Literature DB >> 23103188

Phenotypic engineering unveils the function of genital morphology.

Cosima Hotzy1, Michal Polak, Johanna L Rönn, Göran Arnqvist.   

Abstract

The rapidly evolving and often extraordinarily complex appearance of male genital morphology of internally fertilizing animals has been recognized for centuries. Postcopulatory sexual selection is regarded as the likely evolutionary engine of this diversity, but direct support for this hypothesis is limited. We used two complementary approaches, evolution through artificial selection and microscale laser surgery, to experimentally manipulate genital morphology in an insect model system. We then assessed the competitive fertilization success of these phenotypically manipulated males and studied the fate of their ejaculate in females using high-resolution radioisotopic labeling of ejaculates. Males with longer genital spines were more successful in gaining fertilizations, providing experimental evidence that male genital morphology influences success in postcopulatory reproductive competition. Furthermore, a larger proportion of the ejaculate moved from the reproductive tract into the female body following mating with males with longer spines, suggesting that genital spines increase the rate at which seminal fluid passes into the female hemolymph. Our results show that genital morphology affects male competitive fertilization success and imply that sexual selection on genital morphology may be mediated in part through seminal fluid.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23103188     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  33 in total

1.  Sexual conflict and the function of genitalic claws in guppies (Poecilia reticulata).

Authors:  Lucia Kwan; Yun Yun Cheng; F Helen Rodd; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  X-ray micro-CT scanning reveals temporal separation of male harm and female kicking during traumatic mating in seed beetles.

Authors:  Liam R Dougherty; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Copulatory wounding and traumatic insemination.

Authors:  Klaus Reinhardt; Nils Anthes; Rolanda Lange
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  Experimental reduction of intromittent organ length reduces male reproductive success in a bug.

Authors:  Liam R Dougherty; Imran A Rahman; Emily R Burdfield-Steel; E V Ginny Greenway; David M Shuker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  The evolution of sexually antagonistic phenotypes.

Authors:  Jennifer C Perry; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 6.  Mechanisms and Evidence of Genital Coevolution: The Roles of Natural Selection, Mate Choice, and Sexual Conflict.

Authors:  Patricia L R Brennan; Richard O Prum
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 10.005

7.  The genomic footprint of sexual conflict.

Authors:  Ahmed Sayadi; Alvaro Martinez Barrio; Elina Immonen; Jacques Dainat; David Berger; Christian Tellgren-Roth; Björn Nystedt; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 15.460

8.  Fine-scale genital morphology affects male ejaculation success: an experimental test.

Authors:  Meng-Han Joseph Chung; Rebecca J Fox; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Quantitative genetic insights into the coevolutionary dynamics of male and female genitalia.

Authors:  Jonathan P Evans; Emile van Lieshout; Clelia Gasparini
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Sexual conflict and correlated evolution between male persistence and female resistance traits in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus.

Authors:  Liam R Dougherty; Emile van Lieshout; Kathryn B McNamara; Joe A Moschilla; Göran Arnqvist; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.