Literature DB >> 23099548

The distribution of quick phase interval durations in human optokinetic nystagmus.

Jonathan Waddington1, Christopher M Harris.   

Abstract

There is an interesting dichotomy between models that predict the quick phase interval durations (QPIDs) of human optokinetic nystagmus (OKN). Accumulator models describe a stochastic signal in a neural network that triggers a response once the signal reaches a fixed threshold value. However, it is also possible that quick phases are triggered after eye position reaches a variable amplitude threshold. In this study, we fitted a range of probability density functions previously predicted by stochastic models of OKN (including those of the reciprocal truncated Normal, inverse Gaussian, gamma, lognormal and the mixture of two reciprocal truncated Normal distributions) to individual QPID histograms. We compared the goodness of fit between these models, and a model where the distribution of QPIDs is determined by the ratio of two correlated and truncated Normal random variables. The ratio distribution gave the best fit to the data, and we propose this is due to the approximately linear trajectory of slow phases (SPs) and that QPIDs are given by the ratio of a variable SP amplitude threshold and variable SP velocity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23099548     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3297-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  12 in total

1.  Visual selection: Neurons that make up their minds.

Authors:  R H Carpenter
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1999-08-26       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  On the distribution of fast-phase intervals in optokinetic and vestibular nystagmus.

Authors:  P Trillenberg; D S Zee; M Shelhamer
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 3.  Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions.

Authors:  Philip L Smith; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 13.837

4.  On the convergence of time interval moments: caveat sciscitator.

Authors:  Christopher M Harris; Jonathan Waddington
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Extended LATER model can account for trial-by-trial variability of both pre- and post-processes.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Nakahara; Kae Nakamura; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2006-09-12

6.  Neural computation of log likelihood in control of saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  R H Carpenter; M L Williams
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-09-07       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Distribution of quick-phase intervals in optokinetic nystagmus.

Authors:  R H Carpenter
Journal:  Ophthalmic Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.892

8.  A "beat-to-beat" interval generator for optokinetic nystagmus.

Authors:  C D Balaban; M Ariel
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  Optokinetic nystagmus elicited by a random dot pattern and a wide interval stripe pattern in normal subjects.

Authors:  Y Watanabe; A Ohmura; H Shojaku; K Mizukoshi
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1994

10.  Precision and accuracy of ocular following: influence of age and type of eye movement.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Tom H Margrain; Tom C A Freeman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  2 in total

1.  Manual choice reaction times in the rate-domain.

Authors:  Christopher M Harris; Jonathan Waddington; Valerio Biscione; Sean Manzi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Negative optokinetic afternystagmus in larval zebrafish demonstrates set-point adaptation.

Authors:  Ting-Feng Lin; Mohammad Mohammadi; Ahmed M Fathalla; Duygu Pul; Dennis Lüthi; Fausto Romano; Dominik Straumann; Kathleen E Cullen; Maurice J Chacron; Melody Ying-Yu Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.