Literature DB >> 28831607

Prognostic impact of hospital volume on familial adenomatous polyposis: a nationwide multicenter study.

Masahiro Tanaka1, Yukihide Kanemitsu2, Hideki Ueno3, Hirotoshi Kobayashi4, Tsuyoshi Konishi5, Fumio Ishida6, Tatsuro Yamaguchi7, Takao Hinoi8, Yasuhiro Inoue9, Naohiro Tomita10, Hideyuki Ishida11, Kenichi Sugihara12.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Many studies have shown that hospital volume is significantly associated with short- and long-term outcomes in various diseases, including cancer. However, there have been no reports discussing the relationship between hospital volume and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). This study aimed to clarify whether hospital volume affects short- and long-term outcomes in FAP patients.
METHODS: We established a retrospectively collected database of FAP patients who underwent initial surgical treatment at 23 Japanese institutions during 2000-2012. Factors associated with short- and long-term outcomes were analyzed.
RESULTS: The study cohort included 303 FAP patients. These patients were classified into tertile categories according to hospital volume: low (n = 31), middle (n = 72), and high volume (n = 200). The proportion of only adenoma/stage 0 was comparable among tertile categories. The adoption of operative procedure significantly differed among tertile categories; specifically, high-volume institutions preferred handsewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without diverting ileostomy (P < 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). Nevertheless, the frequency of complications with Clavien-Dindo classification grade ≥ 3 was not significantly different among tertile categories. Functional results were acceptable in every category. Wexner scores were significantly lower in high-volume compared to low-volume institutions (P = 0.02). Multivariate analyses showed that UICC stage and hospital volume were significantly associated with overall survival (P = 0.04 and 0.03, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Hospital volume was significantly associated with short- and long-term outcomes in FAP patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Familial adenomatous polyposis; Hospital volume; IPAA; Prognosis; Tertile

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28831607     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-017-2885-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  45 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Evidence of benefit from centralised treatment of ovarian cancer: a nationwide population-based survival analysis in Finland.

Authors:  Salla Kumpulainen; Seija Grénman; Pentti Kyyrönen; Eero Pukkala; Risto Sankila
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-12-10       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  A comparison of hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy: a meta-analysis of 4183 patients.

Authors:  Richard E Lovegrove; Vasilis A Constantinides; Alexander G Heriot; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi; Feza H Remzi; R John Nicholls; Victor W Fazio; Paris P Tekkis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Meta-analysis of observational studies of ileorectal versus ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  O Aziz; T Athanasiou; V W Fazio; R J Nicholls; A W Darzi; J Church; R K S Phillips; P P Tekkis
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Hospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resection.

Authors:  Deborah Schrag; Katherine S Panageas; Elyn Riedel; Laura D Cramer; Jose G Guillem; Peter B Bach; Colin B Begg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Impact of Screening on Survival in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.

Authors:  Laura Koskenvuo; Janne Pitkäniemi; Matti Rantanen; Anna Lepistö
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.062

7.  Mortality in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  M L Arvanitis; D G Jagelman; V W Fazio; I C Lavery; E McGannon
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 8.  Colorectal cancer.

Authors:  David Cunningham; Wendy Atkin; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Henry T Lynch; Bruce Minsky; Bernard Nordlinger; Naureen Starling
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  The incidence rate of familial adenomatous polyposis. Results from the Danish Polyposis Register.

Authors:  S Bülow; T Faurschou Nielsen; C Bülow; M L Bisgaard; L Karlsen; F Moesgaard
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  Extra-intestinal manifestations of familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Emma J Groen; Annemieke Roos; Friso L Muntinghe; Roelien H Enting; Jakob de Vries; Jan H Kleibeuker; Max J H Witjes; Thera P Links; André P van Beek
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  1 in total

1.  Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2020 for the Clinical Practice of Hereditary Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Naohiro Tomita; Hideyuki Ishida; Kohji Tanakaya; Tatsuro Yamaguchi; Kensuke Kumamoto; Toshiaki Tanaka; Takao Hinoi; Yasuyuki Miyakura; Hirotoshi Hasegawa; Tetsuji Takayama; Hideki Ishikawa; Takeshi Nakajima; Akiko Chino; Hideki Shimodaira; Akira Hirasawa; Yoshiko Nakayama; Shigeki Sekine; Kazuo Tamura; Kiwamu Akagi; Yuko Kawasaki; Hirotoshi Kobayashi; Masami Arai; Michio Itabashi; Yojiro Hashiguchi; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.402

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.