Literature DB >> 2309654

Validation of a new computerized technique for quantitating individual dietary intake: the Nutrition Evaluation Scale System (NESSy) vs the weighed food record.

M J Kretsch1, A K Fong.   

Abstract

A validation study was conducted in which food intake recorded by research volunteers using a new computerized technique, the Nutrition Evaluation Scale System (NESSy), was compared with food intake obtained from a weighed food record concurrently measured and recorded by metabolic unit dietary staff. Nine women between ages 23 and 35 y resided in the metabolic research unit and recorded their food intake with NESSy for 16 consecutive days. The mean of the differences between NESSy and the manual technique was not significant on a group basis (p less than 0.05) for food energy or any other nutrient. All mean differences were less than 5% and Pearson correlation coefficients ranged from 0.81 to 0.98 (p less than 0.0001), with all but iron, potassium, sodium, and preformed niacin having correlations greater than 0.92. For the majority of the individuals, accuracy within 10% of their actual dietary intake was found for energy and selected nutrients. NESSy is a new computerized approach to dietary intake assessment that yields accurate data on both a group and individual basis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2309654     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/51.3.477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  5 in total

1.  Performance of the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Recall relative to a measure of true intakes and to an interviewer-administered 24-h recall.

Authors:  Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Amy F Subar; Deirdre Douglass; Thea P Zimmerman; Frances E Thompson; Lisa L Kahle; Stephanie M George; Kevin W Dodd; Nancy Potischman
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  The Use of Digital Images in 24-Hour Recalls May Lead to Less Misestimation of Portion Size Compared with Traditional Interviewer-Administered Recalls.

Authors:  Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Nancy Potischman; Kevin W Dodd; Deirdre Douglass; Thea P Zimmerman; Lisa L Kahle; Frances E Thompson; Stephanie M George; Amy F Subar
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 3.  Diet, nutrition, and cancer: past, present and future.

Authors:  Susan T Mayne; Mary C Playdon; Cheryl L Rock
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Energy intake highs and lows: how much does consistency matter in weight control?

Authors:  Diane L Rosenbaum; Leah M Schumacher; Katherine Schaumberg; Amani D Piers; Monika E Gaspar; Michael R Lowe; Evan M Forman; Meghan L Butryn
Journal:  Clin Obes       Date:  2016-03-29

5.  Need for technological innovation in dietary assessment.

Authors:  Frances E Thompson; Amy F Subar; Catherine M Loria; Jill L Reedy; Tom Baranowski
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2010-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.