Literature DB >> 23090696

Systematic analysis and validation of differential gene expression in ovarian serous adenocarcinomas and normal ovary.

Dirk Bauerschlag1, Karen Bräutigam, Roland Moll, Jalid Sehouli, Alexander Mustea, Darius Salehin, Maryla Krajewska, John C Reed, Nicolai Maass, Garret M Hampton, Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cancer of the ovary confers the worst prognosis among women with gynecological malignancies, primarily because most ovarian cancers are diagnosed at late stage. Hence, there is a substantial need to develop new diagnostic biomarkers to enable detection of ovarian cancer at earlier stages, which would confer better prognosis. In addition, the identification of druggable targets is of substantial interest to find new therapeutic strategies for ovarian cancer.
METHODS: The expression of 22,500 genes in a series of 67 serous papillary carcinomas was compared with 9 crudely enriched normal ovarian tissue samples by RNA hybridization on oligonucleotide microarrays. Multiple genes with near-uniformly expression were elevated in carcinomas of varying grade and malignant potential, including several previously described genes (e.g., MUC-1, CD9, CD24, claudin 3, and mesothelin). We performed immunohistochemical staining with antibodies against several of the proteins encoded by differentially expressed genes in an independent cohort of 71 cases of paraffin-embedded ovarian cancer samples.
RESULTS: We found striking differences in EpCAM (p < 0.005), CD9 (p < 0.001), MUC-1 (p < 0.001), and claudin 3 proteins (p < 0.001) but not for mesothelin (p > 0.05) using the Mann-Whitney U test.
CONCLUSIONS: Protein expression of a majority of the differentially expressed genes tested was found to be elevated in ovarian carcinomas and, as such, define potential new biomarkers or targets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23090696     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-012-1334-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  50 in total

1.  An integrated clinical-genomics approach identifies a candidate multi-analyte blood test for serous ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein; Dirk Bauerschlag; Yingyao Zhou; Lisa M Sapinoso; Keith Ching; Henry Frierson; Karen Bräutigam; Jalid Sehouli; Elmar Stickeler; Dominique Könsgen; Felix Hilpert; Constantin S von Kaisenberg; Jacobus Pfisterer; Thomas Bauknecht; Walter Jonat; Norbert Arnold; Garret M Hampton
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Prognostic significance of apoptosis regulators in breast cancer.

Authors:  S Krajewski; M Krajewska; B C Turner; C Pratt; B Howard; J M Zapata; V Frenkel; S Robertson; Y Ionov; H Yamamoto; M Perucho; S Takayama; J C Reed
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.678

3.  Immunomonitoring results of a phase II/III study of malignant ascites patients treated with the trifunctional antibody catumaxomab (anti-EpCAM x anti-CD3).

Authors:  Michael Jäger; Alexandra Schoberth; Peter Ruf; Juergen Hess; Michael Hennig; Barbara Schmalfeldt; Pauline Wimberger; Michael Ströhlein; Bettina Theissen; Markus M Heiss; Horst Lindhofer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Soluble MUC1 and serum MUC1-specific antibodies are potential prognostic biomarkers for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Raluca A Budiu; Gina Mantia-Smaldone; Esther Elishaev; Tianjiao Chu; Julia Thaller; Kathryn McCabe; Diana Lenzner; Robert P Edwards; Anda M Vlad
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 6.968

5.  High Ep-CAM expression is associated with poor prognosis in node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Gilbert Spizzo; Philip Went; Stephan Dirnhofer; Peter Obrist; Ronald Simon; Hanspeter Spichtin; Robert Maurer; Urs Metzger; Brida von Castelberg; Rahel Bart; Shanna Stopatschinskaya; Ossi Robert Köchli; Philip Haas; Friedrich Mross; Markus Zuber; Holger Dietrich; Susanne Bischoff; Martina Mirlacher; Guido Sauter; Guenther Gastl
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Expression of MUC1 and MUC2 mucins in epithelial ovarian tumours.

Authors:  Y Dong; M D Walsh; M C Cummings; R G Wright; S K Khoo; P G Parsons; M A McGuckin
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 7.  Soluble markers for diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Alfonso Cristaudo; Alessandra Bonotti; Silvia Simonini; Rossella Bruno; Rudy Foddis
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.851

8.  EpCAM nuclear localization identifies aggressive thyroid cancer and is a marker for poor prognosis.

Authors:  Ranju Ralhan; Jun Cao; Terence Lim; Christina Macmillan; Jeremy L Freeman; Paul G Walfish
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Immunohistochemical analysis of Mcl-1 and Bcl-2 proteins in normal and neoplastic lymph nodes.

Authors:  S Krajewski; S Bodrug; R Gascoyne; K Berean; M Krajewska; J C Reed
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.307

10.  Utility of osteopontin as a biomarker in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  K A Brakora; H Lee; R Yusuf; L Sullivan; A Harris; T Colella; M V Seiden
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.482

View more
  2 in total

1.  Functional genomic mRNA profiling of a large cancer data base demonstrates mesothelin overexpression in a broad range of tumor types.

Authors:  Laetitia E Lamberts; Derk Jan A de Groot; Rico D Bense; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Rudolf S N Fehrmann
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-09-29

2.  Prevalence of DLL3, CTLA-4 and MSTN Expression in Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Orgilmaa Regzedmaa; Ying Li; Yongwen Li; Hongbing Zhang; Jin Wang; Hao Gong; Yin Yuan; Weiting Li; Hongyu Liu; Jun Chen
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.147

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.