Literature DB >> 16971090

Extended LATER model can account for trial-by-trial variability of both pre- and post-processes.

Hiroyuki Nakahara1, Kae Nakamura, Okihide Hikosaka.   

Abstract

We present a new decision-making model that can account for trial-by-trial variability induced by a process ("pre-process") that occurs before an explicit sensory signal specifying a later motor response. A process after explicit sensory signals, referred to herein as the "post-process", has been investigated by a variety of so-called rise-to-threshold models including the LATER model. The LATER model formulates post-process variability but treats the pre-process as fixed within a block of an experiment. We propose an extension of the LATER model, which we call the extended LATER (ELATER) model, to account for trial-by-trial variability of both pre- and post-processes together. We present the mathematical formulation of the ELATER model and analyze its characteristics, including numerical examples and an example of saccade latency data in reward-manipulated conditions with caudate activity. The ELATER model is useful for investigating decision making by taking account of trial-by-trial variability of both pre- and post-processes.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16971090     DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2006.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Netw        ISSN: 0893-6080


  16 in total

1.  The observant mind: self-awareness of attentional status.

Authors:  Noriko Yamagishi; Stephen J Anderson; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Lesions to the left lateral prefrontal cortex impair decision threshold adjustment for lexical selection.

Authors:  Royce Anders; Stéphanie Riès; Leendert Van Maanen; F-Xavier Alario
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Decision making in recurrent neuronal circuits.

Authors:  Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Neural basis of adaptive response time adjustment during saccade countermanding.

Authors:  Pierre Pouget; Gordon D Logan; Thomas J Palmeri; Leanne Boucher; Martin Paré; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Coupled Decision Processes Update and Maintain Saccadic Priors in a Dynamic Environment.

Authors:  Timothy Doyeon Kim; Mohammad Kabir; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Using saccades to diagnose covert hepatic encephalopathy.

Authors:  Nicholas Cunniffe; Henry Munby; Shona Chan; Defne Saatci; Eric Edison; R H S Carpenter; Dunecan Massey
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.584

7.  From salience to saccades: multiple-alternative gated stochastic accumulator model of visual search.

Authors:  Braden A Purcell; Jeffrey D Schall; Gordon D Logan; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The distribution of quick phase interval durations in human optokinetic nystagmus.

Authors:  Jonathan Waddington; Christopher M Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The neural substrate of prior information in perceptual decision making: a model-based analysis.

Authors:  Birte U Forstmann; Scott Brown; Gilles Dutilh; Jane Neumann; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Integrated Bayesian models of learning and decision making for saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Kay H Brodersen; Will D Penny; Lee M Harrison; Jean Daunizeau; Christian C Ruff; Emrah Duzel; Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2008-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.