Literature DB >> 10978692

Cortical activations during paced finger-tapping applying visual and auditory pacing stimuli.

L Jäncke1, R Loose, K Lutz, K Specht, N J Shah.   

Abstract

In order to study neural systems which are involved in motor timing we used whole-brain functional resonance imaging while subjects performed a paced finger-tapping task (PFT) with their right index finger. During one condition, subjects were imaged while tapping in synchrony with tones separated by a constant interval (auditory synchronisation, AS), followed by tapping without the pacing stimulus (auditory continuation, AC). In another condition, subjects were imaged while tapping in synchrony with a visual stimulus presented at the same frequency as the tones (visual synchronisation, VS) followed by a tapping sequence without visual pacing (visual continuation, VC). The following main results were obtained: (1) tapping in the context of visual pacing was generally more variable than tapping in the context of auditory stimuli; (2) during all conditions, a fronto-parietal network was active including the dorsal lateral premotor cortex (dPMC), M1, S1, inferior parietal lobule (LPi), supplementary motor cortex (SMA), the right cerebellar hemisphere, and the paravermial region; (3) stronger activation in the bilateral ventral premotor cortex (vPMC), the left LPi, the SMA, the right inferior cerebellum, and the left thalamus during both auditory conditions (AS and AC) compared to the visual conditions (VS and VC); (4) stronger activation in the right superior cerebellum, the vermis, and the right LPi during the visual conditions (VS and VC); (5) similar activations for the AS and AC conditions; but (6) marked differences between the VS and VC conditions especially in the dorsal premotor cortex (dPMC) and LPi areas; and (7) finally, there were no activations in the auditory and visual cortices when the pacing stimuli were absent. These findings were taken as evidence for a general difference between the motor control modes operative during the auditory and visual conditions. Paced finger tapping in the context of auditory pacing stimuli relies more on brain structures subserving internal motor control while paced finger-tapping in the context of visual pacing stimuli relies on brain structures relying on the subserving processing or imagination of visual pacing stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10978692     DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(00)00022-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  94 in total

1.  Timing of cortical activation: a latency-resolved event-related functional MR imaging study.

Authors:  Mona A Mohamed; David M Yousem; Aylin Tekes; Nina M Browner; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Tactile stimulus predictability modulates activity in a tactile-motor cortical network.

Authors:  A J Nelson; W R Staines; W E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A prospective functional MR imaging study of mild traumatic brain injury in college football players.

Authors:  Kelly J Jantzen; Brian Anderson; Fred L Steinberg; J A Scott Kelso
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  The effect of tapping finger and mode differences on cortical and subcortical activities: a PET study.

Authors:  Tomoko Aoki; Hayato Tsuda; Masashi Takasawa; Yasuhiro Osaki; Naohiko Oku; Jun Hatazawa; Hiroshi Kinoshita
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-09-11       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  See what I hear? Beat perception in auditory and visual rhythms.

Authors:  Jessica A Grahn
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Timing continuous or discontinuous movements across effectors specified by different pacing modalities and intervals.

Authors:  H Lorås; H Sigmundsson; J B Talcott; F Öhberg; A K Stensdotter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Neuroanatomical and neurochemical substrates of timing.

Authors:  Jennifer T Coull; Ruey-Kuang Cheng; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  Sensory-guided motor tasks benefit from mental training based on serial prediction.

Authors:  Ellen Binder; Klara Hagelweide; Ling E Wang; Katja Kornysheva; Christian Grefkes; Gereon R Fink; Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: a random-effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty.

Authors:  Simon B Eickhoff; Angela R Laird; Christian Grefkes; Ling E Wang; Karl Zilles; Peter T Fox
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  The ability to move to a beat is linked to the consistency of neural responses to sound.

Authors:  Adam Tierney; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.