Literature DB >> 23097247

Attention modulates the dorsal striatum response to love stimuli.

Sandra J E Langeslag1, Frederik M van der Veen, Christian H Röder.   

Abstract

In previous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies concerning romantic love, several brain regions including the caudate and putamen have consistently been found to be more responsive to beloved-related than control stimuli. In those studies, infatuated individuals were typically instructed to passively view the stimuli or to think of the viewed person. In the current study, we examined how the instruction to attend to, or ignore the beloved modulates the response of these brain areas. Infatuated individuals performed an oddball task in which pictures of their beloved and friend served as targets and distractors. The dorsal striatum showed greater activation for the beloved than friend, but only when they were targets. The dorsal striatum actually tended to show less activation for the beloved than the friend when they were distractors. The longer the love and relationship duration, the smaller the response of the dorsal striatum to beloved-distractor stimuli was. We interpret our findings in terms of reinforcement learning. By virtue of using a cognitive task with a full factorial design, we show that the dorsal striatum is not activated by beloved-related information per se, but only by beloved-related information that is attended.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  emotion; functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI); love; motivation; reward

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23097247      PMCID: PMC6869091          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  44 in total

1.  Real-time 3D image registration for functional MRI.

Authors:  R W Cox; A Jesmanowicz
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Neuronal representations of cognitive state: reward or attention?

Authors:  John H R Maunsell
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Amygdala activation to sad pictures during high-field (4 tesla) functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Lihong Wang; Gregory McCarthy; Allen W Song; Kevin S Labar
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2005-03

4.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages.

Authors:  R W Cox
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1996-06

5.  Neural correlates of long-term intense romantic love.

Authors:  Bianca P Acevedo; Arthur Aron; Helen E Fisher; Lucy L Brown
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 6.  Multiplicity of control in the basal ganglia: computational roles of striatal subregions.

Authors:  Aaron M Bornstein; Nathaniel D Daw
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Effect of bupropion extended release on negative emotion processing in major depressive disorder: a pilot functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Brigitte Robertson; Lihong Wang; Michele T Diaz; Marilyn Aiello; Kenneth Gersing; John Beyer; Srinivasan Mukundan; Gregory McCarthy; P Murali Doraiswamy
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.384

8.  Viewing pictures of a romantic partner reduces experimental pain: involvement of neural reward systems.

Authors:  Jarred Younger; Arthur Aron; Sara Parke; Neil Chatterjee; Sean Mackey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Neurophysiological evidence for abnormal cognitive processing of drug cues in heroin dependence.

Authors:  Ingmar H A Franken; Cornelis J Stam; Vincent M Hendriks; Wim van den Brink
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Sex differences in neural activation to facial expressions denoting contempt and disgust.

Authors:  André Aleman; Marte Swart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Electrophysiological Correlates of Romantic Love: A Review of EEG and ERP Studies with Beloved-Related Stimuli.

Authors:  Sandra J E Langeslag
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-04-26

2.  Aversive emotional interference impacts behavior and prefronto-striatal activity during increasing attentional control.

Authors:  Apostolos Papazacharias; Paolo Taurisano; Leonardo Fazio; Barbara Gelao; Annabella Di Giorgio; Luciana Lo Bianco; Tiziana Quarto; Marina Mancini; Annamaria Porcelli; Raffaella Romano; Grazia Caforio; Orlando Todarello; Teresa Popolizio; Giuseppe Blasi; Alessandro Bertolino
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.558

3.  Being in a Romantic Relationship Is Associated with Reduced Gray Matter Density in Striatum and Increased Subjective Happiness.

Authors:  Hiroaki Kawamichi; Sho K Sugawara; Yuki H Hamano; Kai Makita; Masahiro Matsunaga; Hiroki C Tanabe; Yuichi Ogino; Shigeru Saito; Norihiro Sadato
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-14

4.  Tribal love: the neural correlates of passionate engagement in football fans.

Authors:  Isabel C Duarte; Sónia Afonso; Helena Jorge; Ricardo Cayolla; Carlos Ferreira; Miguel Castelo-Branco
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 5.  An attachment theoretical perspective for the neural representation of close others.

Authors:  Anne C Laurita; Cindy Hazan; R Nathan Spreng
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Regulation of Romantic Love Feelings: Preconceptions, Strategies, and Feasibility.

Authors:  Sandra J E Langeslag; Jan W van Strien
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Spiritual experiences are related to engagement of a ventral frontotemporal functional brain network: Implications for prevention and treatment of behavioral and substance addictions.

Authors:  Clayton H McClintock; Patrick D Worhunsky; Jiansong Xu; Iris M Balodis; Rajita Sinha; Lisa Miller; Marc N Potenza
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 6.756

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.