Literature DB >> 21419478

Robotic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: feasibility and technique.

Javier F Magrina1, Wojciech Pawlina, Rosanne M Kho, Paul M Magtibay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the anatomy of pelvic autonomic nerves as it applies to nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy, and the technique, feasibility, and results of robotic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.
METHODS: Prospective evaluation of 6 patients undergoing robotic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (type C1) for cervical cancer Stage IB (1B1 in 3 and 1B2 in 3 patients). Pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in 3 patients and pelvic and aortic in the remaining 3 patients.
RESULTS: The operation was completed in all patients. The mean age of the patients was 51.0 (range 33-73) and mean BMI 27.8 (range 23.2-35.1). The mean operating time was 238.6 min (range 207-256), mean blood loss 135 ml (range 100-150), mean number of lymph nodes was 23.6 (range 19-29), mean hospital stay was 2 days (range 1-4). There were no intraoperative complications. Postoperative complications occurred in 1 patient with an ileus who required an extended hospital stay. One patient did not regain normal urinary voidings until the fourth week after surgery. All patients remain free of disease.
CONCLUSION: Robotic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy is safe and feasible. Urinary dysfunction may occur.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21419478     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.02.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  8 in total

1.  Nerve-sparing robotic radical hysterectomy: our technique.

Authors:  Shailesh P Puntambekar; Akhil Lawande; Riddhi Desai; Rahul Kenawadekar; Saurabh Joshi; Geetanjali Agarwal Joshi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-07-24

Review 2.  Lower urinary tract dysfunction after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Fouad Aoun; Roland van Velthoven
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Expanding the indications for radical trachelectomy: a report on 29 patients with stage IB1 tumors measuring 2 to 4 centimeters.

Authors:  Stephanie L Wethington; Yukio Sonoda; Kay J Park; Kaled M Alektiar; William P Tew; Dennis S Chi; Mario M Leitao; Elizabeth L Jewell; Richard R Barakat; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.437

4.  Benefit of robot-assisted laparoscopy in nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: urinary morbidity in early cervical cancer.

Authors:  Fabrice Narducci; Pierre Collinet; Benjamin Merlot; Eric Lambaudie; Loic Boulanger; Daniele Lefebvre-Kuntz; Philippe Nickers; Sophie Taieb; Gilles Houvenaeghel; Eric Leblanc
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: review of surgical and oncological outcomes.

Authors:  Seracchioli Renato; Mabrouk Mohamed; Solfrini Serena; Montanari Giulia; Ferrini Giulia; Giovanardi Giulia; Raimondo Diego; Schiavina Riccardo
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-11-09

6.  Robotic surgery in gynecology: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Lori Weinberg; Sanjay Rao; Pedro F Escobar
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2011-11-28

Review 7.  Lower urinary tract dysfunction in pelvic gynecologic cancer: the role of urodynamics.

Authors:  Fouad Aoun; Alexandre Peltier; Roland van Velthoven
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2014-11-23

8.  The early surgical period in robotic radical hysterectomy is related to the recurrence after surgery in stage IB cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jiheum Paek; Peter C Lim
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.738

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.