Literature DB >> 23074991

Ethical virtues in scientific research.

David B Resnik1.   

Abstract

Most approaches to promoting integrity in research are principle-based in that they portray ethical conduct as consisting of adherence to ethical rules, duties, or responsibilities. Bruce MacFarlane has recently criticized the principle-based approach to promoting integrity in research and offered a virtue-based alternative. MacFarlane argues that principle-based approaches do not provide adequate guidance for ethical decision-making and are not very useful in moral education. In this article, I examine and critique MacFarlane's defense of the virtue-based approach. I argue that virtue-based and principle-based approaches to ethics are complementary and that they both can help promote research integrity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23074991      PMCID: PMC3521635          DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2012.728908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Account Res        ISSN: 0898-9621            Impact factor:   2.622


  15 in total

1.  An ethics framework for public health.

Authors:  N E Kass
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Authorship and publication practices: evaluation of the effect of responsible conduct of research instruction to postdoctoral trainees.

Authors:  Carolyn L Funk; Kirsten A Barrett; Francis L Macrina
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Effectiveness of a responsible conduct of research course: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Sean T Powell; Matthew A Allison; Michael W Kalichman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Prevention over cure: the administrative rationale for education in the responsible conduct of research.

Authors:  Daniel R Vasgird
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists' misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-funded scientists.

Authors:  Melissa S Anderson; Aaron S Horn; Kelly R Risbey; Emily A Ronning; Raymond De Vries; Brian C Martinson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Mentoring and research misconduct: an analysis of research mentoring in closed ORI cases.

Authors:  David E Wright; Sandra L Titus; Jered B Cornelison
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  The role of mentors in promoting integrity and preventing scientific misconduct in nursing research.

Authors:  L D Wocial
Journal:  J Prof Nurs       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.104

8.  Ethics and clinical research.

Authors:  H K Beecher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1966-06-16       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope.

Authors:  R Gillon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-07-16

10.  A Meta-Analysis of Ethics Instruction Effectiveness in the Sciences.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; Stephen T Murphy; Ethan P Waples; Michael D Mumford; Ryan P Brown; Shane Connelly; Lynn D Devenport
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2009-09-01
View more
  8 in total

1.  Involuntary euthanasia of severely ill newborns: is the Groningen Protocol really dangerous?

Authors:  P Voultsos; F Chatzinikolaou
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 0.471

2.  Engineering Values Into Genetic Engineering: A Proposed Analytic Framework for Scientific Social Responsibility.

Authors:  Pamela L Sankar; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  Strategies for success in a nursing PhD program and beyond.

Authors:  Marlena C Fisher; Tamryn F Gray; Melissa K Uveges; Katherine E Heinze; Tiffany P Pellathy; Elaina Parrillo; Marilyn Hravnak; Marie T Nolan
Journal:  J Prof Nurs       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 4.  The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles.

Authors:  Felicitas Hesselmann; Verena Graf; Marion Schmidt; Martin Reinhart
Journal:  Curr Sociol       Date:  2016-10-13

5.  Virtue ethics of clinical research.

Authors:  María PérezñPinar; Luis Ayerbe
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

6.  How do researchers acquire and develop notions of research integrity? A qualitative study among biomedical researchers in Switzerland.

Authors:  Priya Satalkar; David Shaw
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Stakeholders' perspectives on research integrity training practices: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Daniel Pizzolato; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  Improving open and rigorous science: ten key future research opportunities related to rigor, reproducibility, and transparency in scientific research.

Authors:  Danny Valdez; Colby J Vorland; Andrew W Brown; Evan Mayo-Wilson; Justin Otten; Richard Ball; Sean Grant; Rachel Levy; Dubravka Svetina Valdivia; David B Allison
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-10-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.