Literature DB >> 23073499

Humans deploy diverse strategies in learning same-different discrimination tasks.

Leyre Castro1, Edward A Wasserman.   

Abstract

Prior research suggests that variability discrimination is basic to same-different conceptualization (Young and Wasserman, 2001). In that research, people were trained with 16-item arrays; this training might have encouraged people to use perceptual variability to solve the task. Here, two groups of participants were trained with either 2- or 16-item Same and Different arrays (Groups 2 and 16, respectively). Participants had to learn which of two arbitrary responses was correct for the arrays without being told about the "sameness" or "differentness" of the stimuli. Surprisingly, 52% of participants in Group 2 did not learn the discrimination compared to only 21% of participants in Group 16; also, learners in Group 16 reached higher accuracy levels sooner and their choice responding was faster than learners in Group 2. A large disparity in the variability (measured by entropy) between the Same and Different arrays evidently helped participants to learn the same-different task. As well, in Group 16, we found the same two patterns of performance-Categorical and Continuous-as in prior research (Castro et al., 2006; Young and Wasserman, 2001). In Group 2, we again found the Categorical cluster, but we lost the genuine Continuous cluster and we observed a novel strategy: some participants developed a highly inclusive notion of "sameness" that applied to any array containing at least two identical icons. These findings indicate that individuals may deploy a multiplicity of possible strategies when learning a seemingly simple same-different discrimination.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23073499     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  3 in total

1.  Breaking the perceptual-conceptual barrier: Relational matching and working memory.

Authors:  J David Smith; Brooke N Jackson; Barbara A Church
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-04

2.  Fading perceptual resemblance: a path for rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) to conceptual matching?

Authors:  J David Smith; Timothy M Flemming; Joseph Boomer; Michael J Beran; Barbara A Church
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-09-25

3.  Two-item conditional same-different categorization in pigeons: Finding differences.

Authors:  Francisca Diaz; Ellen M O'Donoghue; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 2.088

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.