Literature DB >> 23103789

1 Hz rTMS of the left posterior parietal cortex (PPC) modifies sensorimotor timing.

Vanessa Krause1, Shahid Bashir, Bettina Pollok, Anuhya Caipa, Alfons Schnitzler, Alvaro Pascual-Leone.   

Abstract

In order to investigate the relevance of the left posterior parietal cortex (PPC) for precise sensorimotor timing we applied 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over left PPC, right PPC and visual cortex of healthy participants for 10 min, respectively. The impact on sensorimotor timing of the right hand was assessed using a synchronization task that required subjects to synchronize their right index finger taps with respect to constant auditory, visual or auditory-visual pacing. Our results reveal reduced negative tap-to-pacer asynchronies following rTMS of the left PPC in all pacing conditions. This effect lasted for about 5 min after cessation of rTMS. Right PPC and visual cortex stimulation did not yield any significant behavioural effects. Since suppression of left PPC modified right-hand synchronization accuracy independent of the pacing signal's modality, the present data support the significance of left PPC for anticipatory motor control over a primary role in multisensory integration. The present data suggest that 1 Hz rTMS might interrupt a matching process of anticipated and real sensorimotor feedback within PPC. Alternatively, downregulation of left PPC activity may affect M1 excitability via functional connections leading to a delay in motor output and, thus, smaller tap-to-pacer asynchronies.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23103789      PMCID: PMC3951774          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  44 in total

1.  The attentional role of the left parietal cortex: the distinct lateralization and localization of motor attention in the human brain.

Authors:  M F Rushworth; M Krams; R E Passingham
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Inter- and intra-individual variability of paired-pulse curves with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

Authors:  Fumiko Maeda; Massimo Gangitano; Mark Thall; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Cerebral dominance for action in the human brain: the selection of actions.

Authors:  N D Schluter; M Krams; M F Rushworth; R E Passingham
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Complementary localization and lateralization of orienting and motor attention.

Authors:  M F Rushworth; A Ellison; V Walsh
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 5.  The cerebellum and event timing.

Authors:  Richard B Ivry; Rebecca M Spencer; Howard N Zelaznik; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 6.  Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Richard A Andersen; Christopher A Buneo
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03-27       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  Dynamic interactions in the fronto-parietal network during a manual stimulus-response compatibility task.

Authors:  Edna C Cieslik; Karl Zilles; Christian Grefkes; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  Studies of human motor physiology with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  R Chen
Journal:  Muscle Nerve Suppl       Date:  2000

9.  Cortical activations during paced finger-tapping applying visual and auditory pacing stimuli.

Authors:  L Jäncke; R Loose; K Lutz; K Specht; N J Shah
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2000-09

10.  Self-induced versus reactive triggering of synchronous movements in a deafferented patient and control subjects.

Authors:  P Stenneken; G Aschersleben; J Cole; W Prinz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2002-02
View more
  8 in total

1.  Age-related changes in the bimanual advantage and in brain oscillatory activity during tapping movements suggest a decline in processing sensory reafference.

Authors:  Etienne Sallard; Lucas Spierer; Catherine Ludwig; Marie-Pierre Deiber; Jérôme Barral
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  How Do You Feel the Rhythm: Dynamic Motor-Auditory Interactions Are Involved in the Imagination of Hierarchical Timing.

Authors:  Tzu-Han Zoe Cheng; Sarah C Creel; John R Iversen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 6.709

Review 3.  The interactions of multisensory integration with endogenous and exogenous attention.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Tang; Jinglong Wu; Yong Shen
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied to the left dorsolateral premotor cortex (dPMC) interferes with rhythm reproduction.

Authors:  B Pollok; C L Overhagen; A Keitel; V Krause
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The Posterior Parietal Cortex Subserves Precise Motor Timing in Professional Drummers.

Authors:  Bettina Pollok; Katharina Stephan; Ariane Keitel; Vanessa Krause; Nora K Schaal
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Hypogravity reduces trunk admittance and lumbar muscle activation in response to external perturbations.

Authors:  Enrico De Martino; Sauro E Salomoni; Andrew Winnard; Kristofor McCarty; Kirsty Lindsay; Sherveen Riazati; Tobias Weber; Jonathan Scott; David A Green; Julie Hides; Dorothée Debuse; Paul W Hodges; Jaap H van Dieën; Nick Caplan
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2020-03-12

7.  Distinct β Band Oscillatory Networks Subserving Motor and Cognitive Control during Gait Adaptation.

Authors:  Johanna Wagner; Scott Makeig; Mateusz Gola; Christa Neuper; Gernot Müller-Putz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  High post-movement parietal low-beta power during rhythmic tapping facilitates performance in a stop task.

Authors:  Petra Fischer; Huiling Tan; Alek Pogosyan; Peter Brown
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.386

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.