Literature DB >> 17255266

An integrated clinical-genomics approach identifies a candidate multi-analyte blood test for serous ovarian carcinoma.

Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein1, Dirk Bauerschlag, Yingyao Zhou, Lisa M Sapinoso, Keith Ching, Henry Frierson, Karen Bräutigam, Jalid Sehouli, Elmar Stickeler, Dominique Könsgen, Felix Hilpert, Constantin S von Kaisenberg, Jacobus Pfisterer, Thomas Bauknecht, Walter Jonat, Norbert Arnold, Garret M Hampton.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cancer of the ovary confers the worst prognosis among women with gynecologic malignancies, underscoring the need to develop new biomarkers for detection of early disease, particularly those that can be readily monitored in the blood. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We developed an algorithm to identify secreted proteins encoded among approximately 22,500 genes on commercial oligonucleotide arrays and applied it to gene expression profiles of 67 stage I to IV serous papillary carcinomas and 9 crudely enriched normal ovarian tissues, to identify putative diagnostic markers. ELISAs were used to validate increased levels of secreted proteins in patient sera encoded by genes with differentially high expression.
RESULTS: We identified 275 genes predicted to encode secreted proteins with increased/decreased expression in ovarian cancers (<0.5- or >2-fold, P < 0.001). The serum levels of four of these proteins (matrix metalloproteinase-7, osteopontin, secretory leukoprotease inhibitor, and kallikrein 10) were significantly elevated in a series of 67 independent patients with serous ovarian carcinomas compared with 67 healthy controls (P < 0.001, Wilcoxon rank sum test). Optimized support vector machine classifiers with as few as two of these markers (osteopontin or kallikrein 10/matrix metalloproteinase-7) in combination with CA-125 yielded sensitivity and specificity values ranging from 96% to 98.7% and 99.7% to 100%, respectively, with the ability to discern early-stage disease from normal, healthy controls.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that this assay combination warrants further investigation as a multi-analyte diagnostic test for serous ovarian adenocarcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17255266     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  17 in total

Review 1.  Integrating high-throughput technologies in the quest for effective biomarkers for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Vathany Kulasingam; Maria P Pavlou; Eleftherios P Diamandis
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Confounding effects of hormone replacement therapy in protein biomarker studies.

Authors:  Sharon J Pitteri; Samir M Hanash
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Role of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations in epithelial ovarian cancer in Indian population: a pilot study.

Authors:  Shikha Sharma; Shalini Rajaram; Tusha Sharma; Neerja Goel; Sarla Agarwal; Basu Dev Banerjee
Journal:  Int J Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2014-05-15

4.  A Pilot Study Evaluating Serum MMP7 as a Preoperative Prognostic Marker for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients.

Authors:  Sam C Wang; Justin R Parekh; Matthew R Porembka; Hari Nathan; Michael I D'Angelica; Ronald P DeMatteo; Yuman Fong; T Peter Kingham; William R Jarnagin; Peter J Allen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Systematic analysis and validation of differential gene expression in ovarian serous adenocarcinomas and normal ovary.

Authors:  Dirk Bauerschlag; Karen Bräutigam; Roland Moll; Jalid Sehouli; Alexander Mustea; Darius Salehin; Maryla Krajewska; John C Reed; Nicolai Maass; Garret M Hampton; Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 6.  Ovarian cancer: involvement of the matrix metalloproteinases.

Authors:  Linah Al-Alem; Thomas E Curry
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  The role of p53 as a surrogate marker for chemotherapeutical responsiveness in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Dirk O Bauerschlag; Christian Schem; Marion T Weigel; Constantin Von Kaisenberg; Alexander Strauss; Thomas Bauknecht; Nicolai Maass; Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Clinical utility of circulating matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7), CC chemokine ligand 18 (CCL18) and CC chemokine ligand 11 (CCL11) as markers for diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Samir F Zohny; Salah T Fayed
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  Mining the ovarian cancer ascites proteome for potential ovarian cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Cynthia Kuk; Vathany Kulasingam; C Geeth Gunawardana; Chris R Smith; Ihor Batruch; Eleftherios P Diamandis
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  Diagnostic values of osteopontin combined with CA125 for ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhu Lan; Dan Fu; Xiuzhang Yu; Mingrong Xi
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.