Prescribing practice and cost of antibacterial prophylaxis for surgery at a US Veteran Affairs hospital.

This study retrospectively compared the actual drug-related cost of antibacterial prophylaxis for specific operative procedures with the theoretical costs based on recommendations published in Medical Letter on Drugs and Therapeutics, the Surgical Infection Society, and those of the chiefs of each surgical subspecialty at our institution. We identified all patients who received in intravenous bacterial for prophylaxis before a clean or clean-contaminated operation between 1st January and 30th September 1993, using the medical centre's computerised information system. The information included comprehensive surgical case histories, and pharmacy and microbiology records. Only those operations in which recommendations for surgical prophylaxis were present in all 3 guidelines were included. The outcome measures were antibacterial-related costs (drug acquisition and administration costs), the number of antibacterial doses dispensed, and choice of antibacterial agents. During the study period, 3,322 operations were performed, 2,993 of which were excluded. Thus, 329 patients undergoing operations in 6 subspecialties were included in the analysis. The actual mean cost per patient significantly exceeded the projected costs using Medical Letter Consultants' and Surgical Infection Society guidelines for all 6 subspecialties [mean excess cost per patient: $US49.04 and $US34.95, respectively (1994 values)] and institutional guidelines for 4 of the 6 subspecialties (mean excess cost per patient: $US24.36). The actual mean number of doses per patient significantly exceeded those projected using Medical Letter Consultants' and Surgical Infection Society guidelines for all 6 subspecialties (mean excess number of doses per patient: 6.0 and 4.0, respectively) and institutional guidelines for 4 of the 6 subspecialties (mean excess number of doses per patient: 2.9). The choice of antibacterial was appropriate in approximately 90% of cases. We conclude that the practice of antibacterial prophylaxis for specific operative procedures performed by 6 subspecialties is not in accordance with institutional or published guidelines, and the excess cost is primarily a result of prolonged duration of antibacterial prophylaxis.