Literature DB >> 25877218

Copulatory wounding and traumatic insemination.

Klaus Reinhardt1, Nils Anthes1, Rolanda Lange2.   

Abstract

Copulatory wounding (CW) is widespread in the animal kingdom, but likely underreported because of its cryptic nature. We use four case studies (Drosophila flies, Siphopteron slugs, Cimex bugs, and Callosobruchus beetles) to show that CW entails physiological and life-history costs, but can evolve into a routine mating strategy that, in some species, involves insemination through the wound. Although interspecific variation in CW is documented, few data exist on intraspecific and none on individual differences. Although defensive mechanisms evolve in the wound recipient, our review also indicates that mating costs in species with CW are slightly higher than in other species. Whether such costs are dose- or frequency-dependent, and whether defense occurs as resistance or tolerance, decisively affects the evolutionary outcome. In addition to sexual conflict, CW may also become a model system for reproductive isolation. In this context, we put forward a number of predictions, including (1) occasional CW is more costly than routine CW, (2) CW is more costly in between- than within-population matings, and (3) in the presence of CW, selection may favor the transmission of sexually transmitted diseases if they induce resource allocation. Finally, we outline, and briefly discuss, several medical implications of CW in humans.
Copyright © 2015 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25877218      PMCID: PMC4448625          DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a017582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol        ISSN: 1943-0264            Impact factor:   10.005


  86 in total

1.  Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Indirect sperm transfer in arthropods: behavioral and evolutionary trends.

Authors:  H C Proctor
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 19.686

3.  Sexual selection and genital evolution.

Authors:  David J Hosken; Paula Stockley
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Evolution of male and female genitalia following release from sexual selection.

Authors:  Luis Cayetano; Alexei A Maklakov; Robert C Brooks; Russell Bonduriansky
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Macroscopically detected female genital injury after consensual and non-consensual vaginal penetration: a prospective comparison study.

Authors:  Catherine Lincoln; Rafael Perera; Ian Jacobs; Alison Ward
Journal:  J Forensic Leg Med       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 1.614

Review 6.  Sexual conflict in hermaphrodites.

Authors:  Lukas Schärer; Tim Janicke; Steven A Ramm
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 7.  Sexually antagonistic coevolution in insects is associated with only limited morphological diversity.

Authors:  W Eberhard
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.411

8.  Traumatic insemination and sexual conflict in the bed bug Cimex lectularius.

Authors:  A D Stutt; M T Siva-Jothy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Anogenital injuries in adolescents after consensual sexual intercourse.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Jones; Linda Rossman; Melissa Hartman; Carmen C Alexander
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.451

10.  Multiple Quantitative Trait Loci Influence the Shape of a Male-Specific Genital Structure in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Casey L McNeil; Clint L Bain; Stuart J Macdonald
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.154

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Sexual conflict in hermaphrodites.

Authors:  Lukas Schärer; Tim Janicke; Steven A Ramm
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  Hypodermic self-insemination as a reproductive assurance strategy.

Authors:  Steven A Ramm; Aline Schlatter; Maude Poirier; Lukas Schärer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  The Biology of Aging in Insects: From Drosophila to Other Insects and Back.

Authors:  Daniel E L Promislow; Thomas Flatt; Russell Bonduriansky
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 19.686

4.  Male coercion and female injury in a sexually cannibalistic mantis.

Authors:  Nathan W Burke; Gregory I Holwell
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Traumatic mating increases anchorage of mating male and reduces female remating duration and fecundity in a scorpionfly species.

Authors:  Xin Tong; Peng-Yang Wang; Mei-Zhuo Jia; Randy Thornhill; Bao-Zhen Hua
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.530

6.  Ex vivo characterization of the circulating hemocytes of bed bugs and their responses to bacterial exposure.

Authors:  Rashaun Potts; Jonas G King; Jose E Pietri
Journal:  J Invertebr Pathol       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.795

7.  Regular Wounding in a Natural System: Bacteria Associated With Reproductive Organs of Bedbugs and Their Quorum Sensing Abilities.

Authors:  Oliver Otti; Peter Deines; Katrin Hammerschmidt; Klaus Reinhardt
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  Traumatic mating by hand saw-like spines on the internal sac in Pyrrhalta maculicollis (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Galerucinae).

Authors:  Yoko Matsumura; Haruki Suenaga; Yoshitaka Kamimura; Stanislav N Gorb
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 1.546

9.  Traumatic insemination and female counter-adaptation in Strepsiptera (Insecta).

Authors:  Miriam Peinert; Benjamin Wipfler; Gottfried Jetschke; Thomas Kleinteich; Stanislav N Gorb; Rolf G Beutel; Hans Pohl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The brain transcriptome of the wolf spider, Schizocosa ocreata.

Authors:  Daniel Stribling; Peter L Chang; Justin E Dalton; Christopher A Conow; Malcolm Rosenthal; Eileen Hebets; Rita M Graze; Michelle N Arbeitman
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2021-06-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.