Literature DB >> 23084554

Medium-term follow-up of a modular tapered noncemented titanium stem in revision total hip arthroplasty: a single-surgeon experience.

Wolfgang Klauser1, Yannic Bangert, Philipp Lubinus, Daniel Kendoff.   

Abstract

We report a single-surgeon experience with a noncemented modular revision shaft (Modular Prosthesis; LINK, Hamburg, Germany) with clinical and radiographic results of 63 patients after 10 years. The Harris Hip Score improved from 51 to 84 points. Intraoperative complications included 11 fractures. Four patients had postoperative femoral fractures. Further shaft revisions were necessary: 1 subsidence, 1 late fracture, 1 late deep infection. Sixty-eight percent of cases showed revision defects as graded 3° by Mallory; 95 % did not show signs of loosening or subsidence; 38 patients showed adequate bone remodeling in the shaft and proximal femur; 21 patients showed excellent recovery of preoperative osteolytic areas, and 5 patients did not show signs of remodeling. The Modular Prosthesis stem shows adequate fixation and tendency toward satisfactory bone remodeling after 10 years. Crown
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23084554     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  8 in total

1.  Distal non-traumatic fracture of the cementless MP stem: A case report and review of previous reported cases.

Authors:  Hussein Abdelaziz; Christian Ansorge; Thorsten Gehrke; Mustafa Citak
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-07-30

2.  Single-stage Acetabular Revision During Two-stage THA Revision for Infection is Effective in Selected Patients.

Authors:  Bernd Fink; Michael Schlumberger; Damian Oremek
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Subsidence of monoblock and modular titanium fluted tapered stems in revision hip arthroplasty: A retrospective multicentre comparison study.

Authors:  Eoghan Pomeroy; Seán O Flynn; Mihai Grigoras; Terence P Murphy; Alexandra I Stavrakis; Fiachra E Rowan
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-09-13

4.  Mid-term outcomes of titanium modular neck femoral stems in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hervé Ouanezar; Thomas Jalaguier; Florent Franck; Vincent Pibarot; Hugo Bothorel; Mo Saffarini; Jean-Pierre Piton
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-03

5.  Technical Note for Transfemoral Implantation of Tapered Revision Stems. The Advantage to Stay Short.

Authors:  Bernd Fink
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-04-24

6.  Minimum 8-year follow-up of revision THA with severe femoral bone defects using extensively porous-coated stems and cortical strut allografts.

Authors:  Zi-Chuan Ding; Ting-Xian Ling; Ming-Cheng Yuan; Yong-Zhi Qin; Ping Mou; Hao-Yang Wang; Zong-Ke Zhou
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Comparison of modular and nonmodular tapered fluted titanium stems in femoral revision hip arthroplasty: a minimum 6-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Shuo Feng; Yu Zhang; Yu-Hang Bao; Zhi Yang; Guo-Chun Zha; Xiang-Yang Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Femoral Stem Fracture in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: A Systematic Literature Review of the Real-World Evidence.

Authors:  Matthias Sukopp; Dominic Taylor; Raimund Forst; Frank Seehaus
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 0.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.