| Literature DB >> 23074991 |
Abstract
Most approaches to promoting integrity in research are principle-based in that they portray ethical conduct as consisting of adherence to ethical rules, duties, or responsibilities. Bruce MacFarlane has recently criticized the principle-based approach to promoting integrity in research and offered a virtue-based alternative. MacFarlane argues that principle-based approaches do not provide adequate guidance for ethical decision-making and are not very useful in moral education. In this article, I examine and critique MacFarlane's defense of the virtue-based approach. I argue that virtue-based and principle-based approaches to ethics are complementary and that they both can help promote research integrity.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23074991 PMCID: PMC3521635 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2012.728908
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Account Res ISSN: 0898-9621 Impact factor: 2.622