Literature DB >> 20382927

Testing pigeon memory in a change detection task.

Anthony A Wright1, Jeffrey S Katz, John Magnotti, L Caitlin Elmore, Stephanie Babb, Sarah Alwin.   

Abstract

Six pigeons were trained in a change detection task with four colors. They were shown two colored circles on a sample array, followed by a test array with the color of one circle changed. The pigeons learned to choose the changed color and transferred their performance to four unfamiliar colors, suggesting that they had learned a generalized concept of color change. They also transferred performance to test delays several times their 50-msec training delay without prior delay training. The accurate delay performance of several seconds suggests that their change detection was memory based, as opposed to a perceptual attentional capture process. These experiments are the first to show that an animal species (pigeons, in this case) can learn a change detection task identical to ones used to test human memory, thereby providing the possibility of directly comparing short-term memory processing across species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20382927     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.2.243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  18 in total

1.  Change detection.

Authors:  Ronald A Rensink
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects.

Authors:  G A Alvarez; P Cavanagh
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-02

3.  Some data on matching behavior in the pigeon.

Authors:  W W CUMMING; R BERRYMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Spectral sensitivity in the pigeon.

Authors:  D S BLOUGH
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1957-09

5.  Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: a critical analysis.

Authors:  D E Carter; T J Werner
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Object-position binding in visual memory for natural scenes and object arrays.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Phonological similarity effects on detecting change in simple arrays.

Authors:  Stephen Mondy; Veronika Coltheart
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-12

8.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions.

Authors:  S J Luck; E K Vogel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Control of responding by location of auditory stimuli: adjacency of sound and response.

Authors:  J M Harrison; S D Iversen; S R Pratt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Encoding strategy and not visual working memory capacity correlates with intelligence.

Authors:  Rhodri Cusack; Manja Lehmann; Michele Veldsman; Daniel J Mitchell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-08
View more
  12 in total

1.  CNTRICS imaging biomarkers selection: Working memory.

Authors:  Deanna M Barch; Holly Moore; Derek E Nee; Dara S Manoach; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Change detection by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and pigeons (Columba livia).

Authors:  L Caitlin Elmore; John F Magnotti; Jeffrey S Katz; Anthony A Wright
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 2.231

3.  No evidence for feature binding by pigeons in a change detection task.

Authors:  Olga F Lazareva; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Qualitative similarities in the visual short-term memory of pigeons and people.

Authors:  Brett Gibson; Edward Wasserman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

5.  Monkey visual short-term memory directly compared to humans.

Authors:  L Caitlin Elmore; Anthony A Wright
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 2.478

6.  Visual object complexity limits pigeon short-term memory.

Authors:  John F Magnotti; Adam M Goodman; Thomas A Daniel; L Caitlin Elmore; Anthony A Wright; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Change detection for the study of object and location memory.

Authors:  L Caitlin Elmore; Antony D Passaro; Anthony A Wright
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Active change detection by pigeons and humans.

Authors:  Carl Erick Hagmann; Robert G Cook
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2013-07-22

9.  A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons (Columba Livia).

Authors:  Walter T Herbranson
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Rats (Rattus norvegicus) flexibly retrieve objects' non-spatial and spatial information from their visuospatial working memory: effects of integrated and separate processing of these features in a missing-object recognition task.

Authors:  Corrine Keshen; Jerome Cohen
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.