Literature DB >> 19073941

Pay for performance in the hospital setting: what is the state of the evidence?

Ateev Mehrotra1, Cheryl L Damberg, Melony E S Sorbero, Stephanie S Teleki.   

Abstract

More than 40 private sector hospital pay-for-performance (P4P) programs now exist, and Congress is considering initiating a Medicare hospital P4P program. Given the growing interest in hospital P4P, this systematic review of the literature examines the current state of knowledge about the effect of P4P on clinical process measures, patient outcomes and experience, safety, and resource utilization. Little formal evaluation of hospital P4P has occurred, and most of the 8 published studies have methodological flaws. The most rigorous studies focus on clinical process measures and demonstrate that hospitals participating in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration, a P4P program, had a 2- to 4-percentage point greater improvement than the improvement observed in control hospitals. There is a need for more systematic evaluation of hospital P4P to understand its effect and whether the benefits of investing in P4P outweigh the associated costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19073941     DOI: 10.1177/1062860608326634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Qual        ISSN: 1062-8606            Impact factor:   1.852


  32 in total

1.  The use of three strategies to improve quality of care at a national level.

Authors:  Jeannette P P So; James G Wright
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Pediatric pay-for-performance in asthma: who pays?

Authors:  Rodney Johnson; Chitra Dinakar
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.806

3.  The effect of the MassHealth hospital pay-for-performance program on quality.

Authors:  Andrew M Ryan; Jan Blustein
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Using the lessons of behavioral economics to design more effective pay-for-performance programs.

Authors:  Ateev Mehrotra; Melony E S Sorbero; Cheryl L Damberg
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Using financial incentives to improve value in orthopaedics.

Authors:  David Lansky; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Setting standards at the forefront of delivery system reform: aligning care coordination quality measures for multiple chronic conditions.

Authors:  Eva H DuGoff; Sydney Dy; Erin R Giovannetti; Bruce Leff; Cynthia M Boyd
Journal:  J Healthc Qual       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.095

7.  CMS changes in reimbursement for HAIs: setting a research agenda.

Authors:  Patricia W Stone; Sherry A Glied; Peter D McNair; Nikolas Matthes; Bevin Cohen; Timothy F Landers; Elaine L Larson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 8.  Filling the gaps between performance incentive programs and health care quality improvement.

Authors:  Romana Hasnain-Wynia; Muriel Jean-Jacques
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 9.  Should the principle of "pay for performance" be applied to nutrition support?

Authors:  Nicholas Spoerke; Robert Martindale
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2009-08

Review 10.  Economic evaluation of pay-for-performance in health care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Martin Emmert; Frank Eijkenaar; Heike Kemter; Adelheid Susanne Esslinger; Oliver Schöffski
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-06-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.