Literature DB >> 23088391

The impact of hospital pay-for-performance on hospital and Medicare costs.

Gregory B Kruse1, Daniel Polsky, Elizabeth A Stuart, Rachel M Werner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of Medicare's hospital pay-for-performance demonstration project on hospital revenues, costs, and margins and on Medicare costs. DATA SOURCES/STUDY
SETTING: All health care utilization for Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI; ICD-9-CM code 410.x1) in fiscal years 2002-2005 from Medicare claims, containing 420,211 admissions with AMI. STUDY
DESIGN: We test for changes in hospital costs and revenues and Medicare payments among 260 hospitals participating in the Medicare hospital pay-for-performance demonstration project and a group of 780 propensity-score-matched comparison hospitals. Effects were estimated using a difference-in-difference model with hospital fixed effects, testing for changes in costs among pay-for-performance hospitals above and beyond changes in comparison hospitals. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: We found no significant effect of pay-for-performance on hospital financials (revenues, costs, and margins) or Medicare payments (index hospitalization and 1 year after admission) for AMI patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Pay-for-performance in the CMS hospital demonstration project had minimal impact on hospital financials and Medicare payments to providers. As P4P extends to all hospitals under the Affordable Care Act, these results provide some estimates of the impact of P4P and emphasize our need for a better understanding of the financial implications of P4P on providers and payers if we want to create sustainable and effective programs to improve health care value. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23088391      PMCID: PMC3523367          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  14 in total

1.  Hospital cost of care, quality of care, and readmission rates: penny wise and pound foolish?

Authors:  Lena M Chen; Ashish K Jha; Stuart Guterman; Abigail B Ridgway; E John Orav; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-02-22

2.  What's the return? Assessing the effect of "pay-for-performance" initiatives on the quality of care delivery.

Authors:  Stephen R Grossbart
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.929

3.  Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement.

Authors:  Peter K Lindenauer; Denise Remus; Sheila Roman; Michael B Rothberg; Evan M Benjamin; Allen Ma; Dale W Bratzler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Pay for performance in the hospital setting: what is the state of the evidence?

Authors:  Ateev Mehrotra; Cheryl L Damberg; Melony E S Sorbero; Stephanie S Teleki
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 1.852

5.  The effect of pay-for-performance in hospitals: lessons for quality improvement.

Authors:  Rachel M Werner; Jonathan T Kolstad; Elizabeth A Stuart; Daniel Polsky
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.

Authors:  A Elixhauser; C Steiner; D R Harris; R M Coffey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  A qualitative study of increasing beta-blocker use after myocardial infarction: Why do some hospitals succeed?

Authors:  E H Bradley; E S Holmboe; J A Mattera; S A Roumanis; M J Radford; H M Krumholz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001 May 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The long-term effect of premier pay for performance on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; Karen E Joynt; E John Orav; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Pay for performance, quality of care, and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Seth W Glickman; Fang-Shu Ou; Elizabeth R DeLong; Matthew T Roe; Barbara L Lytle; Jyotsna Mulgund; John S Rumsfeld; W Brian Gibler; E Magnus Ohman; Kevin A Schulman; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  What are hospitals doing to increase beta-blocker use?

Authors:  Elizabeth H Bradley; Eric S Holmboe; Yongfei Wang; Jeph Herrin; Paul D Frederick; Jennifer A Mattera; Sarah A Roumanis; Martha J Radford; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Saf       Date:  2003-08
View more
  14 in total

1.  Measuring Success in Health Care Value-Based Purchasing Programs: Findings from an Environmental Scan, Literature Review, and Expert Panel Discussions.

Authors:  Cheryl L Damberg; Melony E Sorbero; Susan L Lovejoy; Grant R Martsolf; Laura Raaen; Daniel Mandel
Journal:  Rand Health Q       Date:  2014-12-30

2.  Using Publicly Available Data to Construct a Transparent Measure of Health Care Value: A Method and Initial Results.

Authors:  William B Weeks; Gregory R Kotzbauer; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Introducing Value-Based Purchasing into TRICARE Reform.

Authors:  Susan D Hosek; Melony E Sorbero; Grant Martsolf; Ryan Kandrack
Journal:  Rand Health Q       Date:  2017-01-13

4.  A comparison of methods for health policy evaluation with controlled pre-post designs.

Authors:  Stephen O'Neill; Noemi Kreif; Matt Sutton; Richard Grieve
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Methods for constructing and assessing propensity scores.

Authors:  Melissa M Garrido; Amy S Kelley; Julia Paris; Katherine Roza; Diane E Meier; R Sean Morrison; Melissa D Aldridge
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  Reporting standards for guideline-based performance measures.

Authors:  Monika Nothacker; Tim Stokes; Beth Shaw; Patrice Lindsay; Raija Sipilä; Markus Follmann; Ina Kopp
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  Evaluating Clinical Practice Guidelines Based on Their Association with Return to Work in Administrative Claims Data.

Authors:  Eric T Roberts; Eva H DuGoff; Sara E Heins; David I Swedler; Renan C Castillo; Dorianne R Feldman; Stephen T Wegener; Vladimir Canudas-Romo; Gerard F Anderson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Pay for performance for hospitals.

Authors:  Tim Mathes; Dawid Pieper; Johannes Morche; Stephanie Polus; Thomas Jaschinski; Michaela Eikermann
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-07-05

9.  Effect of a national primary care pay for performance scheme on emergency hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: controlled longitudinal study.

Authors:  Mark J Harrison; Mark Dusheiko; Matt Sutton; Hugh Gravelle; Tim Doran; Martin Roland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-11-11

10.  Impact of health insurance status changes on healthcare utilisation patterns: a longitudinal cohort study in South Korea.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Kim; Sang Gyu Lee; Kwang-Soo Lee; Sung-In Jang; Kyung-Hee Cho; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.