Literature DB >> 28746849

Death Receptor 5 Activation Is Energetically Coupled to Opening of the Transmembrane Domain Dimer.

Nagamani Vunnam1, Cecily Kristine Campbell-Bezat1, Andrew K Lewis1, Jonathan N Sachs2.   

Abstract

The precise mechanism by which binding of tumor necrosis factor ligands to the extracellular domain of their corresponding receptors transmits signals across the plasma membrane has remained elusive. Recent studies have proposed that activation of several tumor necrosis factor receptors, including Death Receptor 5, involves a scissorlike opening of the disulfide-linked transmembrane (TM) dimer. Using time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer, we provide, to our knowledge, the first direct biophysical evidence that Death Receptor 5 TM-dimers open in response to ligand binding. Then, to probe the importance of the closed-to-open TM domain transition in the overall energetics of receptor activation, we designed point-mutants (alanine to phenylalanine) in the predicted, tightly packed TM domain dimer interface. We hypothesized that the bulky residues should destabilize the closed conformation and eliminate the ∼3 kcal/mol energy barrier to TM domain opening and the ∼2 kcal/mol energy difference between the closed and open states, thus oversensitizing the receptor. To test this, we used all-atom molecular dynamics simulations of the isolated TM domain in explicit lipid bilayers coupled to thermodynamic potential of mean force calculations. We showed that single point mutants at the interface altered the energy landscape as predicted, but were not enough to completely eliminate the barrier to opening. However, the computational model did predict that a double mutation at i, i+4 positions at the center of the TM domain dimer eliminates the barrier and stabilizes the open conformation relative to the closed. We tested these mutants in cells with time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer and death assays, and show remarkable agreement with the calculations. The single mutants had a small effect on TM domain separation and cell death, whereas the double mutant significantly increased the TM domain separation and more than doubled the sensitivity of cells to ligand stimulation.
Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28746849      PMCID: PMC5529174          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.05.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  68 in total

1.  Structure of the TRAIL-DR5 complex reveals mechanisms conferring specificity in apoptotic initiation.

Authors:  J Mongkolsapaya; J M Grimes; N Chen; X N Xu; D I Stuart; E Y Jones; G R Screaton
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1999-11

Review 2.  Structure elucidation of dimeric transmembrane domains of bitopic proteins.

Authors:  Eduard V Bocharov; Pavel E Volynsky; Konstantin V Pavlov; Roman G Efremov; Alexander S Arseniev
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  CHARMM-GUI: a web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM.

Authors:  Sunhwan Jo; Taehoon Kim; Vidyashankara G Iyer; Wonpil Im
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 4.  Transmembrane helix-helix interactions involved in ErbB receptor signaling.

Authors:  Florian Cymer; Dirk Schneider
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Mechanism of activation of protein kinase JAK2 by the growth hormone receptor.

Authors:  Andrew J Brooks; Wei Dai; Megan L O'Mara; Daniel Abankwa; Yash Chhabra; Rebecca A Pelekanos; Olivier Gardon; Kathryn A Tunny; Kristopher M Blucher; Craig J Morton; Michael W Parker; Emma Sierecki; Yann Gambin; Guillermo A Gomez; Kirill Alexandrov; Ian A Wilson; Manolis Doxastakis; Alan E Mark; Michael J Waters
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone φ, ψ and side-chain χ(1) and χ(2) dihedral angles.

Authors:  Robert B Best; Xiao Zhu; Jihyun Shim; Pedro E M Lopes; Jeetain Mittal; Michael Feig; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  NMR-based approach to measure the free energy of transmembrane helix-helix interactions.

Authors:  Konstantin S Mineev; Dmitry M Lesovoy; Dinara R Usmanova; Sergey A Goncharuk; Mikhail A Shulepko; Ekaterina N Lyukmanova; Mikhail P Kirpichnikov; Eduard V Bocharov; Alexander S Arseniev
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2013-09-10

8.  Binding efficiency of protein-protein complexes.

Authors:  Eric S Day; Shaun M Cote; Adrian Whitty
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Architecture and membrane interactions of the EGF receptor.

Authors:  Anton Arkhipov; Yibing Shan; Rahul Das; Nicholas F Endres; Michael P Eastwood; David E Wemmer; John Kuriyan; David E Shaw
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  The Fas-FADD death domain complex structure unravels signalling by receptor clustering.

Authors:  Fiona L Scott; Boguslaw Stec; Cristina Pop; Małgorzata K Dobaczewska; JeongEun J Lee; Edward Monosov; Howard Robinson; Guy S Salvesen; Robert Schwarzenbacher; Stefan J Riedl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  3 in total

1.  Noncompetitive inhibitors of TNFR1 probe conformational activation states.

Authors:  Chih Hung Lo; Tory M Schaaf; Benjamin D Grant; Colin Kin-Wye Lim; Prachi Bawaskar; Courtney C Aldrich; David D Thomas; Jonathan N Sachs
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 8.192

2.  Noncompetitive Allosteric Antagonism of Death Receptor 5 by a Synthetic Affibody Ligand.

Authors:  Nagamani Vunnam; Sophia Szymonski; Petra Hirsova; Gregory J Gores; Jonathan N Sachs; Benjamin J Hackel
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Conformational states of TNFR1 as a molecular switch for receptor function.

Authors:  Chih Hung Lo; Evan C Huber; Jonathan N Sachs
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 6.725

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.