Literature DB >> 11163368

Cerebral dominance for action in the human brain: the selection of actions.

N D Schluter1, M Krams, M F Rushworth, R E Passingham.   

Abstract

PET was used to study cerebral dominance for the selection of action. In one condition the subjects moved one of two fingers depending on the cue presented (choice reaction time), and in another they moved the same finger whatever the cue (simple reaction time). There was also a baseline condition in which cues were shown but no movements were made. A conjunction analysis was performed to reveal those areas which were more activated for the choice versus simple reaction time, irrespective of whether the right or left hand was used. The activations were in prefrontal, premotor and intraparietal areas, and they were all in the left hemisphere. Thus, while there were activations in the right hemisphere for the choice versus simple reaction time task when the subjects used their left (contralateral) hand, there were activations in left prefrontal, premotor and parietal areas whether the right (contralateral) or left (ipsilateral) hands were used. It is argued that the results suggest that the left hemisphere is dominant not only for speech but also for action in general.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11163368     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00105-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  72 in total

1.  Effects of direction on saccadic performance in relation to lateral preferences.

Authors:  T S Constantinidis; N Smyrnis; I Evdokimidis; N C Stefanis; D Avramopoulos; I Giouzelis; C N Stefanis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The role of ipsilateral premotor cortex in hand movement after stroke.

Authors:  Heidi Johansen-Berg; Matthew F S Rushworth; Marko D Bogdanovic; Udo Kischka; Sunil Wimalaratna; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Apraxia impairs intentional retrieval of incidentally acquired motor knowledge.

Authors:  Anna Dovern; Gereon R Fink; Jochen Saliger; Hans Karbe; Iring Koch; Peter H Weiss
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Temporal dynamics of ipsilateral and contralateral motor activity during voluntary finger movement.

Authors:  Ming-Xiong Huang; Deborah L Harrington; Kim M Paulson; Michael P Weisend; Roland R Lee
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Proprioceptive reaction times and long-latency reflexes in humans.

Authors:  C D Manning; S A Tolhurst; P Bawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Hemispheric asymmetries of motor versus nonmotor processes during (visuo)motor control.

Authors:  Dorothée V Callaert; Katrien Vercauteren; Ronald Peeters; Fred Tam; Simon Graham; Stephan P Swinnen; Stefan Sunaert; Nicole Wenderoth
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of posterior parietal cortex affects decisions of hand choice.

Authors:  Flavio T P Oliveira; Jörn Diedrichsen; Timothy Verstynen; Julie Duque; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Can prepared responses be stored subcortically?

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Romeo Chua; J Timothy Inglis; David J Sanderson; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Contributions of the parietal cortex to increased efficiency of planning-based action selection.

Authors:  Jennifer Randerath; Kenneth F Valyear; Benjamin A Philip; Scott H Frey
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Surround inhibition is modulated by task difficulty.

Authors:  S Beck; M Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.