Literature DB >> 23083792

David valve-sparing aortic root replacement: equivalent mid-term outcome for different valve types with or without connective tissue disorder.

John-Peder Escobar Kvitting1, Fabian A Kari, Michael P Fischbein, David H Liang, Anne-Sophie Beraud, Elizabeth H Stephens, R Scott Mitchell, D Craig Miller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although implicitly accepted by many that the durability of valve-sparing aortic root replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease and connective tissue disorders will be inferior, this hypothesis has not been rigorously investigated.
METHODS: From 1993 to 2009, 233 patients (27% bicuspid aortic valve, 40% Marfan syndrome) underwent Tirone David valve-sparing aortic root replacement. Follow-up averaged 4.7 ± 3.3 years (1102 patient-years). Freedom from adverse outcomes was determined using log-rank calculations.
RESULTS: Survival at 5 and 10 years was 98.7% ± 0.7% and 93.5% ± 5.1%, respectively. Freedom from reoperation (all causes) on the aortic root was 92.2% ± 3.6% at 10 years; 3 reoperations were aortic valve replacement owing to structural valve deterioration. Freedom from structural valve deterioration at 10 years was 96.1% ± 2.1%. No significant differences were found in survival (P = .805, P = .793, respectively), reoperation (P = .179, P = .973, respectively), structural valve deterioration (P = .639, P = .982, respectively), or any other functional or clinical endpoints when patients were stratified by valve type (tricuspid aortic valve vs bicuspid aortic valve) or associated connective tissue disorder. At the latest echocardiographic follow-up (95% complete), 202 patients (94.8%) had none or trace aortic regurgitation, 10 (4.7%) mild, 0 had moderate to severe, and 1 (0.5%) had severe aortic regurgitation. Freedom from greater than 2+ aortic regurgitation at 10 years was 95.3% ± 2.5%. Six patients sustained acute type B aortic dissection (freedom at 10 years, 90.4% ± 5.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: Tirone David reimplantation valve-sparing aortic root replacement in carefully selected young patients was associated with excellent clinical and echocardiographic outcome in patients with either a tricuspid aortic valve or bicuspid aortic valve. No demonstrable adverse influence was found for Marfan syndrome or connective tissue disorder on durability, clinical outcome, or echocardiographic results.
Copyright © 2013 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23083792      PMCID: PMC6382393          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  17 in total

1.  Sparing aortic valve techniques.

Authors:  Rubén Álvarez-Cabo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Toward standardization of valve-sparing root replacement and annuloplasty.

Authors:  Takashi Kunihara
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-09-17

Review 3.  Evolution of surgical therapy for Stanford acute type A aortic dissection.

Authors:  Peter Chiu; D Craig Miller
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-07

4.  Aortic valve sparing operations: a review.

Authors:  Tirone E David
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-08-03

Review 5.  Surgical treatment of aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Tirone E David
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  Long-term survival, valve durability, and reoperation for 4 aortic root procedures combined with ascending aorta replacement.

Authors:  Lars G Svensson; Saila T Pillai; Jeevanantham Rajeswaran; Milind Y Desai; Brian Griffin; Richard Grimm; Donald F Hammer; Maran Thamilarasan; Eric E Roselli; Gösta B Pettersson; A Marc Gillinov; Jose L Navia; Nicholas G Smedira; Joseph F Sabik; Bruce W Lytle; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Progression of Aortic Regurgitation After Different Repair Techniques for Congenital Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Authors:  Fabian A Kari; Johannes Kroll; Jan Kiss; Carolin Hess; Brigitte Stiller; Matthias Siepe; Friedhelm Beyersdorf
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  Left ventricular pseudoaneurysm after reimplantation procedure.

Authors:  Takahiro Inoue; Kazuhiro Hashimoto; Yoshimasa Sakamoto; Michio Yoshitake; Yoko Matsumura; Hiroo Kinami; Tomomitsu Takagi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-06-12

9.  The American Association for Thoracic Surgery consensus guidelines on bicuspid aortic valve-related aortopathy: Full online-only version.

Authors:  Michael A Borger; Paul W M Fedak; Elizabeth H Stephens; Thomas G Gleason; Evaldas Girdauskas; John S Ikonomidis; Ali Khoynezhad; Samuel C Siu; Subodh Verma; Michael D Hope; Duke E Cameron; Donald F Hammer; Joseph S Coselli; Marc R Moon; Thoralf M Sundt; Alex J Barker; Michael Markl; Alessandro Della Corte; Hector I Michelena; John A Elefteriades
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 10.  Overview of current surgical strategies for aortic disease in patients with Marfan syndrome.

Authors:  Shunsuke Miyahara; Yutaka Okita
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.