Literature DB >> 23088250

Binding efficiency of protein-protein complexes.

Eric S Day1, Shaun M Cote, Adrian Whitty.   

Abstract

We examine the relationship between binding affinity and interface size for reversible protein-protein interactions (PPIs), using cytokines from the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily and their receptors as a test case. Using surface plasmon resonance, we measured single-site binding affinities for binding of the large receptor TNFR1 to its ligands TNFα (K(D) = 1.4 ± 0.4 nM) and lymphotoxin-α (K(D) = 50 ± 10 nM), and also for binding of the small receptor Fn14 to TWEAK (K(D) = 70 ± 10 nM). We additionally assembled data for all other TNF-TNFR family complexes for which reliable single-site binding affinities have been reported. We used these values to calculate the binding efficiencies, defined as binding energy per square angstrom of surface area buried at the contact interface, for nine of these complexes for which cocrystal structures are available, and compared the results to those for a set of 144 protein-protein complexes with published affinities. The results show that the most efficient PPI complexes generate ~20 cal mol(-1) Å(-2) of binding energy. A minimal contact area of ~500 Å(2) is required for a stable complex, required to generate sufficient interaction energy to pay the entropic cost of colocalizing two proteins from 1 M solution. The most compact and efficient TNF-TNFR complex was the BAFF-BR3 complex, which achieved ~80% of the maximal achievable binding efficiency. Other small receptors also gave high binding efficiencies, while the larger receptors generated only 44-49% of this limit despite interacting primarily through just a single small domain. The results provide new insight into how much binding energy can be generated by a PPI interface of a given size, and establish a quantitative method for predicting how large a natural or engineered contact interface must be to achieve a given level of binding affinity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23088250      PMCID: PMC3567247          DOI: 10.1021/bi301039t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  73 in total

1.  Structure of the TRAIL-DR5 complex reveals mechanisms conferring specificity in apoptotic initiation.

Authors:  J Mongkolsapaya; J M Grimes; N Chen; X N Xu; D I Stuart; E Y Jones; G R Screaton
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1999-11

2.  Crystallographic and mutational analysis of the CD40-CD154 complex and its implications for receptor activation.

Authors:  Hyun-Jung An; Young Jin Kim; Dong Hyun Song; Beom Suk Park; Ho Min Kim; Ju Dong Lee; Sang-Gi Paik; Jie-Oh Lee; Hayyoung Lee
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Picomolar affinity fibronectin domains engineered utilizing loop length diversity, recursive mutagenesis, and loop shuffling.

Authors:  Benjamin J Hackel; Atul Kapila; K Dane Wittrup
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 4.  Modularity in the TNF-receptor family.

Authors:  J H Naismith; S R Sprang
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 13.807

5.  Protection against endotoxic shock by a tumor necrosis factor receptor immunoadhesin.

Authors:  A Ashkenazi; S A Marsters; D J Capon; S M Chamow; I S Figari; D Pennica; D V Goeddel; M A Palladino; D H Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Structure-based development of a receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand (RANKL) inhibitor peptide and molecular basis for osteopetrosis.

Authors:  Hai Minh Ta; Giang Thi Tuyet Nguyen; Hye Mi Jin; Jongkeun Choi; Hyejin Park; Nacksung Kim; Hye-Yeon Hwang; Kyeong Kyu Kim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  TWEAK binding to the Fn14 cysteine-rich domain depends on charged residues located in both the A1 and D2 modules.

Authors:  Sharron A N Brown; Heather N Hanscom; Hong Vu; Shelesa A Brew; Jeffrey A Winkles
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 3.857

8.  Entropic contributions and the influence of the hydrophobic environment in promiscuous protein-protein association.

Authors:  Chia-En A Chang; William A McLaughlin; Riccardo Baron; Wei Wang; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Ongoing and future developments at the Universal Protein Resource.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Volume-based solvation models out-perform area-based models in combined studies of wild-type and mutated protein-protein interfaces.

Authors:  Salim Bougouffa; Jim Warwicker
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  18 in total

1.  Modeling protein-peptide recognition based on classical quantitative structure-affinity relationship approach: implication for proteome-wide inference of peptide-mediated interactions.

Authors:  Yang Zhou; Zhong Ni; Keping Chen; Haijun Liu; Liang Chen; Chaoqun Lian; Lirong Yan
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.371

2.  Noncompetitive inhibitors of TNFR1 probe conformational activation states.

Authors:  Chih Hung Lo; Tory M Schaaf; Benjamin D Grant; Colin Kin-Wye Lim; Prachi Bawaskar; Courtney C Aldrich; David D Thomas; Jonathan N Sachs
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 8.192

3.  The interface between hepatitis B virus capsid proteins affects self-assembly, pregenomic RNA packaging, and reverse transcription.

Authors:  Zhenning Tan; Karolyn Pionek; Nuruddin Unchwaniwala; Megan L Maguire; Daniel D Loeb; Adam Zlotnick
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 4.  Toward Small-Molecule Inhibition of Protein-Protein Interactions: General Aspects and Recent Progress in Targeting Costimulatory and Coinhibitory (Immune Checkpoint) Interactions.

Authors:  Damir Bojadzic; Peter Buchwald
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Crystal structure of a conformational antibody that binds tau oligomers and inhibits pathological seeding by extracts from donors with Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Romany Abskharon; Paul M Seidler; Michael R Sawaya; Duilio Cascio; Tianxiao P Yang; Stephan Philipp; Christopher Kazu Williams; Kathy L Newell; Bernardino Ghetti; Michael A DeTure; Dennis W Dickson; Harry V Vinters; Philip L Felgner; Rie Nakajima; Charles G Glabe; David S Eisenberg
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  The dimerization equilibrium of a ClC Cl(-)/H(+) antiporter in lipid bilayers.

Authors:  Rahul Chadda; Venkatramanan Krishnamani; Kacey Mersch; Jason Wong; Marley Brimberry; Ankita Chadda; Ludmila Kolmakova-Partensky; Larry J Friedman; Jeff Gelles; Janice L Robertson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Death Receptor 5 Activation Is Energetically Coupled to Opening of the Transmembrane Domain Dimer.

Authors:  Nagamani Vunnam; Cecily Kristine Campbell-Bezat; Andrew K Lewis; Jonathan N Sachs
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Quantitative single-molecule localization microscopy combined with rule-based modeling reveals ligand-induced TNF-R1 reorganization toward higher-order oligomers.

Authors:  Franziska Fricke; Sebastian Malkusch; Gaby Wangorsch; Johannes F Greiner; Barbara Kaltschmidt; Christian Kaltschmidt; Darius Widera; Thomas Dandekar; Mike Heilemann
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.304

9.  PilN Binding Modulates the Structure and Binding Partners of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Type IVa Pilus Protein PilM.

Authors:  Matthew McCallum; Stephanie Tammam; Dustin J Little; Howard Robinson; Jason Koo; Megha Shah; Charles Calmettes; Trevor F Moraes; Lori L Burrows; P Lynne Howell
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Conformational states of TNFR1 as a molecular switch for receptor function.

Authors:  Chih Hung Lo; Evan C Huber; Jonathan N Sachs
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.