Literature DB >> 23088232

Are all interventions created equal? A multi-threat approach to tailoring stereotype threat interventions.

Jenessa R Shapiro1, Amy M Williams, Mariam Hambarchyan.   

Abstract

To date, stereotype threat interventions have been considered interchangeable. Across 4 experiments, the present research demonstrates that stereotype threat interventions need to be tailored to the specific form of experienced stereotype threat to be effective. The Multi-Threat Framework (Shapiro & Neuberg, 2007) distinguishes between group-as-target stereotype threats-concerns that a stereotype-relevant performance will reflect poorly on the abilities of one's group-and self-as-target stereotype threats-concerns that a stereotype-relevant performance will reflect poorly on one's own abilities. The present experiments explored Black college students' performance on diagnostic intelligence tests (Experiments 1 and 3) and women's interest (Experiment 2) and performance (Experiment 4) in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). Across the 4 experiments, participants were randomly assigned to experience either a group-as-target or self-as-target stereotype threat. Experiments 1 and 2 revealed that role model interventions were successful at protecting only against group-as-target stereotype threats, and Experiments 3 and 4 revealed that self-affirmation interventions were successful at protecting only against self-as-target stereotype threats. The present research provides an experimental test of the Multi-Threat Framework across different negatively stereotyped groups (Black students, female students), different negatively stereotyped domains (general intelligence, STEM), and different outcomes (test performance, career interest). This research suggests that interventions should address the range of possible stereotype threats to effectively protect individuals against these threats. Through an appreciation of the distinct forms of stereotype threats and the ways in which interventions work to reduce them, this research aims to facilitate a more complete understanding of stereotype threat. (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23088232      PMCID: PMC3682115          DOI: 10.1037/a0030461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  16 in total

1.  Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm.

Authors:  L Ross; M R Lepper; M Hubbard
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1975-11

2.  STEMing the tide: using ingroup experts to inoculate women's self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).

Authors:  Jane G Stout; Nilanjana Dasgupta; Matthew Hunsinger; Melissa A McManus
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2011-02

3.  We can do it: the interplay of construal orientation and social comparisons under threat.

Authors:  David M Marx; Diederik A Stapel; Dominique Muller
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2005-03

4.  Clearing the air: the effect of experimenter race on target's test performance and subjective experience.

Authors:  David M Marx; Phillip Atiba Goff
Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol       Date:  2005-12

5.  Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity.

Authors:  Toni Schmader; Michael Johns
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2003-09

6.  Recursive processes in self-affirmation: intervening to close the minority achievement gap.

Authors:  Geoffrey L Cohen; Julio Garcia; Valerie Purdie-Vaughns; Nancy Apfel; Patricia Brzustoski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Different groups, different threats: a multi-threat approach to the experience of stereotype threats.

Authors:  Jenessa R Shapiro
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2011-04

8.  Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.

Authors:  C M Steele; J Aronson
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1995-11

9.  Reducing the gender achievement gap in college science: a classroom study of values affirmation.

Authors:  Akira Miyake; Lauren E Kost-Smith; Noah D Finkelstein; Steven J Pollock; Geoffrey L Cohen; Tiffany A Ito
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Affirmed yet unaware: exploring the role of awareness in the process of self-affirmation.

Authors:  David K Sherman; Geoffrey L Cohen; Leif D Nelson; A David Nussbaum; Debra P Bunyan; Julio Garcia
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-11
View more
  8 in total

1.  Associations of spontaneous self-affirmation with health care experiences and health information seeking in a national survey of US adults.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taber; Jennifer L Howell; Amber S Emanuel; William M P Klein; Rebecca A Ferrer; Peter R Harris
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2015-09-28

Review 2.  An Examination of Age-Based Stereotype Threat About Cognitive Decline.

Authors:  Sarah J Barber
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-01

Review 3.  Twenty Years of Stereotype Threat Research: A Review of Psychological Mediators.

Authors:  Charlotte R Pennington; Derek Heim; Andrew R Levy; Derek T Larkin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Exams disadvantage women in introductory biology.

Authors:  Cissy J Ballen; Shima Salehi; Sehoya Cotner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Applying the multi-threat framework of stereotype threat in the context of digital gaming.

Authors:  Charlotte R Pennington; Linda K Kaye; Joseph J McCann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Which role models are effective for which students? A systematic review and four recommendations for maximizing the effectiveness of role models in STEM.

Authors:  Jessica R Gladstone; Andrei Cimpian
Journal:  Int J STEM Educ       Date:  2021-12-02

7.  Cognitive Difficulty and Format of Exams Predicts Gender and Socioeconomic Gaps in Exam Performance of Students in Introductory Biology Courses.

Authors:  Christian D Wright; Sarah L Eddy; Mary Pat Wenderoth; Elizabeth Abshire; Margaret Blankenbiller; Sara E Brownell
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 8.  Addressing Stereotype Threat is Critical to Diversity and Inclusion in Organizational Psychology.

Authors:  Bettina J Casad; William J Bryant
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.