Literature DB >> 2309812

Infections complicating low-risk cesarean sections in community hospitals: efficacy of antimicrobial prophylaxis.

N J Ehrenkranz1, W C Blackwelder, S J Pfaff, D Poppe, D E Yerg, R A Kaslow.   

Abstract

A prospective study of women with low-risk cesarean sections was conducted in four community hospitals to determine the frequency of postoperative infections and identify factors predisposing to endometritis and wound infection. Low-risk cesarean section was defined as a scheduled procedure without an urgent indication, with any duration of ruptured membranes being less than or equal to 12 hours. In a cohort of 1863 patients, 26 (1.4%) developed endometritis and 21 (1.1%) had wound infections. Primary cesarean section was associated with endometritis in the cohort (p less than 0.01) and in a retrospective study with the same cases as in the cohort (p = 0.01). Absence of antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with endometritis (p less than or equal to 0.013) or endometritis with wound infection (p less than 0.01) in both studies. Without prophylaxis 37 such infections occurred in 957 (3.7%) women; with prophylaxis eight infections occurred in 906 (0.9%) women. Routine timely antibiotic prophylaxis in low-risk cesarean sections could lead to an annual national savings of approximately $9 million.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2309812     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90381-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  11 in total

1.  [Etiology and consequences of postoperative wound infection].

Authors:  M Rogy; R Függer; E Riedl; F Schulz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1991

2.  Prescribing practice and cost of antibacterial prophylaxis for surgery at a US Veteran Affairs hospital.

Authors:  R A Ryono; K S Jones; R W Coleman; M Holodniy
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Current debate on the use of antibiotic prophylaxis for caesarean section.

Authors:  R F Lamont; J D Sobel; J P Kusanovic; E Vaisbuch; S Mazaki-Tovi; S K Kim; N Uldbjerg; R Romero
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 4.  Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section.

Authors:  Fiona M Smaill; Rosalie M Grivell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-10-28

5.  Acute care visits and rehospitalization in women and infants after cesarean birth.

Authors:  D Donahue; D Brooten; M Roncoli; L Arnold; H Knapp; L Borucki; A Cohen
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 6.  Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section.

Authors:  Fiona M Smaill; Gillian Ml Gyte
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

7.  A randomized trial of early hospital discharge and home follow-up of women having cesarean birth.

Authors:  D Brooten; M Roncoli; S Finkler; L Arnold; A Cohen; M Mennuti
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Efficacy of single dose of gentamicin in combination with metronidazole versus multiple doses for prevention of post-caesarean infection: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Fadhili M Lyimo; Anthony N Massinde; Benson R Kidenya; Evelyne Konje; Stephen E Mshana
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis for nonlaboring cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Mara J Dinsmoor; Sharon Gilbert; Mark B Landon; Dwight J Rouse; Catherine Y Spong; Michael W Varner; Steve N Caritis; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Single dose of gentamicin in combination with metronidazole versus multiple doses for prevention of post-caesarean infection at Bugando Medical Centre in Mwanza, Tanzania: a randomized, equivalence, controlled trial.

Authors:  Fadhili M Lyimo; Anthony N Massinde; Benson R Kidenya; Eveline T Konje; Stephen E Mshana
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.