Literature DB >> 23098379

Experimental quantification of electrostatics in X-H···π hydrogen bonds.

Miguel Saggu1, Nicholas M Levinson, Steven G Boxer.   

Abstract

Hydrogen bonds are ubiquitous in chemistry and biology. The physical forces that govern n class="Chemical">hydrogen-bonding interactions have been heavily debated, with much of the discussion focused on the relative contributions of electrostatic vs quantum mechanical effects. In principle, the vibrational Stark effect, the response of a vibrational mode to electric field, can provide an experimental method for parsing such interactions into their electrostatic and nonelectrostatic components. In a previous study we showed that, in the case of relatively weak O-H···π hydrogen bonds, the O-H bond displays a linear response to an electric field, and we exploited this response to demonstrate that the interactions are dominated by electrostatics (Saggu, M.; Levinson, N. M.; Boxer, S. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc.2011, 133, 17414-17419). Here we extend this work to other X-H···π interactions. We find that the response of the X-H vibrational probe to electric field appears to become increasingly nonlinear in the order O-H < N-H < S-H. The observed effects are consistent with differences in atomic polarizabilities of the X-H groups. Nonetheless, we find that the X-H stretching vibrations of the model compounds indole and thiophenol report quantitatively on the electric fields they experience when complexed with aromatic hydrogen-bond acceptors. These measurements can be used to estimate the electrostatic binding energies of the interactions, which are found to agree closely with the results of energy calculations. Taken together, these results highlight that with careful calibration vibrational probes can provide direct measurements of the electrostatic components of hydrogen bonds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23098379      PMCID: PMC3511793          DOI: 10.1021/ja305575t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  19 in total

1.  C-H...pi-interactions in proteins.

Authors:  M Brandl; M S Weiss; A Jabs; J Sühnel; R Hilgenfeld
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-03-16       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Accurately characterizing the pi-pi interaction energies of indole-benzene complexes.

Authors:  Yue Geng; Tait Takatani; Edward G Hohenstein; C David Sherrill
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.781

3.  Nature and physical origin of CH/pi interaction: significant difference from conventional hydrogen bonds.

Authors:  Seiji Tsuzuki; Asuka Fujii
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 3.676

4.  pH-dependent Raman study of pyrrole and its vibrational analysis using DFT calculations.

Authors:  Dheeraj K Singh; Sunil K Srivastava; Animesh K Ojha; B P Asthana
Journal:  Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 4.098

5.  Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev B Condens Matter       Date:  1988-01-15

Review 6.  Stark spectroscopy: applications in chemistry, biology, and materials science.

Authors:  G U Bublitz; S G Boxer
Journal:  Annu Rev Phys Chem       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 12.703

7.  Hydrogen bonds with pi-acceptors in proteins: frequencies and role in stabilizing local 3D structures.

Authors:  T Steiner; G Koellner
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 8.  Aromatic-aromatic interaction: a mechanism of protein structure stabilization.

Authors:  S K Burley; G A Petsko
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-07-05       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Hydrogen bond lifetimes and energetics for solute/solvent complexes studied with 2D-IR vibrational echo spectroscopy.

Authors:  Junrong Zheng; Michael D Fayer
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Large protein-induced dipoles for a symmetric carotenoid in a photosynthetic antenna complex.

Authors:  D S Gottfried; M A Steffen; S G Boxer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-02-08       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  10 in total

1.  Sequential unfolding of the hemolysin two-partner secretion domain from Proteus mirabilis.

Authors:  Megan R Wimmer; Christopher N Woods; Kyle J Adamczak; Evan M Glasgow; Walter R P Novak; Daniel P Grilley; Todd M Weaver
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Insights into Thiol-Aromatic Interactions: A Stereoelectronic Basis for S-H/π Interactions.

Authors:  Christina R Forbes; Sudipta K Sinha; Himal K Ganguly; Shi Bai; Glenn P A Yap; Sandeep Patel; Neal J Zondlo
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Thermodynamic entropy of organic oxidation in the water environment: experimental evaluation compared to semi-empirical calculation.

Authors:  Li Luo; Xiaochang C Wang; Huu Hao Ngo; Wenshan Guo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Measuring electric fields and noncovalent interactions using the vibrational stark effect.

Authors:  Stephen D Fried; Steven G Boxer
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 22.384

5.  Photosynthetic reaction center variants made via genetic code expansion show Tyr at M210 tunes the initial electron transfer mechanism.

Authors:  Jared Bryce Weaver; Chi-Yun Lin; Kaitlyn M Faries; Irimpan I Mathews; Silvia Russi; Dewey Holten; Christine Kirmaier; Steven G Boxer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  The electronic mechanism ruling the dihydrogen bonds and halogen bonds in weakly bound systems of H3SiH···HOX and H 3SiH···XOH (X = F, Cl, and Br).

Authors:  Boaz G Oliveira; Abedin Zabardasti; Hamid Goudarziafshar; Maryam Salehnassaj
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  Vibrational Stark Effects of Carbonyl Probes Applied to Reinterpret IR and Raman Data for Enzyme Inhibitors in Terms of Electric Fields at the Active Site.

Authors:  Samuel H Schneider; Steven G Boxer
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Unexpected solvent effects on the UV/Vis absorption spectra of o-cresol in toluene and benzene: in contrast with non-aromatic solvents.

Authors:  Dong Zheng; Xiang-Ai Yuan; Haibo Ma; Xiaoxiong Li; Xizhang Wang; Ziteng Liu; Jing Ma
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  The Impact of Electron Correlation on Describing QM/MM Interactions in the Attendant Molecular Dynamics Simulations of CO in Myoglobin.

Authors:  Xianwei Wang; Chenhui Lu; Maoyou Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Tunable control of polyproline helix (PPII) structure via aromatic electronic effects: an electronic switch of polyproline helix.

Authors:  Anil K Pandey; Krista M Thomas; Christina R Forbes; Neal J Zondlo
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.162

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.