BACKGROUND: Findings regarding the association of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A₂ (Lp-PLA2) activity and mass with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) have been inconsistent, and their role in risk prediction is uncertain. METHODS: A case-cohort sample from the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study (WHI-OS) comprised 1821 CVD cases and a reference subcohort of 1992 women. We used Cox regression models with inverse sampling weights to assess the association of Lp-PLA2 mass and activity with CVD (myocardial infarction, stroke, and CVD mortality). RESULTS: Subcohort means were 184.3 mmol/min/mL for Lp-PLA2 activity and 499.2 μg/L for Lp-PLA2 mass, with 99% having mass above 200 μg/L, the clinically recommended cut point. Both activity and mass were positively associated with incident CVD in age- and race/ethnicity-adjusted analyses. Following adjustment according to CVD risk factors, the association with activity became null (hazard ratio = 1.02 for top vs bottom quartile, 95% CI = 0.79-1.33, P for trend = 0.65), but the association with mass remained (hazard ratio = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.45-2.34, P for trend < 0.0001). In contrast to blood pressure, HDL, and hsCRP, reclassification statistics for Lp-PLA2 mass did not suggest improvement for overall CVD after full adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: In the WHI-OS Lp-PLA2 mass, but not activity, was independently associated with CVD. However, model fit did not significantly improve with Lp-PLA2 mass, and assay calibration remains a clinical concern.
BACKGROUND: Findings regarding the association of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A₂ (Lp-PLA2) activity and mass with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) have been inconsistent, and their role in risk prediction is uncertain. METHODS: A case-cohort sample from the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study (WHI-OS) comprised 1821 CVD cases and a reference subcohort of 1992 women. We used Cox regression models with inverse sampling weights to assess the association of Lp-PLA2 mass and activity with CVD (myocardial infarction, stroke, and CVD mortality). RESULTS: Subcohort means were 184.3 mmol/min/mL for Lp-PLA2 activity and 499.2 μg/L for Lp-PLA2 mass, with 99% having mass above 200 μg/L, the clinically recommended cut point. Both activity and mass were positively associated with incident CVD in age- and race/ethnicity-adjusted analyses. Following adjustment according to CVD risk factors, the association with activity became null (hazard ratio = 1.02 for top vs bottom quartile, 95% CI = 0.79-1.33, P for trend = 0.65), but the association with mass remained (hazard ratio = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.45-2.34, P for trend < 0.0001). In contrast to blood pressure, HDL, and hsCRP, reclassification statistics for Lp-PLA2 mass did not suggest improvement for overall CVD after full adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: In the WHI-OSLp-PLA2 mass, but not activity, was independently associated with CVD. However, model fit did not significantly improve with Lp-PLA2 mass, and assay calibration remains a clinical concern.
Authors: J David Curb; Anne McTiernan; Susan R Heckbert; Charles Kooperberg; Janet Stanford; Michael Nevitt; Karen C Johnson; Lori Proulx-Burns; Lisa Pastore; Michael Criqui; Sandra Daugherty Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: C J Packard; D S O'Reilly; M J Caslake; A D McMahon; I Ford; J Cooney; C H Macphee; K E Suckling; M Krishna; F E Wilkinson; A Rumley; G D Lowe Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-10-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alexander Thompson; Pei Gao; Lia Orfei; Sarah Watson; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Stephen Kaptoge; Christie Ballantyne; Christopher P Cannon; Michael Criqui; Mary Cushman; Albert Hofman; Chris Packard; Simon G Thompson; Rory Collins; John Danesh Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-05-01 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Robert D Langer; Emily White; Cora E Lewis; Jane M Kotchen; Susan L Hendrix; Maurizio Trevisan Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller; Aileen McGinn; Matthew Allison; Tianxi Ca; David Curb; Charles Eaton; Susan Hendrix; Robert Kaplan; Marcia Ko; Lisa W Martin; Xiaonan Xue Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2012-10-23 Impact factor: 5.266
Authors: Bernhard M Kaess; Tonia de Las Heras Gala; Astrid Zierer; Christa Meisinger; Simone Wahl; Annette Peters; John Todd; Christian Herder; Cornelia Huth; Barbara Thorand; Wolfgang Koenig Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2017-06-05 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Mira Katan; Yeseon P Moon; Myunghee C Paik; Robert L Wolfert; Ralph L Sacco; Mitchell S V Elkind Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-01-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Giuseppe Maiolino; Luigi Pedon; Maurizio Cesari; Anna Chiara Frigo; Robert L Wolfert; Marlena Barisa; Leopoldo Pagliani; Giacomo Rossitto; Teresa Maria Seccia; Mario Zanchetta; Gian Paolo Rossi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-10-31 Impact factor: 3.240