeutcha; Ilaria Lucca; Vitaly Margulis; Jose A Karam; Christopher G Wood; Michela de Martino; Romain Mathieu; Andrea Haitel; Evanguelos Xylinas; Luis Kluth; Morgan Rouprêt; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Alberto Briganti; Michael Rink; Malte Rieken; Alon Z Weizer; Jay D Raman; Nathalie Rioux-Leclecq; Christian Bolenz; Karim Bensalah; Yair Lotan; Christian Seitz; Mesut Remzi; Shahrokh F Shariat; Tobias Klatte Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-12-11 Impact factor: 4.226