Literature DB >> 23099552

Word production and the picture-word interference paradigm: the role of learning.

Simona Collina1, Patrizia Tabossi, Flavia De Simone.   

Abstract

Psycholinguistic experiments conducted with the picture-word interference paradigm are typically preceded by a phase during which participants learn the words they will have to produce in the experiment. In Experiment 1, the pictures (e.g., a frog) were to be named and were presented with a categorically related (e.g., cat) or unrelated distracter (e.g., pen). In the related condition responses were slower relative to the unrelated condition for the participants who had gone through the learning phase. In contrast, participants who had not been previously familiarized with the materials showed facilitation. In Experiment 2 one group of participants, as usual, learned to produce the targets upon presentation of the corresponding pictures (e.g., a frog). The other group learned to produce the same targets upon presentation of unrelated pictures (e.g., a clock). They showed very similar semantic effects. The implications of the findings in the study of word production are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23099552     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-012-9229-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  16 in total

1.  Set size and repetition in the picture--word interference paradigm: implications for models of naming.

Authors:  A Caramazza; A Costa
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2001-07

Review 2.  A theory of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  W J Levelt; A Roelofs; A S Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: modeling attentional control in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Ardi Roelofs
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 4.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review.

Authors:  C M MacLeod
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 5.  A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking.

Authors:  A Roelofs
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1992-03

6.  Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming.

Authors:  W La Heij
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-09

7.  Graphemic and semantic similarity effects in the picture-word interference task.

Authors:  K Rayner; C J Springer
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1986-05

8.  The time course of picture-word interference.

Authors:  W R Glaser; F J Düngelhoff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon.

Authors:  M O Glaser; W R Glaser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03
View more
  5 in total

1.  The Picture-Word Interference Paradigm: Grammatical Class Effects in Lexical Production.

Authors:  Flavia De Simone; Simona Collina
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-10

2.  Real-time processing in picture naming in adults who stutter: ERP evidence.

Authors:  Nathan D Maxfield; Kalie Morris; Stefan A Frisch; Kathryn Morphew; Joseph L Constantine
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Cognitive control of action naming in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Nathan D Maxfield
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 2.538

4.  The roles of shared vs. distinctive conceptual features in lexical access.

Authors:  Harrison E Vieth; Katie L McMahon; Greig I de Zubicaray
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-16

5.  When Wine and Apple Both Help the Production of Grapes: ERP Evidence for Post-lexical Semantic Facilitation in Picture Naming.

Authors:  Grégoire Python; Raphaël Fargier; Marina Laganaro
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.