BACKGROUND: Classification of risk of ischemic stroke is important for medical care and public health reasons. Whether addition of biomarkers adds to predictive power of the Framingham Stroke Risk or other traditional risk factors has not been studied in older women. METHODS: The Hormones and Biomarkers Predicting Stroke Study is a case-control study of blood biomarkers assayed in 972 ischemic stroke cases and 972 controls, nested in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study of 93, 676 postmenopausal women followed for an average of eight-years. We evaluated additive predictive value of two commercially available biomarkers: C-reactive protein and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 to determine if they added to risk prediction by the Framingham Stroke Risk Score or by traditional risk factors, which included lipids and other variables not included in the Framingham Stroke Risk Score. As measures of additive predictive value, we used the C-statistic, net reclassification improvement, category-less net reclassification improvement, and integrated discrimination improvement index. RESULTS: Addition of C-reactive protein to Framingham risk models or additional traditional risk factors overall modestly improved prediction of ischemic stroke and resulted in overall net reclassification improvement of 6·3%, (case net reclassification improvement=3·9%, control net reclassification improvement=2·4%). In particular, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was useful in prediction of cardioembolic strokes (net reclassification improvement=12·0%; 95% confidence interval 4·3-19·6%) and in strokes occurring in less than three-years (net reclassification improvement=7·9%, 95% confidence interval 0·8-14·9%). Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 was useful in risk prediction of large artery strokes (net reclassification improvement=19·8%, 95% confidence interval 7·4-32·1%) and in early strokes (net reclassification improvement=5·8%, 95% confidence interval 0·4-11·2%). CONCLUSIONS: C-reactive protein and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 can improve prediction of certain subtypes of ischemic stroke in older women, over the Framingham stroke risk model and traditional risk factors, and may help to guide surveillance and treatment of women at risk.
BACKGROUND: Classification of risk of ischemic stroke is important for medical care and public health reasons. Whether addition of biomarkers adds to predictive power of the Framingham Stroke Risk or other traditional risk factors has not been studied in older women. METHODS: The Hormones and Biomarkers Predicting Stroke Study is a case-control study of blood biomarkers assayed in 972 ischemic stroke cases and 972 controls, nested in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study of 93, 676 postmenopausal women followed for an average of eight-years. We evaluated additive predictive value of two commercially available biomarkers: C-reactive protein and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 to determine if they added to risk prediction by the Framingham Stroke Risk Score or by traditional risk factors, which included lipids and other variables not included in the Framingham Stroke Risk Score. As measures of additive predictive value, we used the C-statistic, net reclassification improvement, category-less net reclassification improvement, and integrated discrimination improvement index. RESULTS: Addition of C-reactive protein to Framingham risk models or additional traditional risk factors overall modestly improved prediction of ischemic stroke and resulted in overall net reclassification improvement of 6·3%, (case net reclassification improvement=3·9%, control net reclassification improvement=2·4%). In particular, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was useful in prediction of cardioembolic strokes (net reclassification improvement=12·0%; 95% confidence interval 4·3-19·6%) and in strokes occurring in less than three-years (net reclassification improvement=7·9%, 95% confidence interval 0·8-14·9%). Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 was useful in risk prediction of large artery strokes (net reclassification improvement=19·8%, 95% confidence interval 7·4-32·1%) and in early strokes (net reclassification improvement=5·8%, 95% confidence interval 0·4-11·2%). CONCLUSIONS:C-reactive protein and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 can improve prediction of certain subtypes of ischemic stroke in older women, over the Framingham stroke risk model and traditional risk factors, and may help to guide surveillance and treatment of women at risk.
Authors: Jennifer Hays; Julie R Hunt; F Allan Hubbell; Garnet L Anderson; Marian Limacher; Catherine Allen; Jacques E Rossouw Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Peter J Zimetbaum; Amit Thosani; Hsing-Ting Yu; Yan Xiong; Jay Lin; Prajesh Kothawala; Matthew Emons Journal: Am J Med Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Lori Mosca; Emelia J Benjamin; Kathy Berra; Judy L Bezanson; Rowena J Dolor; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; L Kristin Newby; Ileana L Piña; Véronique L Roger; Leslee J Shaw; Dong Zhao; Theresa M Beckie; Cheryl Bushnell; Jeanine D'Armiento; Penny M Kris-Etherton; Jing Fang; Theodore G Ganiats; Antoinette S Gomes; Clarisa R Gracia; Constance K Haan; Elizabeth A Jackson; Debra R Judelson; Ellie Kelepouris; Carl J Lavie; Anne Moore; Nancy A Nussmeier; Elizabeth Ofili; Suzanne Oparil; Pamela Ouyang; Vivian W Pinn; Katherine Sherif; Sidney C Smith; George Sopko; Nisha Chandra-Strobos; Elaine M Urbina; Viola Vaccarino; Nanette K Wenger Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-02-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Christie M Ballantyne; Ron C Hoogeveen; Heejung Bang; Josef Coresh; Aaron R Folsom; Lloyd E Chambless; Merle Myerson; Kenneth K Wu; A Richey Sharrett; Eric Boerwinkle Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2005-11-28
Authors: Paul M Ridker; Eleanor Danielson; Francisco A H Fonseca; Jacques Genest; Antonio M Gotto; John J P Kastelein; Wolfgang Koenig; Peter Libby; Alberto J Lorenzatti; Jean G MacFadyen; Børge G Nordestgaard; James Shepherd; James T Willerson; Robert J Glynn Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-11-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alexander Thompson; Pei Gao; Lia Orfei; Sarah Watson; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Stephen Kaptoge; Christie Ballantyne; Christopher P Cannon; Michael Criqui; Mary Cushman; Albert Hofman; Chris Packard; Simon G Thompson; Rory Collins; John Danesh Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-05-01 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Patrick W Serruys; Héctor M García-García; Pawel Buszman; Paul Erne; Stefan Verheye; Michael Aschermann; Henrikus Duckers; Oyvind Bleie; Dariusz Dudek; Hans Erik Bøtker; Clemens von Birgelen; Don D'Amico; Tammy Hutchinson; Andrew Zambanini; Frits Mastik; Gerrit-Anne van Es; Antonius F W van der Steen; D Geoffrey Vince; Peter Ganz; Christian W Hamm; William Wijns; Andrew Zalewski Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-09-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller; Susan L Hendrix; Marian Limacher; Gerardo Heiss; Charles Kooperberg; Alison Baird; Theodore Kotchen; J David Curb; Henry Black; Jacques E Rossouw; Aaron Aragaki; Monika Safford; Evan Stein; Somchai Laowattana; W Jerry Mysiw Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-05-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Robert D Langer; Emily White; Cora E Lewis; Jane M Kotchen; Susan L Hendrix; Maurizio Trevisan Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Carla A Ibrahim-Verbaas; Myriam Fornage; Joshua C Bis; Seung Hoan Choi; Bruce M Psaty; James B Meigs; Madhu Rao; Mike Nalls; Joao D Fontes; Christopher J O'Donnell; Sekar Kathiresan; Georg B Ehret; Caroline S Fox; Rainer Malik; Martin Dichgans; Helena Schmidt; Jari Lahti; Susan R Heckbert; Thomas Lumley; Kenneth Rice; Jerome I Rotter; Kent D Taylor; Aaron R Folsom; Eric Boerwinkle; Wayne D Rosamond; Eyal Shahar; Rebecca F Gottesman; Peter J Koudstaal; Najaf Amin; Renske G Wieberdink; Abbas Dehghan; Albert Hofman; André G Uitterlinden; Anita L Destefano; Stephanie Debette; Luting Xue; Alexa Beiser; Philip A Wolf; Charles Decarli; M Arfan Ikram; Sudha Seshadri; Thomas H Mosley; W T Longstreth; Cornelia M van Duijn; Lenore J Launer Journal: Stroke Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Nancy R Cook; Nina P Paynter; Joann E Manson; Lisa W Martin; Jennifer G Robinson; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller; Paul M Ridker Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2012-08-02 Impact factor: 8.327