Literature DB >> 20606542

Effect of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy on bladder function recovery and quality of life in patients with cervical carcinoma.

Jiahan Wu1, Xishi Liu, Keqin Hua, Changdong Hu, Xiaojun Chen, Xin Lu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the bladder function recovery and quality of life (QOL) using nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (NSRH) in treating early invasive cervical carcinoma.
METHODS: Subjects included patients who underwent radical hysterectomy by laparotomy for early-stage cervical carcinoma. Thirty-one patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups: group A, 15 patients who underwent NSRH; and group B, 16 patients who underwent classical radical hysterectomy. We observed the patients' general clinical information, surgical characteristics, postoperative vital signs, pathological findings, adjuvant therapies, and adverse effects. A urodynamic study was used to assess the bladder function. The patients' QOL was evaluated by Functional Assessment of Cervical Cancer Therapy (FACT-Cx).
RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients completed the study. No significant differences were found in age, body mass index, surgery characteristics, pathological findings, adjuvant therapies, and main adverse effects between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The postoperative time of bladder function recovery in group A was obviously earlier than that in group B (P < 0.05). The urodynamic study showed that the extent of bladder function recovery in group A was better than that in group B (P < 0.05). The QOL in group A evaluated 1 year after operation was improved compared with that in group B (P < 0.05). The QOL analysis showed that group A did much better than group B in social and family life, emotional well-being, working status, and the symptom correlated with the operation (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found in basic bodily functions (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy is a safe and reliable technique for early invasive cervical carcinoma. The postoperative bladder function recovery and the patients' QOL were improved after NSRH compared with the control group. Therefore, NSRH could be an alternative management to modify the classical surgery for cervical carcinoma with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IB1 to IIA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20606542     DOI: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181df99c0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  15 in total

1.  Asian society of gynecologic oncology workshop 2010.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Suh; Jae Weon Kim; Mohamad Farid Aziz; Uma K Devi; Hextan Y S Ngan; Joo-Hyun Nam; Seung Cheol Kim; Tomoyasu Kato; Hee Sug Ryu; Shingo Fujii; Yoon Soon Lee; Jong Hyeok Kim; Tae-Joong Kim; Young Tae Kim; Kung-Liahng Wang; Taek Sang Lee; Kimio Ushijima; Sang-Goo Shin; Yin Nin Chia; Sarikapan Wilailak; Sang Yoon Park; Hidetaka Katabuchi; Toshiharu Kamura; Soon-Beom Kang
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 2.  Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical cancer (stage Ia2 to IIa).

Authors:  Chumnan Kietpeerakool; Apiwat Aue-Aungkul; Khadra Galaal; Chetta Ngamjarus; Pisake Lumbiganon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-02-12

Review 3.  Lower urinary tract dysfunction after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Fouad Aoun; Roland van Velthoven
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Perioperative betamethasone treatment reduces signs of bladder dysfunction in a rat model for neurapraxia in female urogenital surgery.

Authors:  Fabio Castiglione; Alice Bergamini; Arianna Bettiga; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Fabio Benigni; Frank Strittmatter; Giorgio Gandaglia; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi; Petter Hedlund
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Benefit of robot-assisted laparoscopy in nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: urinary morbidity in early cervical cancer.

Authors:  Fabrice Narducci; Pierre Collinet; Benjamin Merlot; Eric Lambaudie; Loic Boulanger; Daniele Lefebvre-Kuntz; Philippe Nickers; Sophie Taieb; Gilles Houvenaeghel; Eric Leblanc
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Postoperative Health-Related Quality of Life of Cervical Cancer Patients - A Comparison between the Wertheim-Meigs Operation and Total Mesometrial Resection (TMMR).

Authors:  E Sowa; S Kuhnt; A Hinz; C Schröder; T Deutsch; K Geue
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 7.  Urological complications after treatment of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Esther M K Wit; Simon Horenblas
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Evaluation of a Program of Clean Intermittent Catheterization for Underactive Bladder After Radical Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Katsuya Hikita; Masashi Honda; Yusuke Kimura; Bunya Kawamoto; Panagiota Tsounapi; Shuichi Morizane; Atsushi Takenaka
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 1.641

9.  Efficacy and oncologic safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ju Won Roh; Dong Ock Lee; Dong Hoon Suh; Myong Cheol Lim; Sang Soo Seo; Jinsoo Chung; Sun Lee; Sang Yoon Park
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 10.  Clinical efficacy and safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying Long; De-Sheng Yao; Xin-Wei Pan; Ting-Yu Ou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.