Literature DB >> 24150505

Modeling protein-peptide recognition based on classical quantitative structure-affinity relationship approach: implication for proteome-wide inference of peptide-mediated interactions.

Yang Zhou1, Zhong Ni, Keping Chen, Haijun Liu, Liang Chen, Chaoqun Lian, Lirong Yan.   

Abstract

Peptide-mediated interactions are crucial to a variety of functions in the living cell and are estimated to be involved in up to 40 % of all cellular processes. Fast and reliable inference of such interactions is fundamentally important for our understanding and, then, reconstruction of complete virtual interactomics involved in a specific cell, tissue or organism. In the current study, we performed structure-level characterization, modeling and prediction of protein-peptide recognition specificity and stability in a high-throughput manner. To achieve this, the classical chemometrics methodology quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR), which is traditionally applied to small-molecule entities such as drug compounds and environmental chemicals, was employed to statistically correlate structure features with binding affinities for a panel of structure-solved, affinity-known protein-peptide complexes compiled from the PDB database and literatures. In the standard QSAR procedure, various structural descriptors including physicochemical, geometrical and constitutional parameters that characterize diverse aspects of protein-peptide interaction property were derived from the biomacromolecular complex structure architecture, and these descriptors were then correlated with experimentally measured affinities by using the partial least squares (PLS) regression and Gaussian process (GP) in conjunction with genetic algorithm (GA) variable selection. The nonlinear GA/GP method was found to perform much well as compared to linear GA/PLS modeling, suggesting that the protein-peptide interaction system is highly complicated that may involve strong noise and interactive effect. The optimal GA/GP model revealed that the interface size and solvent effect play a critical role in protein-peptide binding, and other properties such as peptide length and flexibility also contribute significantly to the binding. A further test on 2,018 human amphiphysin SH3 domain-binding peptides demonstrated that the purposed QSAR modeling procedure is very fast and effective, which can thus be readily used to perform proteome-wide inference of peptide-mediated interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24150505     DOI: 10.1007/s10930-013-9519-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein J        ISSN: 1572-3887            Impact factor:   2.371


  43 in total

1.  Factor analysis scales of generalized amino acid information as applied in predicting interactions between the human amphiphysin-1 SH3 domains and their peptide ligands.

Authors:  Guizhao Liang; Guohua Chen; Weihuan Niu; Zhiliang Li
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 2.817

2.  Characterization of domain-peptide interaction interface: a case study on the amphiphysin-1 SH3 domain.

Authors:  Tingjun Hou; Wei Zhang; David A Case; Wei Wang
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Gaussian process: an alternative approach for QSAM modeling of peptides.

Authors:  Peng Zhou; Xiang Chen; Yuqian Wu; Zhicai Shang
Journal:  Amino Acids       Date:  2009-01-04       Impact factor: 3.520

4.  Why ligand cross-reactivity is high within peptide recognition domain families? A case study on human c-Src SH3 domain.

Authors:  Ping He; Wei Wu; Hai-Dong Wang; Ke-Long Liao; Wei Zhang; Feng-Lin Lv; Kang Yang
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 5.  Macromolecular modeling with rosetta.

Authors:  Rhiju Das; David Baker
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 23.643

6.  Prediction of water and metal binding sites and their affinities by using the Fold-X force field.

Authors:  Joost W H Schymkowitz; Frederic Rousseau; Ivo C Martins; Jesper Ferkinghoff-Borg; Francois Stricher; Luis Serrano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins.

Authors:  I K McDonald; J M Thornton
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1994-05-20       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Binding efficiency of protein-protein complexes.

Authors:  Eric S Day; Shaun M Cote; Adrian Whitty
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  ProTherm and ProNIT: thermodynamic databases for proteins and protein-nucleic acid interactions.

Authors:  M D Shaji Kumar; K Abdulla Bava; M Michael Gromiha; Ponraj Prabakaran; Koji Kitajima; Hatsuho Uedaira; Akinori Sarai
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  3did: interacting protein domains of known three-dimensional structure.

Authors:  Amelie Stein; Robert B Russell; Patrick Aloy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  1 in total

1.  Network-based piecewise linear regression for QSAR modelling.

Authors:  Jonathan Cardoso-Silva; Lazaros G Papageorgiou; Sophia Tsoka
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.686

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.