Literature DB >> 23097251

Predicting three-dimensional patellofemoral kinematics from static imaging-based alignment measures.

Benjamin R Freedman1, Frances T Sheehan.   

Abstract

Patellofemoral pain syndrome causes significant discomfort and disability among much of the general population. Despite recent breakthroughs in dynamic three-dimensional imaging technologies to assess pathological patellofemoral motion, such tools remain costly for clinical diagnostics applications. Thus, this study investigated whether three-dimensional patellofemoral kinematics could be predicted from routine two-dimensional static measures of patellofemoral joint alignment quantified from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data acquired in full knee extension. Twenty-six volunteers clinically diagnosed with patellofemoral pain (19 F/7 M, 25.9 ± 11.1 years) and 26 control subjects (19 F/7 M, 25.3 ± 7.7 years) were included in this IRB-approved study. Static three-dimensional sagittal T1-weighted gradient recall echo and dynamic MRI scans were acquired. For the dynamic image acquisition, subjects cyclically flexed and extended their knee (at 30 cycles/min) while a full cine-phase contrast MRI set (24 time frames of anatomic images and x-, y-, and z-velocity images) was acquired. From these data, static measures of patellofemoral alignment and three-dimensional patellofemoral kinematics were derived. Single and multiple regressions between static and kinematic variables were evaluated. Although shown reliable, the static MRI measures could only partially predict patellofemoral kinematics, with r(2) -values ranging from 16% to 77%. This makes it imperitave that the current precise, accurate, 3D, dynamic imaging techniques be translated into clinical tools.
Copyright © 2012 Orthopaedic Research Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23097251      PMCID: PMC4447147          DOI: 10.1002/jor.22246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  42 in total

Review 1.  Current concepts on anatomy and biomechanics of patellar stability.

Authors:  Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rev       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  The effects of quadriceps contraction on different patellofemoral alignment subtypes: an axial computed tomography study.

Authors:  Mei-Hwa Jan; Da-Hon Lin; Chien-Ho Janice Lin; Yeong-Fwu Lin; Cheng-Kung Cheng
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.751

3.  Using cine phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging to non-invasively study in vivo knee dynamics.

Authors:  F T Sheehan; F E Zajac; J E Drace
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Patellofemoral joint kinematics in individuals with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Authors:  N J MacIntyre; N A Hill; R A Fellows; R E Ellis; D R Wilson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Limb positioning is critical for defining patellofemoral alignment and femoral shape.

Authors:  Nao Shibanuma; Frances T Sheehan; Steven J Stanhope
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The patellotrochlear index: a new index for assessing patellar height.

Authors:  Roland M Biedert; Silvia Albrecht
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Is there a relationship between anterior knee pain and femoral trochlear dysplasia? Assessment of lateral trochlear inclination by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Selçuk Keser; Ahmet Savranlar; Ahmet Bayar; Ahmet Ege; Egemen Turhan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Patella malalignment, pain and patellofemoral progression: the Health ABC Study.

Authors:  D J Hunter; Y Q Zhang; J B Niu; D T Felson; K Kwoh; A Newman; S Kritchevsky; T Harris; L Carbone; M Nevitt
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  In vivo noninvasive evaluation of abnormal patellar tracking during squatting in patients with patellofemoral pain.

Authors:  Nicole A Wilson; Joel M Press; Jason L Koh; Ronald W Hendrix; Li-Qun Zhang
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Understanding patellofemoral pain with maltracking in the presence of joint laxity: complete 3D in vivo patellofemoral and tibiofemoral kinematics.

Authors:  Frances T Sheehan; Aditya Derasari; Timothy J Brindle; Katharine E Alter
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  18 in total

1.  Static patella tilt and axial engagement in knee extension are mainly influenced by knee torsion, the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance (TTTG), and trochlear dysplasia but not by femoral or tibial torsion.

Authors:  P Kaiser; F Loth; R Attal; M Kummann; P Schuster; F Riechelmann; M Schlumberger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Statistical modeling to characterize relationships between knee anatomy and kinematics.

Authors:  Lowell M Smoger; Clare K Fitzpatrick; Chadd W Clary; Adam J Cyr; Lorin P Maletsky; Paul J Rullkoetter; Peter J Laz
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  In vivo patellofemoral contact mechanics during active extension using a novel dynamic MRI-based methodology.

Authors:  B S Borotikar; F T Sheehan
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Normalized patellofemoral joint reaction force is greater in individuals with patellofemoral pain.

Authors:  Lucas T Thomeer; Frances T Sheehan; Jennifer N Jackson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Increased Patellar Volume/Width and Decreased Femoral Trochlear Width Are Associated With Adolescent Patellofemoral Pain.

Authors:  Richard M Smith; Barry P Boden; Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Re-evaluating the functional implications of the Q-angle and its relationship to in-vivo patellofemoral kinematics.

Authors:  Benjamin R Freedman; Timothy J Brindle; Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  Statistical shape modeling predicts patellar bone geometry to enable stereo-radiographic kinematic tracking.

Authors:  Lowell M Smoger; Kevin B Shelburne; Adam J Cyr; Paul J Rullkoetter; Peter J Laz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Inter- and intra-rater reliability of patellofemoral kinematic and contact area quantification by fast spin echo MRI and correlation with cartilage health by quantitative T1ρ MRI.

Authors:  Brian C Lau; Daniel U Thuillier; Valentina Pedoia; Ellison Y Chen; Zhihong Zhang; Brian T Feeley; Richard B Souza
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  MRI-based analysis of patellofemoral cartilage contact, thickness, and alignment in extension, and during moderate and deep flexion.

Authors:  Benjamin R Freedman; Frances T Sheehan; Amy L Lerner
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Patellofemoral Pain in Adolescents: Understanding Patellofemoral Morphology and Its Relationship to Maltracking.

Authors:  Cameron N Fick; Camila Grant; Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.