Literature DB >> 23086766

Intraoperative frozen section analysis of margins in breast conserving surgery significantly decreases reoperative rates: one-year experience at an ambulatory surgical center.

Julie M Jorns1, Daniel Visscher, Michael Sabel, Tara Breslin, Patrick Healy, Stephanie Daignaut, Jeffrey L Myers, Angela J Wu.   

Abstract

Intraoperative frozen section (FS) margin evaluation is not common practice for patients undergoing breast conservation therapy (BCT), but offers a significant reduction in reoperation. In this study, a technique to allow for more effective freezing of breast tissue was developed to perform FS evaluation of lumpectomy margins (FSM) for all patients undergoing BCT at an ambulatory surgery center. FS evaluation of sentinel lymph node biopsy specimens was performed concurrently. One hundred eighty-one study and 188 control patients, with and without FS evaluation, were compared. Reexcision was reduced 34% (from 48.9% to 14.9%) and reoperation was reduced 36% (from 55.3% to 19.3%) with FS evaluation. Most of the decrease in reoperative rate was because of a decrease in the need for margin reexcision. The number of patients requiring 1, 2, or 3 operations to complete therapy was 84, 92, and 12, respectively, in the control group, and 146, 33, and 2, respectively, in the study group. Lobular subtype, multifocal disease, and larger tumor size (≥2 cm) were significantly associated with failure of FSM to prevent reoperation, but reoperation rates were still significantly decreased in this subgroup of patients (from 75.5% to 43.8%) with FSM. This study highlights an innovative yet simple and adaptable FS approach that resulted in a nearly 3-fold reduction in reoperation for patients undergoing BCT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23086766      PMCID: PMC3988579          DOI: 10.1309/AJCP4IEMXCJ1GDTS

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  48 in total

1.  Wire-guided excision of non-palpable breast cancer: determinants and correlations between radiologic and histologic margins and residual disease in re-excisions.

Authors:  A O Saarela; T J Rissanen; K M Lähteenmäki; Y Soini; K Haukipuro; O Kaarela; H O Kiviniemi
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.380

2.  The effect of timing of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery in patients with positive or close resection margins, young age, and node-negative disease, with long term follow-up.

Authors:  Olga Vujovic; Anil Cherian; Edward Yu; A Rashid Dar; Larry Stitt; Francisco Perera
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence.

Authors:  T P Olson; J Harter; A Muñoz; D M Mahvi; Tm Breslin
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Influence of frozen-section analysis of sentinel lymph node and lumpectomy margin status on reoperation rates in patients undergoing breast-conservation therapy.

Authors:  Sarah A McLaughlin; Lisa M Ochoa-Frongia; Sujata M Patil; Hiram S Cody; Lisa M Sclafani
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Total-circumference intraoperative frozen section analysis reduces margin-positive rate in breast-conservation surgery.

Authors:  Kayoko Fukamachi; Takanori Ishida; Shin Usami; Motohiro Takeda; Mika Watanabe; Hironobu Sasano; Noriaki Ohuchi
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Minimizing local recurrence after breast conserving therapy using intraoperative shaved margins to determine pathologic tumor clearance.

Authors:  E Ramsay Camp; Priscilla F McAuliffe; Jeffrey S Gilroy; Christopher G Morris; D Scott Lind; Nancy P Mendenhall; Edward M Copeland
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer.

Authors:  J A Jacobson; D N Danforth; K H Cowan; T d'Angelo; S M Steinberg; L Pierce; M E Lippman; A S Lichter; E Glatstein; P Okunieff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-04-06       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique.

Authors:  Anees B Chagpar; Robert C G Martin; Lee J Hagendoorn; Celia Chao; Kelly M McMasters
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program.

Authors:  Emil D Kurniawan; Matthew H Wong; Imogen Windle; Allison Rose; Arlene Mou; Malcolm Buchanan; John P Collins; Julie A Miller; Russell L Gruen; G Bruce Mann
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 2874 patients: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Ute Kettritz; Kerstin Rotter; Ingrid Schreer; Margarete Murauer; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Daniela Peter; Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  39 in total

1.  Rapid pathology of lumpectomy margins with open-top light-sheet (OTLS) microscopy.

Authors:  Ye Chen; Weisi Xie; Adam K Glaser; Nicholas P Reder; Chenyi Mao; Suzanne M Dintzis; Joshua C Vaughan; Jonathan T C Liu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Complementary use of polarization-sensitive and standard OCT metrics for enhanced intraoperative differentiation of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jianfeng Wang; Yang Xu; Kelly J Mesa; Fredrick A South; Eric J Chaney; Darold R Spillman; Ronit Barkalifa; Marina Marjanovic; P Scott Carney; Anna M Higham; Z George Liu; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Clinical feasibility of optical coherence micro-elastography for imaging tumor margins in breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Wes M Allen; Ken Y Foo; Renate Zilkens; Kelsey M Kennedy; Qi Fang; Lixin Chin; Benjamin F Dessauvagie; Bruce Latham; Christobel M Saunders; Brendan F Kennedy
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Efficacy of intraoperative entire-circumferential frozen section analysis of lumpectomy margins during breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer.

Authors:  Tomofumi Osako; Reiki Nishimura; Yasuyuki Nishiyama; Yasuhiro Okumura; Rumiko Tashima; Masahiro Nakano; Mamiko Fujisue; Yasuo Toyozumi; Nobuyuki Arima
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  Label-free optical imaging technologies for rapid translation and use during intraoperative surgical and tumor margin assessment.

Authors:  Stephen A Boppart; J Quincy Brown; Camile S Farah; Esther Kho; Laura Marcu; Christobel M Saunders; Henricus J C M Sterenborg
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis as a Tool in Confirming Negative Surgical Margins in Non-palpable Breast Lesions.

Authors:  Jithin T Chand; Mala M Sharma; Janaki P Dharmarajan; Ajit Nambiar
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-07-30

7.  Microscopic investigation of" topically applied nanoparticles for molecular imaging of fresh tissue surfaces.

Authors:  Soyoung Kang; Yu Winston Wang; Xiaochun Xu; Eric Navarro; Kenneth M Tichauer; Jonathan T C Liu
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.207

8.  Real-time Imaging of the Resection Bed Using a Handheld Probe to Reduce Incidence of Microscopic Positive Margins in Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Sarah J Erickson-Bhatt; Ryan M Nolan; Nathan D Shemonski; Steven G Adie; Jeffrey Putney; Donald Darga; Daniel T McCormick; Andrew J Cittadine; Adam M Zysk; Marina Marjanovic; Eric J Chaney; Guillermo L Monroy; Fredrick A South; Kimberly A Cradock; Z George Liu; Magesh Sundaram; Partha S Ray; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Multiplexed Molecular Imaging of Fresh Tissue Surfaces Enabled by Convection-Enhanced Topical Staining with SERS-Coded Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Yu W Wang; Josh D Doerksen; Soyoung Kang; Daniel Walsh; Qian Yang; Daniel Hong; Jonathan T C Liu
Journal:  Small       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 13.281

10.  Multiscale nonlinear microscopy and widefield white light imaging enables rapid histological imaging of surgical specimen margins.

Authors:  Michael G Giacomelli; Tadayuki Yoshitake; Lucas C Cahill; Hilde Vardeh; Liza M Quintana; Beverly E Faulkner-Jones; Jeff Brooker; James L Connolly; James G Fujimoto
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.732

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.