Literature DB >> 15567937

High Ep-CAM expression is associated with poor prognosis in node-positive breast cancer.

Gilbert Spizzo1, Philip Went, Stephan Dirnhofer, Peter Obrist, Ronald Simon, Hanspeter Spichtin, Robert Maurer, Urs Metzger, Brida von Castelberg, Rahel Bart, Shanna Stopatschinskaya, Ossi Robert Köchli, Philip Haas, Friedrich Mross, Markus Zuber, Holger Dietrich, Susanne Bischoff, Martina Mirlacher, Guido Sauter, Guenther Gastl.   

Abstract

Previous studies in small series of patients with invasive breast cancer suggested a prognostic value of Ep-CAM overexpression in primary tumor tissue. To corroborate these findings, we performed a retrospective analysis of Ep-CAM expression using a tissue microarray containing tissue specimens from a large patient set. Ep-CAM expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in breast cancer tissue from 1715 patients with documented raw survival data. High level Ep-CAM expression (overexpression) was found in 41.7% of tumor samples, low level expression was found in 48.0% and no expression in 10.3% of tumor samples. Ep-CAM expression predicted poor overall survival in this patient cohort (p < 0.0001). Overall survival decreased significantly with increasing Ep-CAM expression. However, in this patient sample Ep-CAM expression was not an independent prognostic marker by multivariate analysis. Subgroup analysis revealed that Ep-CAM expression was a prognostic marker in node-positive (p < 0.0001) but not in node-negative (p = 0.58) breast cancer patients. Intriguingly, Ep-CAM expression was predictive for a dismal prognosis in patients receiving adjuvant cytotoxic (p = 0.03) or hormonal therapy (p < 0.0001) but not in untreated patients (p = 0.41). In summary, this study provides strong evidence that expression of Ep-CAM is a powerful marker of poor prognosis in node-positive invasive breast carcinoma and a potential predictive marker of sensitivity to adjuvant hormonal and/or cytotoxic treatment modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15567937     DOI: 10.1023/B:BREA.0000036787.59816.01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  88 in total

Review 1.  EpCAM and its potential role in tumor-initiating cells.

Authors:  Sannia Imrich; Matthias Hachmeister; Olivier Gires
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  A Fluorescent Imaging Probe Based on a Macrocyclic Scaffold That Binds to Cellular EpCAM.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Iwasaki; Yuki Goto; Takayuki Katoh; Taro Yamashita; Shuichi Kaneko; Hiroaki Suga
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Nuclear signalling by tumour-associated antigen EpCAM.

Authors:  Dorothea Maetzel; Sabine Denzel; Brigitte Mack; Martin Canis; Philip Went; Michael Benk; Cuong Kieu; Peer Papior; Patrick A Baeuerle; Markus Munz; Olivier Gires
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2009-01-11       Impact factor: 28.824

4.  Expression of the GA733 gene family and its relationship to prognosis in pulmonary adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hiromi Kobayashi; Yuko Minami; Yoichi Anami; Yuzuru Kondou; Tatsuo Iijima; Junko Kano; Yukio Morishita; Koji Tsuta; Shinichiro Hayashi; Masayuki Noguchi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  A high-content screen for small-molecule regulators of epithelial cell-adhesion molecule (EpCAM) cleavage yields a robust inhibitor.

Authors:  Jana Ylva Tretter; Kenji Schorpp; Elke Luxenburger; Johannes Trambauer; Harald Steiner; Kamyar Hadian; Olivier Gires; Dierk Niessing
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  A double-negative feedback loop between EpCAM and ERK contributes to the regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer.

Authors:  N V Sankpal; T P Fleming; P K Sharma; H J Wiedner; W E Gillanders
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Systematic analysis and validation of differential gene expression in ovarian serous adenocarcinomas and normal ovary.

Authors:  Dirk Bauerschlag; Karen Bräutigam; Roland Moll; Jalid Sehouli; Alexander Mustea; Darius Salehin; Maryla Krajewska; John C Reed; Nicolai Maass; Garret M Hampton; Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) is overexpressed in breast cancer metastases.

Authors:  Ashley Cimino; Marc Halushka; Peter Illei; Xinyan Wu; Saraswati Sukumar; Pedram Argani
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Transcriptional repression of epithelial cell adhesion molecule contributes to p53 control of breast cancer invasion.

Authors:  Narendra V Sankpal; Michael W Willman; Timothy P Fleming; John D Mayfield; William E Gillanders
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Initial activation of EpCAM cleavage via cell-to-cell contact.

Authors:  Sabine Denzel; Dorothea Maetzel; Brigitte Mack; Carola Eggert; Gabriele Bärr; Olivier Gires
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.