Literature DB >> 23086798

Hospital volume, proportion resected and mortality from oesophageal and gastric cancer: a population-based study in England, 2004-2008.

Victoria H Coupland1, Jesper Lagergren, Margreet Lüchtenborg, Ruth H Jack, William Allum, Lars Holmberg, George B Hanna, Neil Pearce, Henrik Møller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the associations between hospital volume, resection rate and survival of oesophageal and gastric cancer patients in England.
DESIGN: 62,811 patients diagnosed with oesophageal or gastric cancer between 2004 and 2008 were identified from a national population-based cancer registration and Hospital Episode Statistics-linked dataset. Cox regression analyses were used to assess all-cause mortality according to hospital volume and resection rate, adjusting for case-mix variables (sex, age, socioeconomic deprivation, comorbidity and type of cancer). HRs and 95% CIs, according to hospital volume, were evaluated for three predefined periods following surgery: <30, 30-365, and >365 days. Analysis of mortality in relation to resection rate was performed among all patients and among the 13 189 (21%) resected patients.
RESULTS: Increasing hospital volume was associated with lower mortality (p trend=0.0001; HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.95 for hospitals resecting 80+ and compared with <20 patients a year). In relative terms, the association between increasing hospital volume and lower mortality was particularly strong in the first 30 days following surgery (p trend<0.0001; HR 0.52, (0.39 to 0.70)), but a clinically relevant association remained beyond 1 year (p trend=0.0011; HR 0.82, (0.72 to 0.95)). Increasing resection rates were associated with lower mortality among all patients (p trend<0.0001; HR 0.86, (0.84 to 0.89) for the highest, compared with the lowest resection quintile).
CONCLUSIONS: With evidence of lower short-term and longer-term mortality for patients resected in high-volume hospitals, this study supports further centralisation of oesophageal and gastric cancer surgical services in England.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric Cancer; Oesophageal Cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23086798     DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  50 in total

1.  Perioperative outcomes of esophageal cancer surgery in a mid-volume institution in the era of centralization.

Authors:  Silvio Däster; Savas D Soysal; Luca Koechlin; Lea Stoll; Ralph Peterli; Markus von Flüe; Christoph Ackermann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  Quality Management and Key Performance Indicators in Oncologic Esophageal Surgery.

Authors:  Ines Gockel; Constantin Johannes Ahlbrand; Michael Arras; Elke Maria Schreiber; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  [Economic aspects of oncological esophageal surgery : Centralization is essential].

Authors:  N von Dercks; I Gockel; M Mehdorn; D Lorenz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Surgical resection of gastric cancer hepatic metastases: expanding the indications for curative treatment.

Authors:  Sheraz R Markar; George B Hanna
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-10-29

5.  Hospital type- and volume-outcome relationships in esophageal cancer patients receiving non-surgical treatments.

Authors:  Po-Kuei Hsu; Hui-Shan Chen; Bing-Yen Wang; Shiao-Chi Wu; Chao-Yu Liu; Chih-Hsun Shih; Chia-Chuan Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  The impact of blood transfusion on perioperative outcomes following gastric cancer resection: an analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

Authors:  Maryam Elmi; Alyson Mahar; Daniel Kagedan; Calvin H L Law; Paul J Karanicolas; Yulia Lin; Jeannie Callum; Natalie G Coburn; Julie Hallet
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  [Hospital volume effects in surgical treatment of gastric cancer : Results of a prospective multicenter observational study].

Authors:  H Ptok; I Gastinger; F Meyer; A Ilsemann; H Lippert; C Bruns
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Antisense Long Noncoding RNA HIF1A-AS2 Is Upregulated in Gastric Cancer and Associated with Poor Prognosis.

Authors:  Wen-Ming Chen; Ming-de Huang; Rong Kong; Tong-Peng Xu; Er-Bao Zhang; Rui Xia; Ming Sun; Wei De; Yong-Qian Shu
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Management and Outcomes of Esophageal Perforation: A National Study of 2,564 Patients in England.

Authors:  Sheraz R Markar; Hugh Mackenzie; Tom Wiggins; Alan Askari; Omar Faiz; Giovanni Zaninotto; George B Hanna
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Prognostic impact of hospital volume on familial adenomatous polyposis: a nationwide multicenter study.

Authors:  Masahiro Tanaka; Yukihide Kanemitsu; Hideki Ueno; Hirotoshi Kobayashi; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Fumio Ishida; Tatsuro Yamaguchi; Takao Hinoi; Yasuhiro Inoue; Naohiro Tomita; Hideyuki Ishida; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.