Literature DB >> 23076460

Benefit of robot-assisted laparoscopy in nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: urinary morbidity in early cervical cancer.

Fabrice Narducci1, Pierre Collinet, Benjamin Merlot, Eric Lambaudie, Loic Boulanger, Daniele Lefebvre-Kuntz, Philippe Nickers, Sophie Taieb, Gilles Houvenaeghel, Eric Leblanc.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer by robot-assisted laparoscopy and atonic bladder rate.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study with consecutive patients in three gynecological oncology departments. Patients with <2 cm cervical cancer had nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy by robot-assisted laparoscopy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Two days after surgery, we systematically removed the Foley bladder catheter.
RESULTS: The median (range) age and body mass index of the 30 patients were 44 (33-68) years and 23.9 (17.7-39.4) kg/m(2), respectively. The median (range) tumor diameter at the time of surgery was 13 (4-38) mm. The median (range) operative time, blood loss, and number of pelvic lymph nodes (any common iliac lymph nodes) were 305 (180-405) min, 100 (30-1,500) ml, and 18 (7-28). The overall complication rate was 52.3 %, of which 6.7 % atonic bladder. Twenty-eight patients (93.3 %) were discharged 2 days after surgery with spontaneous voiding and no residual urine >100 ml.
CONCLUSIONS: Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy by robot-assisted laparoscopy is feasible in early cervical cancer (<2 cm). A total of 93.3 % of the patients were discharged 2 days after surgery with spontaneous voiding. The next step would be a prospective study with objective urodynamic investigations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23076460     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2582-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  24 in total

1.  Identification and preservation of the motoric innervation of the bladder in radical hysterectomy type III.

Authors:  M Possover; S Stöber; K Plaul; A Schneider
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  [How I perform... vaginal preparation for a laparoscopic radical hysterectomy or the "Schautheim" procedure].

Authors:  E Leblanc
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Fertil       Date:  2007-02-20

3.  Lymphedema and bladder-emptying difficulties after radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer and among population controls.

Authors:  K Bergmark; E Avall-Lundqvist; P W Dickman; L Henningsohn; G Steineck
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.437

4.  Robotic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: feasibility and technique.

Authors:  Javier F Magrina; Wojciech Pawlina; Rosanne M Kho; Paul M Magtibay
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  A systematic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique in invasive cervical cancer for preserving postsurgical bladder function.

Authors:  N Sakuragi; Y Todo; M Kudo; R Yamamoto; T Sato
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.437

6.  Effect of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy on bladder function recovery and quality of life in patients with cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Jiahan Wu; Xishi Liu; Keqin Hua; Changdong Hu; Xiaojun Chen; Xin Lu
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.437

7.  Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer: 8-year experience of a pilot study.

Authors:  Christophe Pomel; David Atallah; Guillaume Le Bouedec; Roman Rouzier; Philippe Morice; Damienne Castaigne; Jacques Dauplat
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  John F Boggess; Paola A Gehrig; Leigh Cantrell; Aaron Shafer; Mildred Ridgway; Elizabeth N Skinner; Wesley C Fowler
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Michael Frumovitz; Ricardo dos Reis; Charlotte C Sun; Michael R Milam; Michael W Bevers; Jubilee Brown; Brian M Slomovitz; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Robot assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with short and long term morbidity data.

Authors:  Jan Persson; Petur Reynisson; Christer Borgfeldt; Paivi Kannisto; Bengt Lindahl; Thomas Bossmar
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 5.482

View more
  4 in total

1.  Breast cancer robotic nipple sparing mastectomy: evaluation of several surgical procedures and learning curve.

Authors:  G Houvenaeghel; M Bannier; S Rua; J Barrou; M Heinemann; A Van Troy; E Lambaudie; M Cohen
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 2.  Clinical efficacy and safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying Long; De-Sheng Yao; Xin-Wei Pan; Ting-Yu Ou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Skin sparing mastectomy and robotic latissimus dorsi-flap reconstruction through a single incision.

Authors:  Gilles Houvenaeghel; Marie Bannier; Sandrine Rua; Julien Barrou; Mellie Heinemann; Eric Lambaudie; Monique Cohen
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 2.754

4.  The early surgical period in robotic radical hysterectomy is related to the recurrence after surgery in stage IB cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jiheum Paek; Peter C Lim
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.