Literature DB >> 23089290

From shared contexts to syntactic categories: the role of distributional information in learning linguistic form-classes.

Patricia A Reeder1, Elissa L Newport, Richard N Aslin.   

Abstract

A fundamental component of language acquisition involves organizing words into grammatical categories. Previous literature has suggested a number of ways in which this categorization task might be accomplished. Here we ask whether the patterning of the words in a corpus of linguistic input (distributional information) is sufficient, along with a small set of learning biases, to extract these underlying structural categories. In a series of experiments, we show that learners can acquire linguistic form-classes, generalizing from instances of the distributional contexts of individual words in the exposure set to the full range of contexts for all the words in the set. Crucially, we explore how several specific distributional variables enable learners to form a category of lexical items and generalize to novel words, yet also allow for exceptions that maintain lexical specificity. We suggest that learners are sensitive to the contexts of individual words, the overlaps among contexts across words, the non-overlap of contexts (or systematic gaps in information), and the size of the exposure set. We also ask how learners determine the category membership of a new word for which there is very sparse contextual information. We find that, when there are strong category cues and robust category learning of other words, adults readily generalize the distributional properties of the learned category to a new word that shares just one context with the other category members. However, as the distributional cues regarding the category become sparser and contain more consistent gaps, learners show more conservatism in generalizing distributional properties to the novel word. Taken together, these results show that learners are highly systematic in their use of the distributional properties of the input corpus, using them in a principled way to determine when to generalize and when to preserve lexical specificity.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23089290      PMCID: PMC3621024          DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  20 in total

1.  Linguistic determinism and the part of speech.

Authors:  R W BROWN
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1957-07

2.  Category induction via distributional analysis: Evidence from a serial reaction time task.

Authors:  Ruskin H Hunt; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  The differential role of phonological and distributional cues in grammatical categorisation.

Authors:  Padraic Monaghan; Nick Chater; Morten H Christiansen
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004-12-24

Review 4.  Using sound to solve syntactic problems: the role of phonology in grammatical category assignments.

Authors:  M H Kelly
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Decisions, decisions: infant language learning when multiple generalizations are possible.

Authors:  LouAnn Gerken
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-06-29

6.  Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge.

Authors:  R L Gomez; L Gerken
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-03-01

8.  Frequent frames as a cue for grammatical categories in child directed speech.

Authors:  Toben H Mintz
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-11

9.  Category induction from distributional cues in an artificial language.

Authors:  Toben H Mintz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-07

10.  Word learning as Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Fei Xu; Joshua B Tenenbaum
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  35 in total

1.  The effect of Zipfian frequency variations on category formation in adult artificial language learning.

Authors:  Kathryn D Schuler; Patricia A Reeder; Elissa L Newport; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2017-08-02

Review 2.  Domain generality versus modality specificity: the paradox of statistical learning.

Authors:  Ram Frost; Blair C Armstrong; Noam Siegelman; Morten H Christiansen
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Where are the cookies? Two- and three-year-olds use number-marked verbs to anticipate upcoming nouns.

Authors:  Cynthia Lukyanenko; Cynthia Fisher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-11-09

4.  Learning bundles of stimuli renders stimulus order as a cue, not a confound.

Authors:  Ting Qian; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Learning Additional Languages as Hierarchical Probabilistic Inference: Insights From First Language Processing.

Authors:  Bozena Pajak; Alex B Fine; Dave F Kleinschmidt; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Lang Learn       Date:  2016-03-14

6.  Distributional learning aids linguistic category formation in school-age children.

Authors:  Jessica Hall; Amanda Owen VAN Horne; Thomas Farmer
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2017-11-10

7.  Input Variability Facilitates Unguided Subcategory Learning in Adults.

Authors:  Sunniva Sørhus Eidsvåg; Margit Austad; Elena Plante; Arve E Asbjørnsen
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Statistical Learning of Multiple Structures by 8-Month-Old Infants.

Authors:  Federica Bulgarelli; Viridiana Benitez; Jenny Saffran; Krista Byers-Heinlein; Daniel J Weiss
Journal:  Proc Annu Boston Univ Conf Lang Dev       Date:  2017-05

9.  Anchors aweigh: The impact of overlearning on entrenchment effects in statistical learning.

Authors:  Federica Bulgarelli; Daniel J Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Distributional Learning in College Students With Developmental Language Disorder.

Authors:  Jessica Hall; Amanda Owen Van Horne; Karla K McGregor; Thomas Farmer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.