| Literature DB >> 31891313 |
Clayton H McClintock1, Patrick D Worhunsky2, Jiansong Xu2, Iris M Balodis2,3, Rajita Sinha2,4,5, Lisa Miller1, Marc N Potenza4,5,6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Spirituality is an important component of 12-step programs for behavioral and substance addictions and has been linked to recovery processes. Understanding the neural correlates of spiritual experiences may help to promote efforts to enhance recovery processes in behavioral addictions. We recently used general linear model (GLM) analyses of functional magnetic resonance imaging data to examine neural correlates of spiritual experiences, with findings implicating cortical and subcortical brain regions. Although informative, the GLM-based approach does not provide insight into brain circuits that may underlie spiritual experiences.Entities:
Keywords: frontotemporal; functional networks; independent component analysis; parietal; spirituality; ventral attention network
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31891313 PMCID: PMC7044576 DOI: 10.1556/2006.8.2019.71
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Behav Addict ISSN: 2062-5871 Impact factor: 6.756
Figure 1.(a) Schematic of timeline and epochs used in fMRI data analysis. The R1 and R2 periods constitute the 20-s periods immediately prior to and immediately following the listening period when the audio file was being played and participants actively engaged in guided imagery processes. The B1 and B2 periods are the first and second 20-s periods during the beginning of the audio file listening. The E1 and E2 periods are the next-to-last and last 20-s periods at the end of the audio file listening. (b) Subjective responses on vividness of story, spiritual connection, and anxiety across the three conditions. Participants were questioned prior to listening to their individualized script (“Baseline”) and following the script (“Post-imagery”). ***p < .001
Figure 2.Engagement of a frontotemporal network during the spiritual condition. The regions comprising the frontotemporal network are shown with red–yellow color signifying regional activation during engagement and blue color indicating regional deactivation during active engagement. Plots on the right indicate engagement of the functional network by epoch and condition (top: solid markers indicate significant positive and negative engagement at pFDR < .05) and average engagement by condition (bottom: **p < .01)
Regional composition of the frontotemporal network
| +/− | Region/gyrus | BA | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| + | L Middle/superior/inferior temporal, middle/inferior frontal, precentral, postcentral, angular, insula, and frontal operculum | 3, 6, 8–10, 13, 19–22, 37–40, 44–47 | 3,309 | −30 | 20 | −4 | 18.78 |
| + | R Caudate, pallidum, thalamus, putamen, and brainstem | 279 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 17.71 | |
| + | R Middle/superior/inferior temporal, middle/inferior frontal, precentral, postcentral, angular, insula, and frontal operculum | 3, 4, 6, 8–10, 13, 18–22, 37–40, 44–47 | 3,213 | 57 | −40 | −7 | 16.89 |
| + | R/L Superior frontal and supplementary motor | 6, 8, 9 | 774 | −3 | 14 | 56 | 15.73 |
| + | L Cerebellum | 177 | −12 | −73 | −28 | 15.25 | |
| + | L Caudate, pallidum, thalamus, putamen, and brainstem | 226 | −12 | 5 | 11 | 14.38 | |
| + | R Cerebellum | 194 | 15 | −79 | −40 | 12.46 | |
| + | R Middle occipital | 18, 19 | 112 | 30 | −100 | 8 | 11.40 |
| + | R Cuneus and precuneus | 31 | 140 | 15 | −61 | 20 | 9.77 |
| − | L/R Middle/posterior cingulate, and precentral | 24, 31 | 291 | 6 | −34 | 44 | 15.42 |
| − | L/R Middle cingulate and supplementary motor | 24, 32 | 146 | 3 | 2 | 44 | 14.08 |
| − | R Angular and supramarginal | 39, 40 | 136 | 48 | −55 | 47 | 12.81 |
Note. Cluster details of the frontotemporal network at voxel-level pFWE < .01, k > 100. +/−: positive/negative signal integration; BA: Brodmann area; k: cluster size in contiguous voxels; x, y, z: cluster peak location in MNI coordinates; t: cluster peak t-score; R/L: right/left.
Figure 3.Correlations between changes in ventral frontotemporal network engagement and spirituality measures. Correlations are shown for changes in engagement of the ventral frontotemporal network and (a) self-reported changes in spirituality during exposure to the spirituality condition and, (b) total scores on the Spirituality Scale